Coronavirus and the impact of Lockdown policy

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Coronavirus and the impact of Lockdown policy

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Page 134 of 289 < 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 >

Mattconrov 07 Aug 23 4.54pm
Originally posted by eaglesdare At the end of the day I like so many others made informed decisions about the the safety of our own bodies whether to get the jab or not. This decision affected absolutely no one else. We made it through psychological warfare. Some people got the jab, there's no problem there I respect your decision. Some people got it and decided not to get the boosters after seeing the or having side effects on themselves or other people. No problem there. Some people continue to get the boosters. No problem there. We all make informed decisions about our own body. Some of us just want the question to be asked about excess deaths. All we call for is an investigation. What's wrong with that? That makes total commonsense to me. You and me want people to have the Freedom to choose. Others want the freedom to impose what they want on others. They of course will say it's for the greater good. I strongly recommend watch some Mattias Desmet. He speaks eloquently on mass formation psychosis. Explains perfectly how the majority fall for these scams. Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 5.01pm) " You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.
Alert a moderator to this post

Mattconrov

07 Aug 23 4.54pm

Originally posted by eaglesdare

At the end of the day I like so many others made informed decisions about the the safety of our own bodies whether to get the jab or not. This decision affected absolutely no one else.

We made it through psychological warfare.

Some people got the jab, there's no problem there I respect your decision. Some people got it and decided not to get the boosters after seeing the or having side effects on themselves or other people. No problem there. Some people continue to get the boosters. No problem there. We all make informed decisions about our own body.

Some of us just want the question to be asked about excess deaths. All we call for is an investigation. What's wrong with that?

That makes total commonsense to me. You and me want people to have the Freedom to choose. Others want the freedom to impose what they want on others. They of course will say it's for the greater good. I strongly recommend watch some Mattias Desmet. He speaks eloquently on mass formation psychosis. Explains perfectly how the majority fall for these scams.

Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 5.01pm)

" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 07 Aug 23 4.56pm
Originally posted by Mattconrov I've been accused of not being balanced. However if these simple questions have never been entertained by our government.Then they will be asked. The government and the media conspired to close down free and balanced speech. So how dare anyone call me unbalanced. There were plenty of experts who held opposing views. (See the great Barrington declaration) but how many of those were on our TV screens? It just gets so boring that the conspiracy tag gets thrown about so easily. Science is about questioning things. Nowadays you get called a conspiracy nut for that. With the exact pandemic scenario being played out by event 201 describing what has transpired. I think someone knew exactly what they were doing Stirling. Indeed. Much of what happened was just an implicit display of just how low quality this current generation of elites are. We are ruled by First Division relegation battlers. And as is shown those teams will still have their fervent masochistic supporters. Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Aug 2023 4.57pm) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

07 Aug 23 4.56pm

Originally posted by Mattconrov

I've been accused of not being balanced. However if these simple questions have never been entertained by our government.Then they will be asked. The government and the media conspired to close down free and balanced speech. So how dare anyone call me unbalanced.

There were plenty of experts who held opposing views. (See the great Barrington declaration) but how many of those were on our TV screens?

It just gets so boring that the conspiracy tag gets thrown about so easily. Science is about questioning things. Nowadays you get called a conspiracy nut for that.

With the exact pandemic scenario being played out by event 201 describing what has transpired. I think someone knew exactly what they were doing Stirling.

Indeed.

Much of what happened was just an implicit display of just how low quality this current generation of elites are.

We are ruled by First Division relegation battlers. And as is shown those teams will still have their fervent masochistic supporters.

Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Aug 2023 4.57pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Mattconrov 07 Aug 23 4.58pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays Indeed. Much of what happened was just an implicit display of just how low quality this current generation of elites are. We are ruled by First Division relegation battlers. And as is shown those teams will still have their fervent masochistic supporters. Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Aug 2023 4.57pm) I say the world is run by idiots but ruled by psychopaths. But there's no need to bring Crystal palace into it. Lol Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 5.05pm) " You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.
Alert a moderator to this post

Mattconrov

07 Aug 23 4.58pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Indeed.

Much of what happened was just an implicit display of just how low quality this current generation of elites are.

We are ruled by First Division relegation battlers. And as is shown those teams will still have their fervent masochistic supporters.

Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Aug 2023 4.57pm)

I say the world is run by idiots but ruled by psychopaths. But there's no need to bring Crystal palace into it. Lol

Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 5.05pm)

" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 07 Aug 23 5.05pm
Originally posted by Mattconrov I say the world is run by idiots but ruled by psychopaths In many cases the kind of person who most wants to rule and be in charge is often quite unsuitable for the job. Narcissism and hubris are frequent companion travellers. Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Aug 2023 5.09pm) 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

07 Aug 23 5.05pm

Originally posted by Mattconrov

I say the world is run by idiots but ruled by psychopaths

In many cases the kind of person who most wants to rule and be in charge is often quite unsuitable for the job.

Narcissism and hubris are frequent companion travellers.

Edited by Stirlingsays (07 Aug 2023 5.09pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Mattconrov 07 Aug 23 5.08pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays In many cases the kind of person who wants most wants to rule and be in charge is often the least suitable for the job. Narcissism and hubris are frequent travellers. Which is why I find it strange that an intelligent man like Mr Wisbech believes so much in the government. As much as I disagree with him he ain't stupid. Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 5.11pm) " You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.
Alert a moderator to this post

Mattconrov

07 Aug 23 5.08pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

In many cases the kind of person who wants most wants to rule and be in charge is often the least suitable for the job.

Narcissism and hubris are frequent travellers.

Which is why I find it strange that an intelligent man like Mr Wisbech believes so much in the government. As much as I disagree with him he ain't stupid.

Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 5.11pm)

" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 07 Aug 23 5.10pm
Originally posted by Mattconrov Which is why I find it strange that an intelligent man like Mr Wisbech believes so much the government. As much as I disagree with him he ain't stupid. Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 5.09pm) It's not hard to work it out after a while. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

07 Aug 23 5.10pm

Originally posted by Mattconrov

Which is why I find it strange that an intelligent man like Mr Wisbech believes so much the government. As much as I disagree with him he ain't stupid.

Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 5.09pm)

It's not hard to work it out after a while.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Mattconrov 07 Aug 23 5.13pm
Originally posted by Stirlingsays It's not hard to work it out after a while. I've been amused and educated by your debates with him from the past. Admired your work from a far. I thought it was time to get involved. " You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.
Alert a moderator to this post

Mattconrov

07 Aug 23 5.13pm

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

It's not hard to work it out after a while.

I've been amused and educated by your debates with him from the past. Admired your work from a far. I thought it was time to get involved.

" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.

Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays 07 Aug 23 5.16pm
Originally posted by Mattconrov I've been amused and educated by your debates with him from the past. Admired your work from a far. I thought it was time to get involved. I tip my hat sir. 'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)
Alert a moderator to this post

Stirlingsays

07 Aug 23 5.16pm

Originally posted by Mattconrov

I've been amused and educated by your debates with him from the past. Admired your work from a far. I thought it was time to get involved.

I tip my hat sir.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert a moderator to this post

Mattconrov 07 Aug 23 5.51pm
Testing... testing ... 123 Testing links ...... [Link] Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 6.27pm) " You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.
Alert a moderator to this post

Mattconrov

07 Aug 23 5.51pm

Testing... testing ... 123

Testing links ......

[Link]

Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 6.27pm)

" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.

Alert a moderator to this post

Mattconrov 07 Aug 23 6.49pm
Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 6.51pm)[/smal [Link] Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 6.59pm) Edited by Mattconrov (08 Aug 2023 10.57am) " You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.
Alert a moderator to this post

Mattconrov

07 Aug 23 6.49pm

Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 6.51pm)[/smal

[Link]

Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 6.59pm)

Edited by Mattconrov (08 Aug 2023 10.57am)

" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.

Alert a moderator to this post

SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 07 Aug 23 7.31pm
Originally posted by Mattconrov Ok so no proof that it was novel. Just established as we know so don't ask.Mike yeadon has something to say on whether viruses cause infection. I'd suggest he may know a thing or two about it. Unaware to how modern criteria has confirmed sars cov 2 causes covid 19. I've not seen the evidence. With regards to the sustained death rate. Many of those coming from care homes in march/April of 2020. Around the time heavy doses of midazolam were being administered. Overall I think about 25 thousand extra deaths for 2020. Not a good thing. But to lock down the country and to cause far more deaths and problems now is not good. Your may say with hindsight etc we may have done things differently. But many of us knew at the time. Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 4.17pm) Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 4.20pm) 'Many of us knew at the time' Come on. You're also falling back on classic conspiracy tactics and patterns already, which is a shame. Interested to know why it being novel or not is of such importance. If there's no proof as you say then why are you so sure it exists at all or is even 'established'? What's the criteria. It's been declared by multiple sources as novel using more up to date methods than those you've floated from 1890, and again if it wasn't it would be a very hard thing to keep secret or cover up (see previous post re. this point again). Not even sure what the benefit of doing so would be anyway. Even if it wasn't the same money and investment would be needed to counteract it if it had the same level of effectiveness as COVID did at the beginning. Maybe do some independent reading beyond your usual sources and cross reference to come to a conclusion? My previous post already contains a pretty good starting point. But ultimately you can lead a horse to water, etc. I've always found it fascinating that you guys talk about the importance of reading around the subject and forming ones own conclusions, then proceed to parrot off regurgitated information from one or a very limited scope of alternate sources. Campbell, Yeadon. Always one name never multiple people and credible references from different sources. Basically the exact opposite of scientific scrutiny. So death rate – now something else caused most of them? Midazolam? Believe what you want to believe, but I go with objectivity and probability every time rather than putting one egg in my basket. Otherwise there be dragons. Or maybe Lizards? Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.
Alert a moderator to this post

SW19 CPFC

Addiscombe West 07 Aug 23 7.31pm

Originally posted by Mattconrov

Ok so no proof that it was novel. Just established as we know so don't ask.Mike yeadon has something to say on whether viruses cause infection. I'd suggest he may know a thing or two about it.

Unaware to how modern criteria has confirmed sars cov 2 causes covid 19. I've not seen the evidence.

With regards to the sustained death rate. Many of those coming from care homes in march/April of 2020. Around the time heavy doses of midazolam were being administered. Overall I think about 25 thousand extra deaths for 2020. Not a good thing. But to lock down the country and to cause far more deaths and problems now is not good. Your may say with hindsight etc we may have done things differently. But many of us knew at the time.

Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 4.17pm)

Edited by Mattconrov (07 Aug 2023 4.20pm)

'Many of us knew at the time'

Come on.

You're also falling back on classic conspiracy tactics and patterns already, which is a shame.

Interested to know why it being novel or not is of such importance. If there's no proof as you say then why are you so sure it exists at all or is even 'established'? What's the criteria.

It's been declared by multiple sources as novel using more up to date methods than those you've floated from 1890, and again if it wasn't it would be a very hard thing to keep secret or cover up (see previous post re. this point again). Not even sure what the benefit of doing so would be anyway. Even if it wasn't the same money and investment would be needed to counteract it if it had the same level of effectiveness as COVID did at the beginning.

Maybe do some independent reading beyond your usual sources and cross reference to come to a conclusion? My previous post already contains a pretty good starting point. But ultimately you can lead a horse to water, etc.

I've always found it fascinating that you guys talk about the importance of reading around the subject and forming ones own conclusions, then proceed to parrot off regurgitated information from one or a very limited scope of alternate sources.

Campbell, Yeadon. Always one name never multiple people and credible references from different sources. Basically the exact opposite of scientific scrutiny.

So death rate – now something else caused most of them? Midazolam?

Believe what you want to believe, but I go with objectivity and probability every time rather than putting one egg in my basket. Otherwise there be dragons. Or maybe Lizards?

Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

Alert a moderator to this post

Mattconrov 07 Aug 23 8.04pm
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC 'Many of us knew at the time' Come on. You're also falling back on classic conspiracy tactics and patterns already, which is a shame. Interested to know why it being novel or not is of such importance. If there's no proof as you say then why are you so sure it exists at all or is even 'established'? What's the criteria. It's been declared by multiple sources as novel using more up to date methods than those you've floated from 1890, and again if it wasn't it would be a very hard thing to keep secret or cover up (see previous post re. this point again). Not even sure what the benefit of doing so would be anyway. Even if it wasn't the same money and investment would be needed to counteract it if it had the same level of effectiveness as COVID did at the beginning. Maybe do some independent reading beyond your usual sources and cross reference to come to a conclusion? My previous post already contains a pretty good starting point. But ultimately you can lead a horse to water, etc. I've always found it fascinating that you guys talk about the importance of reading around the subject and forming ones own conclusions, then proceed to parrot off regurgitated information from one or a very limited scope of alternate sources. Campbell, Yeadon. Always one name never multiple people and credible references from different sources. Basically the exact opposite of scientific scrutiny. So death rate – now something else caused most of them? Midazolam? Believe what you want to believe, but I go with objectivity and probability every time rather than putting one egg in my basket. Otherwise there be dragons. Or maybe Lizards? Only one name mate. Check out the video in the link. He's a few more Robert Malone, Peter mccoulloughh Dolaris Cahill, sucharit bhakdi. More to come.why don't you try some independent reading. Your ideas about "us" are all in your head. Midazolam? proves my point. Look it up if the search engine goes behond the BBC. Edited by Mattconrov (08 Aug 2023 11.22am) " You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.
Alert a moderator to this post

Mattconrov

07 Aug 23 8.04pm

Originally posted by SW19 CPFC

'Many of us knew at the time'

Come on.

You're also falling back on classic conspiracy tactics and patterns already, which is a shame.

Interested to know why it being novel or not is of such importance. If there's no proof as you say then why are you so sure it exists at all or is even 'established'? What's the criteria.

Campbell, Yeadon. Always one name never multiple people and credible references from different sources. Basically the exact opposite of scientific scrutiny.

So death rate – now something else caused most of them? Midazolam?

Believe what you want to believe, but I go with objectivity and probability every time rather than putting one egg in my basket. Otherwise there be dragons. Or maybe Lizards?

Only one name mate. Check out the video in the link. He's a few more Robert Malone, Peter mccoulloughh Dolaris Cahill, sucharit bhakdi. More to come.why don't you try some independent reading. Your ideas about "us" are all in your head. Midazolam? proves my point. Look it up if the search engine goes behond the BBC.

Edited by Mattconrov (08 Aug 2023 11.22am)

" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.

Alert a moderator to this post

Page 134 of 289 < 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

Crystal Palace FC Supporters' Website - The Holmesdale Online

Coronavirus and the impact of Lockdown policy

Site Map

New users

Existing users

Sponsors