You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Stadium Redevelopment
November 25 2024 9.30pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Stadium Redevelopment

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 138 of 256 < 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 >

  

Direwolf Flag Lincoln 14 Feb 18 5.29pm Send a Private Message to Direwolf Add Direwolf as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by Jon1ukg

[Link]

To register your support for the development.

Ah - I see they've added an 'Other' category for respondent's now so that us non-local plebs can comment. Hurrah.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ARGILE OLD GEEZER Flag PORTIMAO 14 Feb 18 6.33pm Send a Private Message to ARGILE OLD GEEZER Add ARGILE OLD GEEZER as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger


This might be a daft question but why can't Palace compensate the council for the housing and rehouse the occupants in existing private housing?

Seems damn logical to me

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
gloryhunter Flag EDINBURGH 14 Feb 18 7.05pm Send a Private Message to gloryhunter Add gloryhunter as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by ARGILE OLD GEEZER

Seems damn logical to me

I think the council housing stock has to remain the same size/numbers so they won't take money, they want a house for a house.

 

gloryhunter (eagle in exile)
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
bexleydave Flag Barnehurst 14 Feb 18 7.31pm Send a Private Message to bexleydave Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add bexleydave as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by gloryhunter

I think the council housing stock has to remain the same size/numbers so they won't take money, they want a house for a house.


It has nothing whatsoever to do with council (actually called social) housing stock. The total number of houses in a borough has to remain, at least, the same if houses are demolished for redevelopment, and it's the developer's responsibility to ensure that happens with new build properties, equivalent or better than those demolished. This is not that hard to understand FFS!

 

Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
bicycle repair man 14 Feb 18 8.44pm Send a Private Message to bicycle repair man Add bicycle repair man as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by Direwolf

I see that the club is now encouraging us to comment in support of the new stadium on the council website. I posted earlier in this thread that I tried this and I could not do so as the website restricts comment to people in certain categories. Being a Palace supporter is strangely not one of them! So unless you are a neighbour or member of the Residents Association I don't think that you can comment. Anyone else tried so far?

Anyone can comment.
Just select "other".

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
richard shaw (og)65 Flag my minds eye 15 Feb 18 10.10am Send a Private Message to richard shaw (og)65 Add richard shaw (og)65 as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by bicycle repair man

Anyone can comment.
Just select "other".


correct , i just did it .

scrolling through randomly i only saw 1 objection , from some git in kent

 

interviewer " iggy , do you think you influenced anybody?"
iggy pop " I think I wiped out the 60`S "

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards Hrolf The Ganger Flag 15 Feb 18 10.42am Send a Private Message to Hrolf The Ganger Add Hrolf The Ganger as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by richard shaw (og)65


correct , i just did it .

scrolling through randomly i only saw 1 objection , from some git in kent

Probably a Charlton fan. I noticed one objection from someone in Bermondsey, ha ha ha.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
topcat Flag Holmesdale / Surbiton 15 Feb 18 10.53am Send a Private Message to topcat Add topcat as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Probably a Charlton fan. I noticed one objection from someone in Bermondsey, ha ha ha.

And one from Sussex. Jealous, no doubt.

 

It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Aray Flag South London 15 Feb 18 11.01am Send a Private Message to Aray Add Aray as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by bexleydave

You're completely missing the point here. If a development requires the demolition of residential property, the developer is required to new build the same number of, at leat, equivalent houses in the borough, not buy up existing properties and hand them over, or indeed give the council the money to build the new houses. The club has to obtain the land, get planning permission and erect six new builds.

Not for the first time Dave! Thanks for taking the time to explain.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Eaglecoops Flag CR3 15 Feb 18 11.22am Send a Private Message to Eaglecoops Add Eaglecoops as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Originally posted by bexleydave


It has nothing whatsoever to do with council (actually called social) housing stock. The total number of houses in a borough has to remain, at least, the same if houses are demolished for redevelopment, and it's the developer's responsibility to ensure that happens with new build properties, equivalent or better than those demolished. This is not that hard to understand FFS!


The procedure followed is also designed to protect the council from themselves. You just wait and see where a couple of million quid goes if a developer gives that to a Council for development purposes instead of providing the housing!

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Penge Eagle Flag Beckenham 15 Feb 18 10.55pm Send a Private Message to Penge Eagle Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Penge Eagle as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

The planning documents are a good read [Link]

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
veterancpsup Flag Pimlico 16 Feb 18 6.42pm Send a Private Message to veterancpsup Add veterancpsup as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Stadium plans' by bexleydave

Why do Croydon Council consider themselves to be experts on architectural design. We will get a stadium designed by committee.

 
Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 138 of 256 < 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > Stadium Redevelopment