They shouldn't.

Wouldn't want anyone here damaging their precious biases by having a sudden rush of wrong thinking.

So we agree it's mainly muslim men envolved in these child grooming rape gangs? There is our "FACT". Agreed?

Of course it's not agreed. What we can agree is that from the photos and their names it appears that a majority of those involved are likely to have originated from within a community that largely adhered to one of the Islamic faiths. Whether they are all practising now, or lapsed is unknown. That it is irrelevant to the crime is certain.

It's mine and alot of people's "OPINION" that if you take I minority group in the UK "FACT" who are over welmingly the main perpetrators "FACT" then we have an issue.

Neither are actually facts. They are assumptions. The issue is because you treat them as facts.

So far no "BIASS" Agreed?

Of course not. It's 100% bias.

As a responsible country and duty bound to potential child victim's of future rape, should we not be looking at these groups (Asian men) "NO BIASS" and understand WHY ?

Is it the culture ?
Is it the religion ?

That is a different issue. Of course as a country we need to be studying these problems and taking every possible step to eradicate them. We need to insist that our standards are understood and kept by all. What mustn't happen is to confuse two separate issues.

Because white and black people aren't doing this and they arnt sharing the same culture and religion.

Culture and religion are not the problem. Behaviour is the problem. So long as people behave within our laws then they are free to believe whatever they like.

I don't think it's right for you to call out "biass" when we have innocent little girls being rapped, I think it's actually rather sick.

I have always condemned the behaviour and do so again. My argument is, and has always been, that describing people carelessly has the potential to make things worse. If no positive benefit can be seen from the careless words why risk them? Helping the victims and preventing others from becoming victims has to be the primary focus.

Oh I understand and enjoy satire very much.

Satire though has to have a sharp edge of truth in it to be effective. That had none.

I haven’t read the entire thread but have the last 4 pages or so with interest...

I will say as a recently retired policeman of 18 years that the Police have and do shall we say ‘address things’ differently when it comes to any other race except white British or any other religion except Christianity....

Read into that what you will..

I wasn't commenting on my posts.

I do enjoy Noel Coward though.

In a figurative kind of way!