This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 12 Oct 17 1.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
Because back in 1990 the way it worked Mr Singleton with no kids on £11k a year in his small flat was paying the same to the local authority for whatnot as 5 member family Mr Rich on £30k a year in his 4 bed detached and they both lived in the same street. And Mrs Rich was in trouble. She looked after the young kids, had no income apart from housekeeping, but another Poll Tax bill kept landing on the doorstep addressed to her. Then the Tories and their new laws started jailing people who literally couldn't pay and the rest is history. Bye, bye Margaret. Edited by Kermit8 (12 Oct 2017 1.14pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 12 Oct 17 1.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
Arguably, the insane war reparations demands, and then the 1929 Stock Market Crash and its impact on the world economy, and how this impacted Germany, pretty much ensured that either the Communists or the Fascists / National Socialists, were going to become major political players in Germany. Usually, people are much more inspired by economic disasters to 'do something'. Most people fighting for IS in Syria are doing it because they pay well. Not everyone is a fanatic - The same applied with the Iraqi Insurgency - Sunni's found work impossible to come by, there was 400,000 laid off from the military - and the insurgents were paying for ex-military. Most people respond to economic incentives far more than religious ones. Look at poor areas, and you'll see the extremists recruit mostly there. I agree with what you're saying regarding lack of opportunities do invite people into terrorism. It has for time, and although it can be argued it applies in France and Belgium, it doesn't in Germany or Britain. These here are vermin and have opportunities in a near post code. It isn't inevitable and our fault they're (thousands of them) manipulated to go to Syria, learn cowardly combat and return to blow up or machete innocent people unable to defend themselves, with many secretly okay it's happening when surveyed. I'm also aware aware of enough middle eastern politics and military strategy at the time and the IS rising in Iraq prisons to understand that side. It doesn't excuse British Muslims going back and forth with the intention to murder in this country where plenty have opportunities and benefits available. Get yourselves employable or fvck off if this country isn't for you. Edited by Rudi Hedman (12 Oct 2017 1.52pm)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 12 Oct 17 1.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Paragraph 1. Based on what? Is there a translator in the house.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 12 Oct 17 1.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
I agree with what you're saying regarding lack of opportunities do invite people into terrorism. It has for time. And although it can be argued it does it applies in France and Belgium, it doesn't in Germany or Britain. These here are vermin and have opportunities in a near post code. It isn't inevitable and our fault they're (thousands of them) manipulated to go to Syria, learn cowardly combat and return to blow up or machete innocent people unable to defend themselves, with many secretly okay it's happening when surveyed. I'm also aware aware of enough middle eastern politics and military strategy at the time and the IS rising in Iraq prisons to understand that side. It doesn't excuse British Muslims going back and forth with the intention to murder in this country where plenty have opportunities and benefits available. Get yourselves employable or fvck off if this country isn't for you. Indeed, I have some sympathies for people in Iraq and Syria, I'm kind of ok in a way for those who go there to fight in some absurdly stupid war - I don't really give a s**t about (I have problems maybe with them fighting for IS which is a death cult pseudo fascist organisation). I don't like Islamist causes, but if you believe so much that your going to fight to create a Islamist Caliphate, well that's your choice. But stay there please - you willingly joined a death cult for whom genocide is a domestic policy. Don't coming running home because your stupid plan turned out to be a f**king terrible idea - and now the people you were determined to exterminate are going to kill you. I have none for people who think that they're fighting for a cause when they kill civilians in the streets of the UK. F**kers, its a shame we can resurrect them so they can spend the rest of their lives in a cell, alone and hated.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 12 Oct 17 2.06pm | |
---|---|
As has been said before, it is odd that the liberal Left defends Islam so much when so much about Islam runs counter to their beliefs.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 12 Oct 17 2.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The poll tax riots were a bunch of unemployed layabouts kicking off because they might actually have to pay for something. It was a purely political protest and the response was also political. There must have been a lot of them, because I was there during the protests, as a young 17 year old (and I had a job), and it seemed at the time that no one wanted this unfair and class biased tax, even members of the conservative party by the time of the riots didn't see pursuit of the poll tax as a good idea. Everything was wrong about the poll tax - it exemplified exactly the kind of 'class war' that the Conservatives had been pursuing - Benefits for the rich, at the cost of the ordinary working people. It was unfair, class biased and absurdly unpopular. It wasn't just the unemployed few who turned out to protest it.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 12 Oct 17 2.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jamiemartin721
There must have been a lot of them, because I was there during the protests, as a young 17 year old (and I had a job), and it seemed at the time that no one wanted this unfair and class biased tax, even members of the conservative party by the time of the riots didn't see pursuit of the poll tax as a good idea. Everything was wrong about the poll tax - it exemplified exactly the kind of 'class war' that the Conservatives had been pursuing - Benefits for the rich, at the cost of the ordinary working people. It was unfair, class biased and absurdly unpopular. It wasn't just the unemployed few who turned out to protest it. I'm sure. There were lots of left wing activists there like you.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Park Road 12 Oct 17 2.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Interesting read. It doesn't address the power vacuum that ISIS et al were able to fill that was a direct result of foreign policy though. The so called power vacuum could have been I suppose filled by anyone it just so happens ISIS filled it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 12 Oct 17 2.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I'm sure. There were lots of left wing activists there like you. Someone in a bed sit shouldn't pay the same as someone in a mansion in a civilised progressive society. It was regressive, ideological and political suicide.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Park Road 12 Oct 17 2.46pm | |
---|---|
On a lighter note The FLA has no policy on the poll tax and will not march either for or against it
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 12 Oct 17 2.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Someone in a bed sit shouldn't pay the same as someone in a mansion in a civilised progressive society. It was regressive, ideological and political suicide. Poll tax was on individuals, not property. That was the point. A person in a mansion would be unlikely to be living there alone.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 12 Oct 17 3.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Poll tax was on individuals, not property. That was the point. A person in a mansion would be unlikely to be living there alone. Maybe neither would a family with 3 adults just over 18 living in Thornton Heath. Why should they pay 5 times when the wealthy couple in a big place with nobody over 18 with them pay twice? It was regressive.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.