You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > The Wilfried Zaha Thread
November 25 2024 10.41pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

The Wilfried Zaha Thread

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 131 of 495 < 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 >

  

bexleydave Flag Barnehurst 04 Feb 19 11.38am Send a Private Message to bexleydave Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add bexleydave as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by chris123

He has to respond to the charge by tomorrow I think.


Oh right, thanks for the update.

 


Bexley Dave

Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing!

"The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Midlands Eagle Flag 04 Feb 19 11.47am Send a Private Message to Midlands Eagle Add Midlands Eagle as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by bexleydave


I'd have thought we'd have heard by now, if it was more than one match. It'd be very unfair if we had to begin this week's training not knowing availability for Saturday.

What's "fair" got to do with it as it's the FA we're talking about

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
topcat Flag Holmesdale / Surbiton 04 Feb 19 11.54am Send a Private Message to topcat Add topcat as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle

He has been charged and will be found guilty (the FA have an amazingly high percentage found guilty, not sure what it is now but it used to under half a percent were found not guilty).

The question will be how long the ban is rather than if there is an additional ban. Two matches on the naughty step is my guess.

 


It's 106 miles to Chicago, we got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it's dark... and we're wearing sunglasses.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Badger11 Flag Beckenham 04 Feb 19 11.54am Send a Private Message to Badger11 Add Badger11 as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by Midlands Eagle

What's "fair" got to do with it as it's the FA we're talking about

Talking of fair Ashley Barnes is booked for diving (it was a penalty) he then has a prolonged rant at the linesman and the referee and doesn't get a second yellow.

Go figure.

My guess is that Wilf will pick up a further 2 game ban I hope I am wrong.

 


One more point

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Charlie Croker Flag Hampshire 04 Feb 19 12.37pm Send a Private Message to Charlie Croker Add Charlie Croker as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle

I would hope that Wilf or the club would highlight the difference in the way the games were reffed.

But it's the FA, so fairness may not be part of the process, and they are just as likely to view any argument like that as a 'frivolous appeal' and ban him for 2 or more games.

 


“My experience of life is that it is not divided up into genres; it’s a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you’re lucky."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Nobbybm Flag Dartford 04 Feb 19 12.58pm Send a Private Message to Nobbybm Add Nobbybm as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle

I read somewhere he has until 18.00 hrs on 5th Feb to appeal - perhaps the Barnes incident will help Wilf (or possibly the FA will simply charge Barnes too).

Edited by Nobbybm (04 Feb 2019 12.59pm)

 


Will this be five? It's gonna be five! It IS five!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Petereagle Flag Brockley 04 Feb 19 1.31pm Send a Private Message to Petereagle Add Petereagle as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by Charlie Croker

I would hope that Wilf or the club would highlight the difference in the way the games were reffed.

But it's the FA, so fairness may not be part of the process, and they are just as likely to view any argument like that as a 'frivolous appeal' and ban him for 2 or more games.

But Barnes did at last stop ranting, but sad to say Wilf didn’t, he kept on applauding the ref and just wouldn’t stop, a proper case of the red mist descending.

But at least we did win without him, and Batshuayi will make a big difference to morale, and hopefully take the pressure off. And both Ayew and Benteke did well. So hopefully when he does come back there will be much less pressure on Wilf to always provide the magic

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Charlie Croker Flag Hampshire 04 Feb 19 1.56pm Send a Private Message to Charlie Croker Add Charlie Croker as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by Petereagle

But Barnes did at last stop ranting, but sad to say Wilf didn’t, he kept on applauding the ref and just wouldn’t stop, a proper case of the red mist descending.

He did stop - and Wilf clapped again. But if the MOTD footage is anything to go by, Barnes's language was pretty blue, and he was right in the face of the lino - so I would view it as bad as, if not worse, than Wilf's reaction.

Barnes was hard done by in this case so I understand the frustration and the outburst, but this is about consistency.

Wilf's annoyance at being kicked and fouled resulted in a reaction and a yellow, followed by a 2nd silly (but predictable) yellow. Barnes wrongful booking for simulation should have been followed immediately by a 2nd yellow for the outburst. Otherwise we're staying that a player can scream abuse into the face of an official and not get a sanction, but sarcasm will. And in these two instances, both were commenting on the quality of the officials, just in different ways.

If Barnes doesn't at least get a charge, then in future Wilf may as well shout and scream rather than clap.

 


“My experience of life is that it is not divided up into genres; it’s a horrifying, romantic, tragic, comical, science-fiction cowboy detective novel. You know, with a bit of pornography if you’re lucky."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Petereagle Flag Brockley 04 Feb 19 3.02pm Send a Private Message to Petereagle Add Petereagle as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by Charlie Croker

He did stop - and Wilf clapped again. But if the MOTD footage is anything to go by, Barnes's language was pretty blue, and he was right in the face of the lino - so I would view it as bad as, if not worse, than Wilf's reaction.

Barnes was hard done by in this case so I understand the frustration and the outburst, but this is about consistency.

Wilf's annoyance at being kicked and fouled resulted in a reaction and a yellow, followed by a 2nd silly (but predictable) yellow. Barnes wrongful booking for simulation should have been followed immediately by a 2nd yellow for the outburst. Otherwise we're staying that a player can scream abuse into the face of an official and not get a sanction, but sarcasm will. And in these two instances, both were commenting on the quality of the officials, just in different ways.

If Barnes doesn't at least get a charge, then in future Wilf may as well shout and scream rather than clap.

Very good point . Barnes and Wilf should get the same charge, Barnes got away with it

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
The Dolphin Flag 04 Feb 19 5.20pm Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle

Barnes definitely got away with it and can't be done as the ref booked him.
It just shows the inconsistencies as well as AM could barely get the red card out quick enough for Wilf.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ASCPFC Flag Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 04 Feb 19 5.38pm Send a Private Message to ASCPFC Add ASCPFC as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by The Dolphin

Barnes definitely got away with it and can't be done as the ref booked him.
It just shows the inconsistencies as well as AM could barely get the red card out quick enough for Wilf.

The ref also booked Wolf twice hence the red card. This had me wondering if then there are limited actions the FA can take as it was dealt with by the ref at the time. One equivalent I can think of off the top of my head is Wenger. He was sent to the stands continued to complain and got a touchline ban and fine. I can't remember if it was much of a ban or not.

 


Red and Blue Army!

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
VKR1888 Flag London 04 Feb 19 5.42pm Send a Private Message to VKR1888 Add VKR1888 as a friend

This post has been merged from a topic called 'The Wilfried Zaha Thread' by Midlands Eagle

This post has been merged from a topic called 'Wilf Ban' by Midlands Eagle

Originally posted by ASCPFC

The ref also booked Wolf twice hence the red card. This had me wondering if then there are limited actions the FA can take as it was dealt with by the ref at the time. One equivalent I can think of off the top of my head is Wenger. He was sent to the stands continued to complain and got a touchline ban and fine. I can't remember if it was much of a ban or not.

He never got carded for the additional clapping so they can give him whatever they want.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 131 of 495 < 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Palace Talk > The Wilfried Zaha Thread