Don’t need aNI number working in the black economy and many GOs will treat people without asking if they are entitled to NHS treatment

Trouble is Spidy that a lot of people on here think that everybody plays by the rules and therefore any questioning of a persons status is automatically right wing or racist. I remember back when Labour were in power, there was a phone in about over crowding in doctors surgeries and I think Peterborough was the area of the topic. Anyway, the government representative in the studio provided the figure for the number of asylum seekers that were housed in the area. Trouble is a doctor from the area phoned in to say that he had more than that on his books alone, and he obviously he wasn’t the only surgery in the area. Apparently the discrepancy must be down to a timing issue of the data…
Basically there are likely considerably more people in this country than the official figures dictate, with or without NI numbers, each requiring some form of public service without putting anything in. An amnesty will be the only option left to the government in the end thereby proving that crime does pay.

hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.

I understand both of those points. They are true.

The point though is that you cannot hope to hide for ever. Eventually, and often quite soon, you come against a situation in which your identity is going to be revealed.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Latest from Sweden

[Link]

"This is not Sweden. This is not what Sweden is supposed to be" Leader of the Social Democrat Party

"Nearly one fifth of Sweden's 10.5 million population were born abroad"

Abba's "I Have A Dream" song didn't turn out so well.

Living down here does have some advantages. At least you can see them cry.

As was stated there is no evidence of it being official policy, just accepted practice.

The Mail was using a right wing think tank’s FOI request and then suggested that because paragraphs had been removed from a draft there was some kind of sinister manipulation going on.

So although the implemented practice might be as described the reason why hasn’t been accurately reported. The Mail is a tabloid rag pretending to be a newspaper.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

This old Chesnut again! He didn't actually say that did he?

Neather stated that his words had been twisted: "The main goal was to allow in more migrant workers at a point when—hard as it is to imagine now—the booming economy was running up against skills shortages. Somehow this has become distorted by excitable Right-wing newspaper columnists into being a "plot" to make Britain multicultural. There was no plot".

In other words the Telegraph were doing pretty much the same as the Mail. Winding up the right! That it seems to have succeeded doesn't make it true.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.