No more immigrants.

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

No more immigrants.

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 14 of 85 < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 >

legaleagle 04 Aug 15 10.19pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.11pm Quote legaleagle at 04 Aug 2015 10.09pm Its not compulsory and if you'd rather remain unaware of actual facts relating to points you post about,that's a matter for you entirely. Yet again, no answer to the questions. We will just have to draw our own conclusions. Perhaps you can plead silence on the grounds that it might incriminate yourself? I think you may have committed quite enough self-incrimination to cover both of us for one evening If and when you ever actually read the immigration rules,do let us know which particular rule/s you think are inadequate (if any) and why.
Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle

04 Aug 15 10.19pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.11pm

Quote legaleagle at 04 Aug 2015 10.09pm

Its not compulsory and if you'd rather remain unaware of actual facts relating to points you post about,that's a matter for you entirely.

Yet again, no answer to the questions. We will just have to draw our own conclusions. Perhaps you can plead silence on the grounds that it might incriminate yourself?

I think you may have committed quite enough self-incrimination to cover both of us for one evening

If and when you ever actually read the immigration rules,do let us know which particular rule/s you think are inadequate (if any) and why.

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 04 Aug 15 10.20pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.08pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.05pm Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 9.32pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 8.45pm Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 8.42pm Kermy only speaks for a minority of people....like the rest of the open door immigration supporters on here. 75 percent in England want reduced immigration....Hell even in Scotland.....It's 58 percent.....That's even with their far left nationalists in charge dibbling out their anti Ukip waffle. They don't even represent the real views of the Scottish on the issue......God forbid what the numbers would be if more foreigners actually wanted to live in Scotland. [Link] I would be very interested if you could find a line on here from my hand that supports that assertion. We have open door immigration in relation to the EU. So are you now saying you're against 'freedom of movement'? Because that is open door and that's what I'm referring to. Ah, I see. You have qualified it. Now. Yes, you are right. I see no reason for the 2million British living in other EU countries to have restrictions placed on their movement which would rightly come into line with the restrictions you would have placed on those coming to the UK from France, Spain and the rest. Or is it a one-way street you want? What is your immigration policy then Kermit? Why do we need any sort of immigration controls? Well, first out of the door would be the South Africans and Zimbabweans. They have absolutely no need to be here. That'll free up around 300,000 pressure points on our services. Take it from there really. Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 04 Aug 15 10.20pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.08pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.05pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 9.32pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 8.45pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 8.42pm

Kermy only speaks for a minority of people....like the rest of the open door immigration supporters on here.

75 percent in England want reduced immigration....Hell even in Scotland.....It's 58 percent.....That's even with their far left nationalists in charge dibbling out their anti Ukip waffle.

They don't even represent the real views of the Scottish on the issue......God forbid what the numbers would be if more foreigners actually wanted to live in Scotland.

[Link]

I would be very interested if you could find a line on here from my hand that supports that assertion.

We have open door immigration in relation to the EU. So are you now saying you're against 'freedom of movement'?

Because that is open door and that's what I'm referring to.

Ah, I see. You have qualified it. Now.

Yes, you are right. I see no reason for the 2million British living in other EU countries to have restrictions placed on their movement which would rightly come into line with the restrictions you would have placed on those coming to the UK from France, Spain and the rest.

Or is it a one-way street you want?

What is your immigration policy then Kermit? Why do we need any sort of immigration controls?

Well, first out of the door would be the South Africans and Zimbabweans. They have absolutely no need to be here. That'll free up around 300,000 pressure points on our services.

Take it from there really.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

leggedstruggle Croydon 04 Aug 15 10.23pm
Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.20pm Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.08pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.05pm Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 9.32pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 8.45pm Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 8.42pm Kermy only speaks for a minority of people....like the rest of the open door immigration supporters on here. 75 percent in England want reduced immigration....Hell even in Scotland.....It's 58 percent.....That's even with their far left nationalists in charge dibbling out their anti Ukip waffle. They don't even represent the real views of the Scottish on the issue......God forbid what the numbers would be if more foreigners actually wanted to live in Scotland. [Link] I would be very interested if you could find a line on here from my hand that supports that assertion. We have open door immigration in relation to the EU. So are you now saying you're against 'freedom of movement'? Because that is open door and that's what I'm referring to. Ah, I see. You have qualified it. Now. Yes, you are right. I see no reason for the 2million British living in other EU countries to have restrictions placed on their movement which would rightly come into line with the restrictions you would have placed on those coming to the UK from France, Spain and the rest. Or is it a one-way street you want? What is your immigration policy then Kermit? Why do we need any sort of immigration controls? Well, first out of the door would be the South Africans and Zimbabweans. They have absolutely no need to be here. That'll free up around 300,000 pressure points on our services. Take it from there really. It is very entertaining having you and legaleagle wriggling away from answering very straightforward questions. Take note everyone and bear in mind when you read their next sanctimonious posts on immigration. mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler
Alert a moderator to this post

leggedstruggle

Croydon 04 Aug 15 10.23pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.20pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.08pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.05pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 9.32pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 8.45pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 8.42pm

Kermy only speaks for a minority of people....like the rest of the open door immigration supporters on here.

75 percent in England want reduced immigration....Hell even in Scotland.....It's 58 percent.....That's even with their far left nationalists in charge dibbling out their anti Ukip waffle.

They don't even represent the real views of the Scottish on the issue......God forbid what the numbers would be if more foreigners actually wanted to live in Scotland.

[Link]

I would be very interested if you could find a line on here from my hand that supports that assertion.

We have open door immigration in relation to the EU. So are you now saying you're against 'freedom of movement'?

Because that is open door and that's what I'm referring to.

Ah, I see. You have qualified it. Now.

Or is it a one-way street you want?

What is your immigration policy then Kermit? Why do we need any sort of immigration controls?

Well, first out of the door would be the South Africans and Zimbabweans. They have absolutely no need to be here. That'll free up around 300,000 pressure points on our services.

Take it from there really.

It is very entertaining having you and legaleagle wriggling away from answering very straightforward questions. Take note everyone and bear in mind when you read their next sanctimonious posts on immigration.

mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 04 Aug 15 10.29pm
In short, on immigration the 'real left'....The 'Corbyn' left if you will.....Which to be honest is the core political position of most Labour activists, they have completely lost the argument on immigration with the British public. The people who actually have to live within the society that they want...the vast majority.... don't like their beliefs on immigration. So what you get in discussions with them is the old, 'wiggling on a pin head'.....arguments around the edges of the issue to avoid the central points......And of course good old fashioned denial. There are some old Labour people who recognise the fact that the working class suffer for these policies and that the only real winners are actually those looking for wage controls and corporations..... but they are drowned out by this bizarre fear within activists not to be regarded as agreeing with Ukip or being regarded as a racist. The left today are in a totally ridiculous position on immigration......Left behind by reality. Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Aug 2015 10.29pm) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

04 Aug 15 10.29pm

In short, on immigration the 'real left'....The 'Corbyn' left if you will.....Which to be honest is the core political position of most Labour activists, they have completely lost the argument on immigration with the British public.

The people who actually have to live within the society that they want...the vast majority.... don't like their beliefs on immigration.

So what you get in discussions with them is the old, 'wiggling on a pin head'.....arguments around the edges of the issue to avoid the central points......And of course good old fashioned denial.

There are some old Labour people who recognise the fact that the working class suffer for these policies and that the only real winners are actually those looking for wage controls and corporations..... but they are drowned out by this bizarre fear within activists not to be regarded as agreeing with Ukip or being regarded as a racist.

The left today are in a totally ridiculous position on immigration......Left behind by reality.

Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Aug 2015 10.29pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 04 Aug 15 10.31pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 10.07pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.05pm Ah, I see. You have qualified it. Now. Yes, you are right. I see no reason for the 2million British living in other EU countries to have restrictions placed on their movement which would rightly come into line with the restrictions you would have placed on those coming to the UK from France, Spain and the rest. Or is it a one-way street you want? No, I'm totally happy for a two way street. There should be no open door immigration that exists between different countries. All it ultimately does is weaken the working class within the stronger economic states.....You see Kermy....On this topic...I'm more old Labour than you are. As for qualifying it Kermy, I'd have thought....considering the current status of our differing immigration rules concerning non and EU citizens that my point was obvious. Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Aug 2015 10.16pm) The impracticality of that is, frankly, overwhelming. Cliff would have to leave his vineyard in Portugal and return to Surrey 24/7. Oh, and there is also the upheaval of the other 1,999,999 Brits to consider. Is that what you want? Or would they be allowed to stay and newcomers rejected? So family members or individuals would have to stay in the UK and not go and live in a place in the sun with their olds or, perhaps, potential spouses. And the jobs. Who will think of those who won't be allowed to migrate to work long term for companies across the channel even though they are the best qualified for it? The United States of America allows freedom of movement and internal migration. Works for them. We have a United States of Europe now. Can't see the point in trying to restrict movement here myself - very Iron Curtain - but there you go. Or don't as could be the case. Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 04 Aug 15 10.31pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 10.07pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.05pm

Ah, I see. You have qualified it. Now.

Or is it a one-way street you want?

No, I'm totally happy for a two way street.

There should be no open door immigration that exists between different countries.

All it ultimately does is weaken the working class within the stronger economic states.....You see Kermy....On this topic...I'm more old Labour than you are.

As for qualifying it Kermy, I'd have thought....considering the current status of our differing immigration rules concerning non and EU citizens that my point was obvious.

Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Aug 2015 10.16pm)

The impracticality of that is, frankly, overwhelming. Cliff would have to leave his vineyard in Portugal and return to Surrey 24/7. Oh, and there is also the upheaval of the other 1,999,999 Brits to consider. Is that what you want?

Or would they be allowed to stay and newcomers rejected? So family members or individuals would have to stay in the UK and not go and live in a place in the sun with their olds or, perhaps, potential spouses.

And the jobs. Who will think of those who won't be allowed to migrate to work long term for companies across the channel even though they are the best qualified for it?

The United States of America allows freedom of movement and internal migration. Works for them. We have a United States of Europe now. Can't see the point in trying to restrict movement here myself - very Iron Curtain - but there you go. Or don't as could be the case.

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 04 Aug 15 10.33pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.23pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.20pm Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.08pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.05pm Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 9.32pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 8.45pm Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 8.42pm Kermy only speaks for a minority of people....like the rest of the open door immigration supporters on here. 75 percent in England want reduced immigration....Hell even in Scotland.....It's 58 percent.....That's even with their far left nationalists in charge dibbling out their anti Ukip waffle. They don't even represent the real views of the Scottish on the issue......God forbid what the numbers would be if more foreigners actually wanted to live in Scotland. [Link] I would be very interested if you could find a line on here from my hand that supports that assertion. We have open door immigration in relation to the EU. So are you now saying you're against 'freedom of movement'? Because that is open door and that's what I'm referring to. Ah, I see. You have qualified it. Now. Yes, you are right. I see no reason for the 2million British living in other EU countries to have restrictions placed on their movement which would rightly come into line with the restrictions you would have placed on those coming to the UK from France, Spain and the rest. Or is it a one-way street you want? What is your immigration policy then Kermit? Why do we need any sort of immigration controls? Well, first out of the door would be the South Africans and Zimbabweans. They have absolutely no need to be here. That'll free up around 300,000 pressure points on our services. Take it from there really. It is very entertaining having you and legaleagle wriggling away from answering very straightforward questions. Take note everyone and bear in mind when you read their next sanctimonious posts on immigration. I was being serious, man. That's 300,000 peeps. Do you think they should be allowed to stay? Bit hypocritical if 'yes' Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 04 Aug 15 10.33pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.23pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.20pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.08pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.05pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 9.32pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 8.45pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 8.42pm

Kermy only speaks for a minority of people....like the rest of the open door immigration supporters on here.

75 percent in England want reduced immigration....Hell even in Scotland.....It's 58 percent.....That's even with their far left nationalists in charge dibbling out their anti Ukip waffle.

They don't even represent the real views of the Scottish on the issue......God forbid what the numbers would be if more foreigners actually wanted to live in Scotland.

[Link]

I would be very interested if you could find a line on here from my hand that supports that assertion.

We have open door immigration in relation to the EU. So are you now saying you're against 'freedom of movement'?

Because that is open door and that's what I'm referring to.

Ah, I see. You have qualified it. Now.

Or is it a one-way street you want?

What is your immigration policy then Kermit? Why do we need any sort of immigration controls?

Well, first out of the door would be the South Africans and Zimbabweans. They have absolutely no need to be here. That'll free up around 300,000 pressure points on our services.

Take it from there really.

I was being serious, man. That's 300,000 peeps. Do you think they should be allowed to stay? Bit hypocritical if 'yes'

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

leggedstruggle Croydon 04 Aug 15 10.36pm
Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.33pm Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.23pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.20pm Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.08pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.05pm Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 9.32pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 8.45pm Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 8.42pm Kermy only speaks for a minority of people....like the rest of the open door immigration supporters on here. 75 percent in England want reduced immigration....Hell even in Scotland.....It's 58 percent.....That's even with their far left nationalists in charge dibbling out their anti Ukip waffle. They don't even represent the real views of the Scottish on the issue......God forbid what the numbers would be if more foreigners actually wanted to live in Scotland. [Link] I would be very interested if you could find a line on here from my hand that supports that assertion. We have open door immigration in relation to the EU. So are you now saying you're against 'freedom of movement'? Because that is open door and that's what I'm referring to. Ah, I see. You have qualified it. Now. Yes, you are right. I see no reason for the 2million British living in other EU countries to have restrictions placed on their movement which would rightly come into line with the restrictions you would have placed on those coming to the UK from France, Spain and the rest. Or is it a one-way street you want? What is your immigration policy then Kermit? Why do we need any sort of immigration controls? Well, first out of the door would be the South Africans and Zimbabweans. They have absolutely no need to be here. That'll free up around 300,000 pressure points on our services. Take it from there really. It is very entertaining having you and legaleagle wriggling away from answering very straightforward questions. Take note everyone and bear in mind when you read their next sanctimonious posts on immigration. I was being serious, man. That's 300,000 peeps. Do you think they should be allowed to stay? Bit hypocritical if 'yes' Are you referring to South Africans and Zimbabweans of all ethnic origins, or just the white ones? mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler
Alert a moderator to this post

leggedstruggle

Croydon 04 Aug 15 10.36pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.33pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.23pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.20pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.08pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.05pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 9.32pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 8.45pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 8.42pm

Kermy only speaks for a minority of people....like the rest of the open door immigration supporters on here.

75 percent in England want reduced immigration....Hell even in Scotland.....It's 58 percent.....That's even with their far left nationalists in charge dibbling out their anti Ukip waffle.

They don't even represent the real views of the Scottish on the issue......God forbid what the numbers would be if more foreigners actually wanted to live in Scotland.

[Link]

I would be very interested if you could find a line on here from my hand that supports that assertion.

We have open door immigration in relation to the EU. So are you now saying you're against 'freedom of movement'?

Because that is open door and that's what I'm referring to.

Ah, I see. You have qualified it. Now.

Or is it a one-way street you want?

What is your immigration policy then Kermit? Why do we need any sort of immigration controls?

Well, first out of the door would be the South Africans and Zimbabweans. They have absolutely no need to be here. That'll free up around 300,000 pressure points on our services.

Take it from there really.

I was being serious, man. That's 300,000 peeps. Do you think they should be allowed to stay? Bit hypocritical if 'yes'

Are you referring to South Africans and Zimbabweans of all ethnic origins, or just the white ones?

mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert a moderator to this post

leggedstruggle Croydon 04 Aug 15 10.38pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 10.29pm In short, on immigration the 'real left'....The 'Corbyn' left if you will.....Which to be honest is the core political position of most Labour activists, they have completely lost the argument on immigration with the British public. The people who actually have to live within the society that they want...the vast majority.... don't like their beliefs on immigration. So what you get in discussions with them is the old, 'wiggling on a pin head'.....arguments around the edges of the issue to avoid the central points......And of course good old fashioned denial. There are some old Labour people who recognise the fact that the working class suffer for these policies and that the only real winners are actually those looking for wage controls and corporations..... but they are drowned out by this bizarre fear within activists not to be regarded as agreeing with Ukip or being regarded as a racist. The left today are in a totally ridiculous position on immigration......Left behind by reality. Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Aug 2015 10.29pm) Excellent analysis. mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler
Alert a moderator to this post

leggedstruggle

Croydon 04 Aug 15 10.38pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 10.29pm

The people who actually have to live within the society that they want...the vast majority.... don't like their beliefs on immigration.

So what you get in discussions with them is the old, 'wiggling on a pin head'.....arguments around the edges of the issue to avoid the central points......And of course good old fashioned denial.

The left today are in a totally ridiculous position on immigration......Left behind by reality.

Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Aug 2015 10.29pm)

Excellent analysis.

mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle 04 Aug 15 10.38pm
Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 10.29pm In short, on immigration the 'real left'....The 'Corbyn' left if you will.....Which to be honest is the core political position of most Labour activists, they have completely lost the argument on immigration with the British public. The people who actually have to live within the society that they want...the vast majority.... don't like their beliefs on immigration. So what you get in discussions with them is the old, 'wiggling on a pin head'.....arguments around the edges of the issue to avoid the central points......And of course good old fashioned denial. There are some old Labour people who recognise the fact that the working class suffer for these policies and that the only real winners are actually those looking for wage controls and corporations..... but they are drowned out by this bizarre fear within activists not to be regarded as agreeing with Ukip or being regarded as a racist. The left today are in a totally ridiculous position on immigration......Left behind by reality. Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Aug 2015 10.29pm) What society is it that you say "they" want? Edited by legaleagle (04 Aug 2015 10.42pm)
Alert a moderator to this post

legaleagle

04 Aug 15 10.38pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 10.29pm

The people who actually have to live within the society that they want...the vast majority.... don't like their beliefs on immigration.

So what you get in discussions with them is the old, 'wiggling on a pin head'.....arguments around the edges of the issue to avoid the central points......And of course good old fashioned denial.

The left today are in a totally ridiculous position on immigration......Left behind by reality.

Edited by Stirlingsays (04 Aug 2015 10.29pm)

What society is it that you say "they" want?

Edited by legaleagle (04 Aug 2015 10.42pm)

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 04 Aug 15 10.42pm
Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.31pm The impracticality of that is, frankly, overwhelming. Cliff would have to leave his vineyard in Portugal and return to Surrey 24/7. Oh, and there is also the upheaval of the other 1,999,999 Brits to consider. Is that what you want? Or would they be allowed to stay and newcomers rejected? So family members or individuals would have to stay in the UK and not go and live in a place in the sun with their olds or, perhaps, potential spouses. And the jobs. Who will think of those who won't be allowed to migrate to work long term for companies across the channel even though they are the best qualified for it? The United States of America allows freedom of movement and internal migration. Works for them. We have a United States of Europe now. Can't see the point in trying to restrict movement here myself - very Iron Curtain - but there you go. Or don't as could be the case. You are creating problems that don't exist. I said, all countries should be able to control their borders. So here's the logic.....Any country can decide who they wish to keep and who they don't. Hence if Portugal want to keep economically useful people currently there.....Which of course they will....Then it is Portugal who decide. As for states rejecting those they don't wish within their countries.....Mmmmm....How is that state of being any different to how what existed before? It isn't......As for the upheaval of individuals who want to stay within countries that don't want them.....Tough. Live within the country of your birth.....If you want to be British then you can still become so....Follow the same rules that non EU residents follow.....Take a six month visa.....Find a company willing to offer you a work visa....Stay here for five years and apply for naturalization....Or if you fall in love with a British citizen and marry them.....Then that always qualifies......Basically the rules before 'freedom of movement'. What's so wrong about that? If an American has to do it...So should a Frenchie. The only situation where I would relax that is in cases of asylum where I would take a set number......This country has always believed in political asylum. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

04 Aug 15 10.42pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.31pm

And the jobs. Who will think of those who won't be allowed to migrate to work long term for companies across the channel even though they are the best qualified for it?

You are creating problems that don't exist.

I said, all countries should be able to control their borders. So here's the logic.....Any country can decide who they wish to keep and who they don't.

Hence if Portugal want to keep economically useful people currently there.....Which of course they will....Then it is Portugal who decide.

As for states rejecting those they don't wish within their countries.....Mmmmm....How is that state of being any different to how what existed before? It isn't......As for the upheaval of individuals who want to stay within countries that don't want them.....Tough. Live within the country of your birth.....If you want to be British then you can still become so....Follow the same rules that non EU residents follow.....Take a six month visa.....Find a company willing to offer you a work visa....Stay here for five years and apply for naturalization....Or if you fall in love with a British citizen and marry them.....Then that always qualifies......Basically the rules before 'freedom of movement'.

What's so wrong about that? If an American has to do it...So should a Frenchie.

The only situation where I would relax that is in cases of asylum where I would take a set number......This country has always believed in political asylum.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 04 Aug 15 10.45pm
Quote legaleagle at 04 Aug 2015 10.38pm What society is it that you say "they" want? Edited by legaleagle (04 Aug 2015 10.42pm) One that has reduced immigration.....That's the answer given. It isn't 'society' you believe in I know that.....I agree with the majority. How it is achieved......Well, that is open to debate. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

04 Aug 15 10.45pm

Quote legaleagle at 04 Aug 2015 10.38pm

What society is it that you say "they" want?

Edited by legaleagle (04 Aug 2015 10.42pm)

One that has reduced immigration.....That's the answer given.

It isn't 'society' you believe in I know that.....I agree with the majority.

How it is achieved......Well, that is open to debate.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8 Hevon 04 Aug 15 10.47pm
Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.36pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.33pm Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.23pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.20pm Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.08pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.05pm Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 9.32pm Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 8.45pm Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 8.42pm Kermy only speaks for a minority of people....like the rest of the open door immigration supporters on here. 75 percent in England want reduced immigration....Hell even in Scotland.....It's 58 percent.....That's even with their far left nationalists in charge dibbling out their anti Ukip waffle. They don't even represent the real views of the Scottish on the issue......God forbid what the numbers would be if more foreigners actually wanted to live in Scotland. [Link] I would be very interested if you could find a line on here from my hand that supports that assertion. We have open door immigration in relation to the EU. So are you now saying you're against 'freedom of movement'? Because that is open door and that's what I'm referring to. Ah, I see. You have qualified it. Now. Yes, you are right. I see no reason for the 2million British living in other EU countries to have restrictions placed on their movement which would rightly come into line with the restrictions you would have placed on those coming to the UK from France, Spain and the rest. Or is it a one-way street you want? What is your immigration policy then Kermit? Why do we need any sort of immigration controls? Well, first out of the door would be the South Africans and Zimbabweans. They have absolutely no need to be here. That'll free up around 300,000 pressure points on our services. Take it from there really. It is very entertaining having you and legaleagle wriggling away from answering very straightforward questions. Take note everyone and bear in mind when you read their next sanctimonious posts on immigration. I was being serious, man. That's 300,000 peeps. Do you think they should be allowed to stay? Bit hypocritical if 'yes' Are you referring to South Africans and Zimbabweans of all ethnic origins, or just the white ones? Yes all of them. I know the vast majority are white but that's irrelevant. Do you think they should be allowed to stay the 300,000 and tell us why 'yes' or 'no'? Big chest and massive boobs [Link]
Alert a moderator to this post

Kermit8

Hevon 04 Aug 15 10.47pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.36pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.33pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.23pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.20pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 04 Aug 2015 10.08pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 10.05pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 9.32pm

Quote Kermit8 at 04 Aug 2015 8.45pm

Quote Stirlingsays at 04 Aug 2015 8.42pm

Kermy only speaks for a minority of people....like the rest of the open door immigration supporters on here.

75 percent in England want reduced immigration....Hell even in Scotland.....It's 58 percent.....That's even with their far left nationalists in charge dibbling out their anti Ukip waffle.

They don't even represent the real views of the Scottish on the issue......God forbid what the numbers would be if more foreigners actually wanted to live in Scotland.

[Link]

I would be very interested if you could find a line on here from my hand that supports that assertion.

We have open door immigration in relation to the EU. So are you now saying you're against 'freedom of movement'?

Because that is open door and that's what I'm referring to.

Ah, I see. You have qualified it. Now.

Or is it a one-way street you want?

What is your immigration policy then Kermit? Why do we need any sort of immigration controls?

Well, first out of the door would be the South Africans and Zimbabweans. They have absolutely no need to be here. That'll free up around 300,000 pressure points on our services.

Take it from there really.

I was being serious, man. That's 300,000 peeps. Do you think they should be allowed to stay? Bit hypocritical if 'yes'

Are you referring to South Africans and Zimbabweans of all ethnic origins, or just the white ones?

Yes all of them. I know the vast majority are white but that's irrelevant. Do you think they should be allowed to stay the 300,000 and tell us why 'yes' or 'no'?

Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 14 of 85 < 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

No more immigrants.

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors