This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
chris123 hove actually 30 Jan 19 5.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
No, pro-brexit labour places will be the big losers, wasn't it always that way. I struggle to even get close to this - Brexit before Brexit?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 30 Jan 19 5.28pm | |
---|---|
I would think the minimum the EU would consider would be over the future arrangements, so I think that customs union would be of interest. The UK would be open over Gibraltar again and access to UK waters for fishing which slipped through last time. Really the EU can cope with no deal and should get rid of the UK, a complete pain in the a**e over so long. The EU can simply make no progress with the UK dragging it down perpetually. Politely, but firmly, UK 'on yer bike'. As for the 39 billion, well UK you are spending 56 billion on a railway, keep it and extend the line to Crewe.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 30 Jan 19 5.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
As for the 39 billion, well UK you are spending 56 billion on a railway, keep it and extend the line to Crewe.
Making sense as usual I see Steely. Railways can last for hundreds of years....How long does 39 billion last on our current contributions. Well, we were paying at least 14 billion a year in 2014. I think the most remainer friendly review of UK contributions to the EU put it that UK receives £1 for every £1.55 given. Others estimates aren't as generous.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Spiderman Horsham 30 Jan 19 5.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pussay Patrol
The point is you lose something tangible but what do you get in return? If there is belief or, as I suppose is common now, the buying into sensationalised tabloid stories about health tourism, then that is something the government should worry about, people like us shouldn't really give a toss Believe me it is real (not only from the EU) . Costs the NHS millions, very difficult to do anything about, believe me I do give a toss about it. Do you not have this problem in Holland?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 30 Jan 19 6.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
'Maybe I am missing something' B you certainly are, whether the UK could deliver on any revised withdrawal agreement, but also who are they dealing with, is it Mrs May the PM of the UK or of the conservative party ????????? Of course I am not certain just a voter after all and it depends on what concessions the EU offers. That was the point of last nights votes Parliament now has a way forward we may not like it and if the EU refuse to negotiate then it is irrelevant. The EU are playing chicken knowing that the deal as it stands will not get through Parliament. Now in your later post you suggest that maybe the EU just wants rid of us and I am sympathetic to that idea. You are correct that we have been holding the EU back every time they try to make changes. So if they actually want us to "crash out" then that attitude makes sense. If they genuinely want a deal then I think they run the risk of over playing their hand. Anyway there is posturing on both side so until a deal is agreed or negotiations are called off we should take public statements with a pinch of salt.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 30 Jan 19 6.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
Of course I am not certain just a voter after all and it depends on what concessions the EU offers. That was the point of last nights votes Parliament now has a way forward we may not like it and if the EU refuse to negotiate then it is irrelevant. The EU are playing chicken knowing that the deal as it stands will not get through Parliament. Now in your later post you suggest that maybe the EU just wants rid of us and I am sympathetic to that idea. You are correct that we have been holding the EU back every time they try to make changes. So if they actually want us to "crash out" then that attitude makes sense. If they genuinely want a deal then I think they run the risk of over playing their hand. Anyway there is posturing on both side so until a deal is agreed or negotiations are called off we should take public statements with a pinch of salt. I appreciate your genuine debate. Can't see anything good here B. Article 50 should never have been implemented, how amateur can it get, without any idea or plan of the future. Against all advice so I understand.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steve1984 30 Jan 19 8.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
No I was referring to the idea that recognising one's weaknesses is in fact a strength, whilst ploughing on as if you have the upper hand when in fact you're completely under the cosh is a weakness.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 30 Jan 19 8.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Believe me it is real (not only from the EU) . Costs the NHS millions, very difficult to do anything about, believe me I do give a toss about it. Do you not have this problem in Holland? A while ago on lbc someone from abroad had they said 5k of treatment.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 30 Jan 19 8.59pm | |
---|---|
Tony Blair: The backstop isn't the only flaw in the PM's Brexit deal. She's effectively saying 'Let's get on the train but we don't know the destination. We'll work it out after leaving'. We were always promised we'd know the future relationship with the EU before leaving. But we don't, a few weeks before some type of exit, we just don't have a clue. It's like moving house, but not knowing where your new address is. Nobody would do that, but leave would. So would the conservative party, parliament, the media, and there is no figure to step in and make us see sense.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 30 Jan 19 9.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Tony Blair: The backstop isn't the only flaw in the PM's Brexit deal. She's effectively saying 'Let's get on the train but we don't know the destination. We'll work it out after leaving'. We were always promised we'd know the future relationship with the EU before leaving. But we don't, a few weeks before some type of exit, we just don't have a clue. It's like moving house, but not knowing where your new address is. Nobody would do that, but leave would. So would the conservative party, parliament, the media, and there is no figure to step in and make us see sense.
I am not sure that is a fair comment by Blair. The EU laid down the rules of negotiation and flatly refused to discuss future relations with the UK until after we had agreed the process for disentangling ourselves from them. In fairness the government wanted to hold parallel talks on both topics which the EU rejected. Not for the first time Mr Blair is distorting things.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
davenotamonkey 31 Jan 19 12.44am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I am not sure that is a fair comment by Blair. In fairness the government wanted to hold parallel talks on both topics which the EU rejected. Not for the first time Mr Blair is distorting things. It's also deeply ironic, given the wonderful self-amending treaties his piece of s*** party signed us up to. 'Let's get on the train but we don't know the destination. We'll work it out after leaving' So, Remainers. What's the destination for the EU train you wanted us on? Is it the "Clegg Dangerous Fantasy" station? What station did all the Remainiacs on here vote to pull into, and why do you think you own the tracks that decide the route of the train, once you've agreed to board? When were you ever asked what your destination was? One thing is sure - with a Remain vote - there IS no "work it out after remaining". As Herr Juncker tells us: "there can be no democratic choice against the European (sic) treaties." It is always "more Europe". You just don't get to choose what that means. Thank f*** we pulled the emergency stop in time to get off. I'll take the car thanks. It's not stuck on rails to a destination I have no choice and no interest in.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
becky over the moon 31 Jan 19 6.03am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Tony Blair: The backstop isn't the only flaw in the PM's Brexit deal. She's effectively saying 'Let's get on the train but we don't know the destination. We'll work it out after leaving'. We were always promised we'd know the future relationship with the EU before leaving. But we don't, a few weeks before some type of exit, we just don't have a clue. It's like moving house, but not knowing where your new address is. Nobody would do that, but leave would. So would the conservative party, parliament, the media, and there is no figure to step in and make us see sense.
A stairway to Heaven and a Highway to Hell give some indication of expected traffic numbers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.