The details are obviously open to question, but surely the thing that is most questionably is why this case is still making headlines when dozens of people have been murdered on the streets since then and have not received anything like the same coverage.

It is clear that the media are only interested in White on Black murders, which are relatively rare, while Black on Black and Black on White crime is ignored. The latter are just a bit embarrassing for BLM and all the usual self serving crowd.

It amazes me that anyone still takes Lawrence's mother seriously when only a while ago she was accusing the Fire Brigade of being racist. She is just an embodiment of the lengths that politicians will go to look virtuous and woke.

And then we have Stephen Lawrence Day. Where to begin on that one?

Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (23 Sep 2021 8.07pm)

What happened to her son was tragic but it doesn't change that, in my view, she's awful.

Also yep, what's happened around the Kriss Donald murder pretty much tells you everything you need to know about the priorities and interests of the institutions and media.

I think he had a bench named after him.......wrong skin colour.

Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Sep 2021 8.15pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Completely different scenarios, you get people killed in fights all the time but they're never premeditated, you just don't get a group of 5 people deciding to go out and randomly kill someone and out of everyone they could have killed, one happened to be stephen lawrence who was known to deal drugs and his mate who was living in and out of hostels.

I doubt he was dealing drugs, he was getting home to another bus stop with his pal, they were just low lifes attacking 2 innocent black kids, they didn"t need a reason, just wanted to show each other how hard they were- or not as we know!Stephen went to a good school, was going to be an architect and probably would have made it, just because the word on the street in a Mill/charlton infested Eltham tries to dirty his name doesn"t mean anything-thats to be expected.

Promising footballer aswell ?

Your first port of call is to relate tensions that come from multiculturalism to tensions from religions. At first glance this is a good comparison though obviously not exact.

You appear to miss the very obvious response to the inevitability of racism being homogeneous societies. The only reason that Catholics and Protestants stopped killing each other in the UK was because the Protestants won and the Catholics were kept in their place all the way uptil atheism took over as the dominant position in Europe....I'd say sometime post 60s.

That's the only way societies can truly be harmonious, when one culture is the mainstream.....unfiltered multiculturalism has been an utter failure.

You seem to be suggesting that the solution to multiculturalism is indoctrination of groups against tribal self interest?.....Is this your idea of how they should relate to each other? Like I said to you, there has never been a time or place in history where this has worked. I asked you to counter that and you ignored it....I think that is telling.

I put it that indoctrination into a 'CRT' like system can only lead to increasing polarisation and balkanization.....indeed, if you look at demographical maps that's the practical outcome of increasing multiculturalism....different birds not flocking together as Ali meant all those years ago....everyone likes flowery words without actually looking at the results on the ground.

Relating group preference to crime or disease is just unworkable.....should we do that with class? Because that's far more common and actually has far more inpact on how well someone does? Is inequality a disease as well? It all sounds as realistic as communism was.

No, what is natural to the human being isn't a disease or a crime. I put it to you that those with these ideas are far more harmful to society that ten million Alf Garnetts ever could be.

All these ideas do is worsen social cohesion, turn people into liars and demonise people for natural behaviour. These ideas encourage the very stuff they explicitly say they oppose.....indeed, they have created an industry to look for any infringements to their ideology. Indeed, they don't even impose their ideas evenly creating 'protected groups' and ignoring tribal self interest from them and hunting for it only in Europeans.

No one was asked or given a choice.

People in Japan are happy living their lives without radicals calling them racists because your ideas don't have power there. They get to live without an industry and activists looking to destroy their lives for natural behaviours. Those polls showed how little they know about what would be waiting for them.

But in Europe the working classes have been forced to live out the fantasies of elites and globalists...and any that object are demonised.

Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Sep 2021 10.12pm)

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)