This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Christine Blasey Ford
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
.TUX.  03 Oct 18 6.48pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Trump has his foot on the throat of the Deep State.
Buy Litecoin. |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
 Cucking Funt Clapham on the Back 03 Oct 18 6.50pm |
  |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by .TUX.
Trump has his foot on the throat of the Deep State. Officially my favourite HOL poster.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
 Stirlingsays 03 Oct 18 6.53pm |
 |
|---|---|
|
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| .TUX. 03 Oct 18 7.20pm |
|
|---|---|
|
I'm dead
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| .TUX. 03 Oct 18 7.22pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Phew, it could've been worse! Every cloud....
Buy Litecoin. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| The White Horse 04 Oct 18 3.01pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Ignoring the rape accusation and so on, just a quick look at the beer based facts: - The woman said she had one beer. I find this believable. -The lad said he had never blacked out due to drink and that he wasn't a big drinker. Having assessed the available evidence, I call bullsh*t on the latter, making him a liar. Case closed.
"The fox has his den. The bee has his hive. The stoat, has, uh... his stoat-hole... but only man chooses to make his nest in an investment opportunity.” Stewart Lee |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 04 Oct 18 3.19pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by The White Horse
Ignoring the rape accusation and so on, just a quick look at the beer based facts: - The woman said she had one beer. I find this believable. -The lad said he had never blacked out due to drink and that he wasn't a big drinker. Having assessed the available evidence, I call bullsh*t on the latter, making him a liar. Case closed. What rape accusation. Are you confusing this with the Ronaldo story?
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| The White Horse 04 Oct 18 3.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
What rape accusation. Are you confusing this with the Ronaldo story?
Are we really going to split hairs about whether he's accused of rape or a sexual assault? Incredible scenes.
"The fox has his den. The bee has his hive. The stoat, has, uh... his stoat-hole... but only man chooses to make his nest in an investment opportunity.” Stewart Lee |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 04 Oct 18 3.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by The White Horse
Are we really going to split hairs about whether he's accused of rape or a sexual assault? Incredible scenes. I reckon this bloke wouldn't say the two distinctly separate things being lumped together is splitting hairs.
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| The White Horse 04 Oct 18 4.14pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stuk
I reckon this bloke wouldn't say the two distinctly separate things being lumped together is splitting hairs. It would appear that man was guilty of neither, so the distinction is irrelevant to him. They're not massively distinct are they? I'm CBF's case, for example, the accuser claims penetration only didn't occur because he was too drunk to take off her clothes successfully before his mate jumped on the bed and knocked them all over. And didn't one of the other women who came forward claim she saw him in a queue for gang rape? As I said, I tend to agree that it's impossible to be sure based on thr testimony so far that he's a rapist/sexual assaulter. I just think the playing down his boozing is the only blatant lie I've witnessed in this case.
"The fox has his den. The bee has his hive. The stoat, has, uh... his stoat-hole... but only man chooses to make his nest in an investment opportunity.” Stewart Lee |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Badger11 Beckenham 04 Oct 18 4.24pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by The White Horse
Ignoring the rape accusation and so on, just a quick look at the beer based facts: - The woman said she had one beer. I find this believable. -The lad said he had never blacked out due to drink and that he wasn't a big drinker. Having assessed the available evidence, I call bullsh*t on the latter, making him a liar. Case closed. I am now 2 years into sobriety I have never blacked out due to alcohol I don't think any of my mates have either. I was still a heavy drinker and yes I was drunk. I agree that he says he wasn't a heavy drinker but then my mates would say the same thing men don't like to admit this. We are also talking about 40 years ago so he maybe playing it down in his mind. None of this means he is guilty even if he did black out and was a heavy drinker.
One more point |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stuk Top half 04 Oct 18 5.07pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by The White Horse
It would appear that man was guilty of neither, so the distinction is irrelevant to him. They're not massively distinct are they? I'm CBF's case, for example, the accuser claims penetration only didn't occur because he was too drunk to take off her clothes successfully before his mate jumped on the bed and knocked them all over. And didn't one of the other women who came forward claim she saw him in a queue for gang rape? As I said, I tend to agree that it's impossible to be sure based on thr testimony so far that he's a rapist/sexual assaulter. I just think the playing down his boozing is the only blatant lie I've witnessed in this case. I'm pretty sure he is more than irked at forever being known as someone accused of sexual assault, even after being cleared of it, but you assume he would find it irrelevant if people referred to him as an accused rapist instead. Why do they have to be "massively distinct" for you to use the correct term? As for the gang rape claim you seem to have now further upgraded it to "She says she was the victim of a gang rape in 1982 at a party attended by the judge." You said there were facts when both of the statements you picked are self made claims and there isn't any available evidence, for any of this. Which again goes back to the first comment I made on it: "What surprises me is that anyone is so willing to wholeheartedly believe either of them."
Optimistic as ever |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.