This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Jeremy Corbyn
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
nickgusset  Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 10.54am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.50am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.46am
Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.37am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.24am
Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.19am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.18am
Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.13am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am
I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house.
Interesting. It would be a policy in the manifesto I would imagine, somewhat different. So no I am not saying that. That said, I agree with the idea. So you agree with a policy that would potentially deny pensioners their regular income and would strangle investment into the UK? Would it really strangle investment? Is there evidence for this or is this mere scaremongering? If you were an investor and a ideologically driven government was introducing laws that could prevent you receiving a return on your investment, what would be your incentive to invest in Britain? Let's leave this here Gusset. You have returned to type and are refusing to answer questions, or answering questions with questions. I am sure this will be a relief for you as you clearly don't want to answer awkward questions or don't have anything to answer them with. Twice I asked you about pensions, twice you twisted.
From where I see it, you seem to be ok with investment at the cost of employee rights and salary. Is this correct?
Fair enough. You cannot defend your stance that people should be payed less so that shareholders can make money. Have a lovely day. Little tip for Vietnam btw. There are not loads of KFC's out there, it's images of Ho Chi Minh.
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
 OldFella London 16 Jan 16 10.56am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.50am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.46am
Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.37am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.24am
Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.19am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.18am
Quote matt_himself at 16 Jan 2016 10.13am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.09am
I think that you'll find governments of all hues introduce policy and legislation without actually going through the house.
Interesting. It would be a policy in the manifesto I would imagine, somewhat different. So no I am not saying that. That said, I agree with the idea. So you agree with a policy that would potentially deny pensioners their regular income and would strangle investment into the UK? Would it really strangle investment? Is there evidence for this or is this mere scaremongering? If you were an investor and a ideologically driven government was introducing laws that could prevent you receiving a return on your investment, what would be your incentive to invest in Britain? Let's leave this here Gusset. You have returned to type and are refusing to answer questions, or answering questions with questions. I am sure this will be a relief for you as you clearly don't want to answer awkward questions or don't have anything to answer them with. Twice I asked you about pensions, twice you twisted.
From where I see it, you seem to be ok with investment at the cost of employee rights and salary. Is this correct?
This is all an argument in an empty room, anyway - there is virtually zero chance of Corbyn ever being elected, for reasons articulated well by Hoof earlier in this thread.
Jackson.. Wan Bissaka.... Sansom.. Nicholas.. Cannon.. Guehi.... Zaha... Thomas.. Byrne... Holton.. Rogers.. that should do it.. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| Hoof Hearted 16 Jan 16 11.07am | |
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.48am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 10.43am
Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments. Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset. But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately. From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income. Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population.
Yes invest in the country, but not to the detriment of pay for those that are actually doing the work that generates the profits.
We all know why there is low pay... immigration has created more workers prepared to do jobs for less and so the spiral of low pay began. As Matt quite rightly points out, all of our larger corporate pension schemes arrange their investments to include shares that pay regular dividends so that they can pay the pensions to their retired employees. Corbyn needs to wake up and realise what is causing the majority of the UK's problems is mass immigration and the effects of it like housing shortage, lower wages, hospital waiting times, schools overcrowded... the list goes on.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 11.10am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.07am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.48am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 10.43am
Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments. Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset. But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately. From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income. Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population.
Yes invest in the country, but not to the detriment of pay for those that are actually doing the work that generates the profits.
We all know why there is low pay... immigration has created more workers prepared to do jobs for less and so the spiral of low pay began. As Matt quite rightly points out, all of our larger corporate pension schemes arrange their investments to include shares that pay regular dividends so that they can pay the pensions to their retired employees. Corbyn needs to wake up and realise what is causing the majority of the UK's problems is mass immigration and the effects of it like housing shortage, lower wages, hospital waiting times, schools overcrowded... the list goes on. Immigration again? Are immigrants responsible for the fact that some CEO's and senior execs earn 187 times more than other workers?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 11.16am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.07am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.48am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 10.43am
Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments. Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset. But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately. From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income. Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population.
Yes invest in the country, but not to the detriment of pay for those that are actually doing the work that generates the profits.
We all know why there is low pay... immigration has created more workers prepared to do jobs for less and so the spiral of low pay began. As Matt quite rightly points out, all of our larger corporate pension schemes arrange their investments to include shares that pay regular dividends so that they can pay the pensions to their retired employees. Corbyn needs to wake up and realise what is causing the majority of the UK's problems is mass immigration and the effects of it like housing shortage, lower wages, hospital waiting times, schools overcrowded... the list goes on. 85% of the UK population do not own shares How many of the 15% that do have shares who rely on dividends for income is not cited.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hoof Hearted 16 Jan 16 11.28am | |
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 11.16am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.07am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.48am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 10.43am
Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments. Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset. But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately. From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income. Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population.
Yes invest in the country, but not to the detriment of pay for those that are actually doing the work that generates the profits.
We all know why there is low pay... immigration has created more workers prepared to do jobs for less and so the spiral of low pay began. As Matt quite rightly points out, all of our larger corporate pension schemes arrange their investments to include shares that pay regular dividends so that they can pay the pensions to their retired employees. Corbyn needs to wake up and realise what is causing the majority of the UK's problems is mass immigration and the effects of it like housing shortage, lower wages, hospital waiting times, schools overcrowded... the list goes on. 85% of the UK population do not own shares How many of the 15% that do have shares who rely on dividends for income is not cited.
You are making a silly point as usual. 15% of the population is a lot and as I have pointed out earlier the majority of those are elderly and more likely to vote in a general election. Those not holding shares directly will still be affected if they work in the private sector and are members of a pension scheme or have taken out a PPP because this will reduce their scope for investment growth. I'm going to join Matt and disengage with you on this matter as it is clearly beyond your scope of understanding. Edited by Hoof Hearted (16 Jan 2016 11.29am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 11.44am |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.28am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 11.16am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.07am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.48am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 10.43am
Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments. Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset. But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately. From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income. Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population.
Yes invest in the country, but not to the detriment of pay for those that are actually doing the work that generates the profits.
We all know why there is low pay... immigration has created more workers prepared to do jobs for less and so the spiral of low pay began. As Matt quite rightly points out, all of our larger corporate pension schemes arrange their investments to include shares that pay regular dividends so that they can pay the pensions to their retired employees. Corbyn needs to wake up and realise what is causing the majority of the UK's problems is mass immigration and the effects of it like housing shortage, lower wages, hospital waiting times, schools overcrowded... the list goes on. 85% of the UK population do not own shares How many of the 15% that do have shares who rely on dividends for income is not cited.
You are making a silly point as usual. 15% of the population is a lot and as I have pointed out earlier the majority of those are elderly and more likely to vote in a general election. Those not holding shares directly will still be affected if they work in the private sector and are members of a pension scheme or have taken out a PPP because this will reduce their scope for investment growth. I'm going to join Matt and disengage with you on this matter as it is clearly beyond your scope of understanding. Edited by Hoof Hearted (16 Jan 2016 11.29am) Be interesting to see how many of the 15% are very minor investors or were given shares as part of deals - e.g postal workers. As for the foreign investors. You're a bit UKIP hoof, if you don't mind me saying. Are you happy that much of our infrastructure is owned by foreign concerns? - meaning that dividends and profits actually is moved out of our economy.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hoof Hearted 16 Jan 16 11.55am | |
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 11.44am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.28am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 11.16am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.07am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.48am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 10.43am
Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments. Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset. But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately. From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income. Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population.
Yes invest in the country, but not to the detriment of pay for those that are actually doing the work that generates the profits.
We all know why there is low pay... immigration has created more workers prepared to do jobs for less and so the spiral of low pay began. As Matt quite rightly points out, all of our larger corporate pension schemes arrange their investments to include shares that pay regular dividends so that they can pay the pensions to their retired employees. Corbyn needs to wake up and realise what is causing the majority of the UK's problems is mass immigration and the effects of it like housing shortage, lower wages, hospital waiting times, schools overcrowded... the list goes on. 85% of the UK population do not own shares How many of the 15% that do have shares who rely on dividends for income is not cited.
You are making a silly point as usual. 15% of the population is a lot and as I have pointed out earlier the majority of those are elderly and more likely to vote in a general election. Those not holding shares directly will still be affected if they work in the private sector and are members of a pension scheme or have taken out a PPP because this will reduce their scope for investment growth. I'm going to join Matt and disengage with you on this matter as it is clearly beyond your scope of understanding. Edited by Hoof Hearted (16 Jan 2016 11.29am) Be interesting to see how many of the 15% are very minor investors or were given shares as part of deals - e.g postal workers. As for the foreign investors. You're a bit UKIP hoof, if you don't mind me saying. Are you happy that much of our infrastructure is owned by foreign concerns? - meaning that dividends and profits actually is moved out of our economy.
My share/investment portfolio over the last few years has included the BRIC countries and Japan but more recently I have limited this to India whilst the oil price shenanigans continue. I suspect pension funds have done the same. I'm very much in favour of us leaving the EU obviously as a UKIP supporter. Edited by Hoof Hearted (16 Jan 2016 11.56am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 12.02pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.55am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 11.44am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.28am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 11.16am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.07am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.48am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 10.43am
Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments. Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset. But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately. From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income. Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population.
Yes invest in the country, but not to the detriment of pay for those that are actually doing the work that generates the profits.
We all know why there is low pay... immigration has created more workers prepared to do jobs for less and so the spiral of low pay began. As Matt quite rightly points out, all of our larger corporate pension schemes arrange their investments to include shares that pay regular dividends so that they can pay the pensions to their retired employees. Corbyn needs to wake up and realise what is causing the majority of the UK's problems is mass immigration and the effects of it like housing shortage, lower wages, hospital waiting times, schools overcrowded... the list goes on. 85% of the UK population do not own shares How many of the 15% that do have shares who rely on dividends for income is not cited.
You are making a silly point as usual. 15% of the population is a lot and as I have pointed out earlier the majority of those are elderly and more likely to vote in a general election. Those not holding shares directly will still be affected if they work in the private sector and are members of a pension scheme or have taken out a PPP because this will reduce their scope for investment growth. I'm going to join Matt and disengage with you on this matter as it is clearly beyond your scope of understanding. Edited by Hoof Hearted (16 Jan 2016 11.29am) Be interesting to see how many of the 15% are very minor investors or were given shares as part of deals - e.g postal workers. As for the foreign investors. You're a bit UKIP hoof, if you don't mind me saying. Are you happy that much of our infrastructure is owned by foreign concerns? - meaning that dividends and profits actually is moved out of our economy.
My share/investment portfolio over the last few years has included the BRIC countries and Japan but more recently I have limited this to India whilst the oil price shenanigans continue. I suspect pension funds have done the same. I'm very much in favour of us leaving the EU obviously as a UKIP supporter. Edited by Hoof Hearted (16 Jan 2016 11.56am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hoof Hearted 16 Jan 16 12.08pm | |
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 12.02pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.55am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 11.44am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.28am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 11.16am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.07am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.48am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 10.43am
Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments. Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset. But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately. From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income. Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population.
Yes invest in the country, but not to the detriment of pay for those that are actually doing the work that generates the profits.
We all know why there is low pay... immigration has created more workers prepared to do jobs for less and so the spiral of low pay began. As Matt quite rightly points out, all of our larger corporate pension schemes arrange their investments to include shares that pay regular dividends so that they can pay the pensions to their retired employees. Corbyn needs to wake up and realise what is causing the majority of the UK's problems is mass immigration and the effects of it like housing shortage, lower wages, hospital waiting times, schools overcrowded... the list goes on. 85% of the UK population do not own shares How many of the 15% that do have shares who rely on dividends for income is not cited.
You are making a silly point as usual. 15% of the population is a lot and as I have pointed out earlier the majority of those are elderly and more likely to vote in a general election. Those not holding shares directly will still be affected if they work in the private sector and are members of a pension scheme or have taken out a PPP because this will reduce their scope for investment growth. I'm going to join Matt and disengage with you on this matter as it is clearly beyond your scope of understanding. Edited by Hoof Hearted (16 Jan 2016 11.29am) Be interesting to see how many of the 15% are very minor investors or were given shares as part of deals - e.g postal workers. As for the foreign investors. You're a bit UKIP hoof, if you don't mind me saying. Are you happy that much of our infrastructure is owned by foreign concerns? - meaning that dividends and profits actually is moved out of our economy.
My share/investment portfolio over the last few years has included the BRIC countries and Japan but more recently I have limited this to India whilst the oil price shenanigans continue. I suspect pension funds have done the same. I'm very much in favour of us leaving the EU obviously as a UKIP supporter. Edited by Hoof Hearted (16 Jan 2016 11.56am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| nickgusset Shizzlehurst 16 Jan 16 12.15pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 12.08pm
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 12.02pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.55am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 11.44am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.28am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 11.16am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.07am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.48am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 10.43am
Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments. Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset. But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately. From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income. Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population.
Yes invest in the country, but not to the detriment of pay for those that are actually doing the work that generates the profits.
We all know why there is low pay... immigration has created more workers prepared to do jobs for less and so the spiral of low pay began. As Matt quite rightly points out, all of our larger corporate pension schemes arrange their investments to include shares that pay regular dividends so that they can pay the pensions to their retired employees. Corbyn needs to wake up and realise what is causing the majority of the UK's problems is mass immigration and the effects of it like housing shortage, lower wages, hospital waiting times, schools overcrowded... the list goes on. 85% of the UK population do not own shares How many of the 15% that do have shares who rely on dividends for income is not cited.
You are making a silly point as usual. 15% of the population is a lot and as I have pointed out earlier the majority of those are elderly and more likely to vote in a general election. Those not holding shares directly will still be affected if they work in the private sector and are members of a pension scheme or have taken out a PPP because this will reduce their scope for investment growth. I'm going to join Matt and disengage with you on this matter as it is clearly beyond your scope of understanding. Edited by Hoof Hearted (16 Jan 2016 11.29am) Be interesting to see how many of the 15% are very minor investors or were given shares as part of deals - e.g postal workers. As for the foreign investors. You're a bit UKIP hoof, if you don't mind me saying. Are you happy that much of our infrastructure is owned by foreign concerns? - meaning that dividends and profits actually is moved out of our economy.
My share/investment portfolio over the last few years has included the BRIC countries and Japan but more recently I have limited this to India whilst the oil price shenanigans continue. I suspect pension funds have done the same. I'm very much in favour of us leaving the EU obviously as a UKIP supporter. Edited by Hoof Hearted (16 Jan 2016 11.56am)
Always back to immigration innit ! Back to the topic de jour: Do you disagree with Corbyn when he says he wants a fairer deal for workers and an end to the growing disparity between execs and the workforce? Back in the 70's it used to be that execs earned about 20% more than ordinary workers, now it's around 187 x more.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| chris123 hove actually 16 Jan 16 12.35pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 12.15pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 12.08pm
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 12.02pm
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.55am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 11.44am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.28am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 11.16am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 11.07am
Quote nickgusset at 16 Jan 2016 10.48am
Quote Hoof Hearted at 16 Jan 2016 10.43am
Matt is absolutely bang on the money about Corbyn's latest hair brained scheme to threaten dividend payments. Of course it appeals to those fortunate enough to have gold plated public sector pensions like teachers as it doesn't affect them.... I'm alright Jack mindset. But for the rest of us it would be a disaster both individually and corporately. From my own perspective I rely partly on dividends for my income. Yet another tick against Corbyn for a large slice of the population.
Yes invest in the country, but not to the detriment of pay for those that are actually doing the work that generates the profits.
We all know why there is low pay... immigration has created more workers prepared to do jobs for less and so the spiral of low pay began. As Matt quite rightly points out, all of our larger corporate pension schemes arrange their investments to include shares that pay regular dividends so that they can pay the pensions to their retired employees. Corbyn needs to wake up and realise what is causing the majority of the UK's problems is mass immigration and the effects of it like housing shortage, lower wages, hospital waiting times, schools overcrowded... the list goes on. 85% of the UK population do not own shares How many of the 15% that do have shares who rely on dividends for income is not cited.
You are making a silly point as usual. 15% of the population is a lot and as I have pointed out earlier the majority of those are elderly and more likely to vote in a general election. Those not holding shares directly will still be affected if they work in the private sector and are members of a pension scheme or have taken out a PPP because this will reduce their scope for investment growth. I'm going to join Matt and disengage with you on this matter as it is clearly beyond your scope of understanding. Edited by Hoof Hearted (16 Jan 2016 11.29am) Be interesting to see how many of the 15% are very minor investors or were given shares as part of deals - e.g postal workers. As for the foreign investors. You're a bit UKIP hoof, if you don't mind me saying. Are you happy that much of our infrastructure is owned by foreign concerns? - meaning that dividends and profits actually is moved out of our economy.
My share/investment portfolio over the last few years has included the BRIC countries and Japan but more recently I have limited this to India whilst the oil price shenanigans continue. I suspect pension funds have done the same. I'm very much in favour of us leaving the EU obviously as a UKIP supporter. Edited by Hoof Hearted (16 Jan 2016 11.56am)
Always back to immigration innit ! Back to the topic de jour: Do you disagree with Corbyn when he says he wants a fairer deal for workers and an end to the growing disparity between execs and the workforce? Back in the 70's it used to be that execs earned about 20% more than ordinary workers, now it's around 187 x more.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.