This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Why is this a BBC top story? (LOCKED)
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Teddy Eagle  26 Feb 20 8.13pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
There certainly must be some kind of linkage causing a domino effect. I have little doubt the Police, and maybe even the security forces, will be investigating that aspect. We can only hope so and also that the victims are getting all the help they need.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
Wisbech Eagle  Truro Cornwall 26 Feb 20 8.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
But it was factual wasn’t it? If you read the report you would know it wasn't.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 26 Feb 20 8.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
We can only hope so and also that the victims are getting all the help they need. On that we can certainly agree.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 26 Feb 20 8.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I'll leave SS to go round his endless circle in the hope he finds his promised land somewhere on the way. There's little point in trying to reason with anyone quite as supercilious as he is.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dannyboy1978 26 Feb 20 9.46pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
What religion the individual criminals claim to believe in doesn't affect the fact that it isn't Islam in the dock. It's the individual criminal. Society needs to stop using terms that taint the innocent by association whilst always condemning the guilty. I'm sorry but Islam is in the dock and I will listen to the experts over you pal. Edited by dannyboy1978 (26 Feb 2020 9.46pm)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 26 Feb 20 10.30pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by dannyboy1978
I'm sorry but Islam is in the dock and I will listen to the experts over you pal. Edited by dannyboy1978 (26 Feb 2020 9.46pm) That article is about "Islamic terrorism" which is an entirely different subject to the grooming gangs. We all know that there is a very serious problem with those who have been radicalised. It's related to the growth of ISIS and their fundamentalist attitudes. Most people understand that and don't associate it with mainstream Islam. Nevertheless although the article, and all similar ones, refer to "Islamic terrorism" I would prefer that we called it what it really is, which is "Fundamentalist terrorism".
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cryrst  The garden of England 26 Feb 20 10.57pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That article is about "Islamic terrorism" which is an entirely different subject to the grooming gangs. We all know that there is a very serious problem with those who have been radicalised. It's related to the growth of ISIS and their fundamentalist attitudes. Most people understand that and don't associate it with mainstream Islam. Nevertheless although the article, and all similar ones, refer to "Islamic terrorism" I would prefer that we called it what it really is, which is "Fundamentalist terrorism". You are a weirdo.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Midlands Eagle 27 Feb 20 6.09am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Untrue. They should be called "organised gangs of child molesting criminals". Only if every Muslim in the UK was involved should the term "Muslim" be used. So by that token if a section of Palace and Brighton fans started fighting they shouldn't be called "Palace and Brighton fans" as not every Palace or Brighton fan in the UK was involved
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| dannyboy1978 27 Feb 20 6.48am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That article is about "Islamic terrorism" which is an entirely different subject to the grooming gangs. We all know that there is a very serious problem with those who have been radicalised. It's related to the growth of ISIS and their fundamentalist attitudes. Most people understand that and don't associate it with mainstream Islam. Nevertheless although the article, and all similar ones, refer to "Islamic terrorism" I would prefer that we called it what it really is, which is "Fundamentalist terrorism". A fundamentalist is a person from a specific group, in this case it's Islam. Why you so scared to call that group by their name.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| cryrst The garden of England 27 Feb 20 7.06am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That article is about "Islamic terrorism" which is an entirely different subject to the grooming gangs. We all know that there is a very serious problem with those who have been radicalised. It's related to the growth of ISIS and their fundamentalist attitudes. Most people understand that and don't associate it with mainstream Islam. Nevertheless although the article, and all similar ones, refer to "Islamic terrorism" I would prefer that we called it what it really is, which is "Fundamentalist terrorism". Most people understand you say.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 27 Feb 20 9.14am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by cryrst
Most people understand you say. It ought to be obvious. A better question is why should they? What does it achieve? Positive or negative results?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 27 Feb 20 9.26am |
 |
|---|---|
|
Here WE rather lays himself bare here. It's not about whether it's positive or negative. It's about what is true. Lies cannot hold.....He stated on here some time ago that if a lie is effective then it's useful. No it isn't. A lie, may get you out of a tight spot but like the quote from Lincoln goes....'You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you can not fool all of the people all of the time.' Ultimately people need the truth....Whether they want it or not...But unfortunately with WE they aren't going to get that.....because he's interested in what's positive. Edited by Stirlingsays (27 Feb 2020 9.32am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.