This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
steeleye20 Croydon 26 Oct 22 3.01pm | |
---|---|
A brexit damage assessment video from the Fiancial Times
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 26 Oct 22 3.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
Obviously leaving the EU has made us poorer and impacted growth, it cannot logically be any other way.
But you are against capitalism so why would you care? Once again, if we were in the EU we would be giving our gas away and you wouldn't have had your beloved vaccines first because you'd have had to share both. I can only say that once again, the majority of people who voted against the EU did so for either the assertion of political independence or against the immigration policies of that political cartel......it wasn't a vote about, 'line go up'.....which is a joke anyway as all these politicians, foreign or domestic, have done nothing but destroy the financial future. And your beloved left would have borrowed even more and all the rich investment, which you seem to think are just going to stay and hand over your pension, would have fecked off. What gets me is that these ideas have been tried multiple times and never ended in anything other than greater misery for the most vulnerable....most recently in France....All that ended up giving them is Macron because all the money fled....Maybe that's what you really want. Edited by Stirlingsays (26 Oct 2022 3.39pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 26 Oct 22 3.23pm | |
---|---|
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 26 Oct 22 3.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
But you are against capitalism so why would you care? Once again, if we were in the EU we would be giving our gas away and you wouldn't have had your beloved vaccines first because you'd have had to share both. I can only say that once again, the majority of people who voted against the EU did so for either the assertion of political independence or against the immigration policies of that political cartel......it wasn't a vote about, 'line go up'.....which is a joke anyway as all these politicians, foreign or domestic, have done nothing but destroy the financial future. That was always my interpretation or assumption. I don't ever quite get the 'Look at the trade, travel etc. implications of Brexit' argument. It's pretty much a solo conversation. I was of the belief that most Brexit voters had done so as a resounding rejection of the open door immigration policy and amalgamation with the likes of nowheresville in Eastern Europe etc and the belief that Britain will always be able to handle herself and need not any potential negative consequences for relinquishing self governance and determination. Whilst perhaps not all are as well research or invested in the 'Globalism' hypothesis as yourself Stirling I think there was a semi, if not subconscious acknowledgement and complete rejection of this. Hasn't stopped politicians still doing politician things mind you but at least it provided some demonstrable resistance.
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 26 Oct 22 3.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Nicholas91
That was always my interpretation or assumption. I don't ever quite get the 'Look at the trade, travel etc. implications of Brexit' argument. It's pretty much a solo conversation. I was of the belief that most Brexit voters had done so as a resounding rejection of the open door immigration policy and amalgamation with the likes of nowheresville in Eastern Europe etc and the belief that Britain will always be able to handle herself and need not any potential negative consequences for relinquishing self governance and determination. Whilst perhaps not all are as well research or invested in the 'Globalism' hypothesis as yourself Stirling I think there was a semi, if not subconscious acknowledgement and complete rejection of this. Hasn't stopped politicians still doing politician things mind you but at least it provided some demonstrable resistance. Indeed Nick, I'd say that's an accurate summary.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 26 Oct 22 4.00pm | |
---|---|
My point about brexit is more practical. Where are we now, it is plainly detrimental made us poorer and damaged growth. If Rashi Sunook is a realist unlike the other tories we have had, he has to repair our EU trading and political relationship. Going back in is not yet feasible but rejoining the single market and customs union is hopefully possible, but a whole new attitude from the UK is the key. I see only failure from Tories and Labour, Starmer is wrong, the tories we know, now locked into 2019 is wrong imo. The Truss disaster is primarily brexit in action for really the first time proper we see reality, the rest has been a general downhill slide since leaving that is working its way through. There seems to be a conspiracy of silence over brexit, everybody shies away from any mention, and the conclusion I take is that the UK wants to brush it away under the carpet, as though it never happened. The reason is obvious, nobody wants to own a failure. I am not interested in leaving or remaining, but resolving.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 26 Oct 22 4.04pm | |
---|---|
It's like a different language. Might as well be talking about train stations. I suppose we should all just accept that most remainers and leavers don't give a feck about addressing why either voted how they did. So like the anti EU crowd had to put up with being denied a vote for forty years the shoe is just on the other foot in this regard. But oh...now suddenly changing it all matters....Yet they didn't give a feck before. Edited by Stirlingsays (26 Oct 2022 4.09pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 26 Oct 22 4.10pm | |
---|---|
How I see it Merkel fecked the remainers when she refused to give Cameron anything on freedom of movement. The remainers thought they could still win....so did most of the pundits. They gambled. They lost. We move on. Edited by Stirlingsays (26 Oct 2022 4.11pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 26 Oct 22 4.15pm | |
---|---|
You can't cherry pick. If I remember correctly the EU already said in 2016 and after that you can't be out of the EU and in the single market......though I acknowledge that certain non EU countries do have bespoke situations...but they were set up during very different times.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nead1 26 Oct 22 9.01pm | |
---|---|
Norway is an example of a country in the Single Mkt but not a member of the EU; I think I am right in saying that other EEA countries might have a similar model. That kind of Norway option was open to the UK but dismissed in the red lines Theresa May set out very early in the process much to the amazement of the EU negotiators. Even with that, she couldn't get a softer withdrawal agreement through her own party which had been overtaken by the Brexit fundamentalists. I have long believed that the economic affects of all this would come home to bite us and that certainly looks like it is happening; the FT analysis posted earlier is a very good one and they are known for their accurate reporting. Indeed, one Boris Johnson, used to copy their material as a lazy Times/Telegraph journalist when he was in Brussels. I feel certain Sunak and Hunt are well aware of the realities of the situation so it will be really interesting to see if there is a softening in the UK approach; if I was betting on it, I think there will be given the major economic and political problems they are having to deal with which in many ways can all be traced back to 2016.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Elpis In a pub 27 Oct 22 8.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
My point about brexit is more practical. Where are we now, it is plainly detrimental made us poorer and damaged growth. The stats would show otherwise . Growth (apart form covid 2020) has followed trends of leading economic nations . Everyone in Europe is poorer ,staying in the EU would not have changed that . In General though the negative aspects of Brexit (Customs checks) were always going to be immediately seen , the benefits of trade deals to come will obviously not be seen till later . The Tory Brexit has been a poorly led one ,I think whatever way we saw it in 2016 we would have hoped for a smoother transition .
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 27 Oct 22 1.41pm | |
---|---|
I am with you Stirling.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.