You are here: Home > Message Board > Football Talk > Blood on the Carpet at Sky Football studio
November 24 2024 6.11pm

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Blood on the Carpet at Sky Football studio

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 13 of 16 < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 >

  

PalazioVecchio Flag south pole 02 Sep 20 3.48pm Send a Private Message to PalazioVecchio Add PalazioVecchio as a friend

Originally posted by martin2412

perhaps they should look at the demographics of who actually attend football matches - white males are the majority of paying customers I would say.

Edited by martin2412 (02 Sep 2020 2.38pm)

Women watch fashion programmes and pay good money. But not all the fashion presenters are women

 


Kayla did Anfield & Old Trafford

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
martin2412 Flag Living The Dream 02 Sep 20 4.01pm Send a Private Message to martin2412 Add martin2412 as a friend

Originally posted by PalazioVecchio

Women watch fashion programmes and pay good money. But not all the fashion presenters are women

That's down to them. I don't want to watch mens football programmes with women at the helm or on the panel.

And Gok Wan is nearly a woman.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
IMpalace Flag London 02 Sep 20 4.14pm Send a Private Message to IMpalace Add IMpalace as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

Isn't it? I thought that SSN was for the general public, not current professional footballers.
It might well be true that there are bound to be more TV pundits who are Black in the future but their ability in front of the camera should be the deciding factor on whether they have a new career, not their skin colour.
We live in a world where we are constantly told that skin colour doesn't matter and yet then we are told that we must promote Black interests. Black Lives Matter, Black this Black that. When did you last hear something described relating to people starting with the word 'White' other than a racist insult?

Do you see the problem?

You can't have your cake and eat it. You can't employ this type of doublethink hypocrisy and not expect resistance.

I think it is the relevant stat. I was working on the assumption that we were aiming for equal representation of ex pro's, on the basis that I don't think white or black presenters are any by definition any better than each other at the job i.e. you would expect a split of pundits which is similar to the split of ex pro's.

Based on the above comment, I think you are saying we should be matching the skin colour of the presenters to those watching?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ambrose7 Flag Croydon 02 Sep 20 4.15pm Send a Private Message to ambrose7 Add ambrose7 as a friend

Originally posted by Willo

Well I am fairly sure they will not be replaced by 3 white men who have played at a high level and are steeped in knowledge of the game and with the ability to provide insight as well as entertainment.

Edited by Willo (02 Sep 2020 1.38pm)

Perhaps not, they may be replaced by 2 white men and 1 black man who have played at a high level and are steeped in knowledge of the game, perhaps more recent knowledge, and with the ability to provide insight as well as entertainment.

There are far more people than Charlie Nichols, Matt Le Tissier and Phil Thompson that fit that criteria. Believe it or not, there are also people who aren't white men that fit that criteria. Yes, black people can be good at football, insightful and entertaining! A black candidate who gets the job may be better than a white candidate that didn't!

It would be helpful if this thread clearly decoupled race and ability. It'd be extremely disappointing (read discriminatory) if Sky brought in three people of different races and the ones who weren't white start off with a greater level of scrutiny on them. Their ability is quite simply all that matters. At the moment your insinuation is that the presence of anything other than a white male means that person is there because of their appearance, that it couldn't possibly be because of their ability.

Edited by ambrose7 (02 Sep 2020 5.19pm)

 


26th January 2010 - Enter Administration
2nd May 2010 - D-Day 1 - Survival at Hillsborough
1st June 2010 - D-Day 2 - Survival at Lloyds
7th June 2010 - CPFC2010 exchange contracts.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
martin2412 Flag Living The Dream 02 Sep 20 4.29pm Send a Private Message to martin2412 Add martin2412 as a friend

Originally posted by ambrose7

Perhaps not, they may be replaced by 2 white men and 1 black man who have played at a high level and are steeped in knowledge of the game, perhaps more recent knowledge, and with the ability to provide insight as well as entertainment.

There are far more people than Charlie Nichols, Matt Le Tissier and Phil Thompson that fit that criteria. Believe it or not, there are also people who aren't white men that fit that criteria. Yes, black people can be good at football, insightful and entertaining! Potentially even more so than a white candidate!

It would be helpful if this thread clearly decoupled race and ability. It'd be extremely disappointing (read discriminatory) if Sky brought in three people of different races and the ones who weren't white start off with a greater level of scrutiny on them. Their ability is quite simply all that matters. At the moment your insinuation is that the presence of anything other than a white male means that person is there because of their appearance, that it couldn't possibly be because of their ability.

Edited by ambrose7 (02 Sep 2020 4.20pm)

Are you saying then that the three who were sacked didn't have ability ? I think they did but were too white.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jeeagles Flag 02 Sep 20 4.32pm

Originally posted by martin2412

If Sky intend to replace Le Tissier, Nicholas and Thompson with what they feel are more relevant people who watch football nowadays, perhaps they should look at the demographics of who actually attend football matches - white males are the majority of paying customers I would say.

Edited by martin2412 (02 Sep 2020 2.38pm)

It’s comments like that which deter people from different backgrounds going to football matches.

The colour of the crowd inside and outside Selhurst Park shows there is a problem with integration. The cause of the problems are complicated.

The fuss being made by some over the possibility of people from different backgrounds is incredible. It’s like reading a script for Borat in some cases.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
martin2412 Flag Living The Dream 02 Sep 20 4.45pm Send a Private Message to martin2412 Add martin2412 as a friend

Originally posted by jeeagles

It’s comments like that which deter people from different backgrounds going to football matches.

The colour of the crowd inside and outside Selhurst Park shows there is a problem with integration. The cause of the problems are complicated.

The fuss being made by some over the possibility of people from different backgrounds is incredible. It’s like reading a script for Borat in some cases.


Why should this comment deter different backgrounds from going to football ? It's a fact. No one said they're not welcome.

Sorry if you're another one one of those offended by facts when it suits.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
NEILLO Flag Shoreham-by-Sea 02 Sep 20 4.57pm Send a Private Message to NEILLO Add NEILLO as a friend

Originally posted by ambrose7

Perhaps not, they may be replaced by 2 white men and 1 black man who have played at a high level and are steeped in knowledge of the game, perhaps more recent knowledge, and with the ability to provide insight as well as entertainment.

There are far more people than Charlie Nichols, Matt Le Tissier and Phil Thompson that fit that criteria. Believe it or not, there are also people who aren't white men that fit that criteria. Yes, black people can be good at football, insightful and entertaining! Potentially even more so than a white candidate!

It would be helpful if this thread clearly decoupled race and ability. It'd be extremely disappointing (read discriminatory) if Sky brought in three people of different races and the ones who weren't white start off with a greater level of scrutiny on them. Their ability is quite simply all that matters. At the moment your insinuation is that the presence of anything other than a white male means that person is there because of their appearance, that it couldn't possibly be because of their ability.

Edited by ambrose7 (02 Sep 2020 4.20pm)

How do you work that out ?

Especially in light of your wanting to '' decouple '' race and ability from the debate !

 


Old, Ungifted and White

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ambrose7 Flag Croydon 02 Sep 20 5.17pm Send a Private Message to ambrose7 Add ambrose7 as a friend

Originally posted by NEILLO

How do you work that out ?

Especially in light of your wanting to '' decouple '' race and ability from the debate !

The statement is that a black candidate could be better than a white candidate.

For instance, if you had five candidates, their ability in rank order may be:

1) Black
2) White
3) White
4) Asian
5) Black

Apologies if it wasn't clear enough the first time around. I'm happy to edit it to make that point clearer.

 


26th January 2010 - Enter Administration
2nd May 2010 - D-Day 1 - Survival at Hillsborough
1st June 2010 - D-Day 2 - Survival at Lloyds
7th June 2010 - CPFC2010 exchange contracts.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
ambrose7 Flag Croydon 02 Sep 20 5.29pm Send a Private Message to ambrose7 Add ambrose7 as a friend

Originally posted by martin2412

Are you saying then that the three who were sacked didn't have ability ? I think they did but were too white.

No, I'm not. Everyone has ability to a degree. I think they're okay but personally, they're beginning to lack relevance given how long it is since they were last involved in the game. I can totally see why Sky would want a change - their insight and entertainment benefitted massively from losing Keys and Gray and getting Neville, Carragher and Jones, as one example.

While you're here, your early comment that 'Gok Wan is nearly a woman' is pretty poor. For one it's factually inaccurate - I assume you're making a reference to his homosexuality which is entirely different from being transsexual. Comments like that are part of the reason why there aren't any openly gay professional footballers.

 


26th January 2010 - Enter Administration
2nd May 2010 - D-Day 1 - Survival at Hillsborough
1st June 2010 - D-Day 2 - Survival at Lloyds
7th June 2010 - CPFC2010 exchange contracts.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
eagleman13 Flag On The Road To Hell & Alicante 02 Sep 20 5.30pm Send a Private Message to eagleman13 Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add eagleman13 as a friend

Originally posted by martin2412

That's down to them. I don't want to watch mens football programmes with women at the helm or on the panel.

And Gok Wan is nearly a woman.


Tom=The=Eagle would

 


This operation, will make the 'Charge Of The Light Brigade' seem like a simple military exercise.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
martin2412 Flag Living The Dream 02 Sep 20 6.08pm Send a Private Message to martin2412 Add martin2412 as a friend

Originally posted by ambrose7

No, I'm not. Everyone has ability to a degree. I think they're okay but personally, they're beginning to lack relevance given how long it is since they were last involved in the game. I can totally see why Sky would want a change - their insight and entertainment benefitted massively from losing Keys and Gray and getting Neville, Carragher and Jones, as one example.

While you're here, your early comment that 'Gok Wan is nearly a woman' is pretty poor. For one it's factually inaccurate - I assume you're making a reference to his homosexuality which is entirely different from being transsexual. Comments like that are part of the reason why there aren't any openly gay professional footballers.

The only reason we don't know which professional footballers are gay is because thankfully they don't act like Gok Wan. And who gives a toss whether they are anyway.

BTW, I'd like to announce that I'm openly heterosexual.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 13 of 16 < 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > Football Talk > Blood on the Carpet at Sky Football studio