This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Rudi Hedman Caterham 23 Feb 16 10.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by crystal balls
Last year the population of London finally reached the level it was at in 1939. After many years of "mass immigration" we are back to where we were 80 years ago, So much for "overcrowding"! I don't know if you're being serious or joking. Maybe you don't know about slums and the slum clearance. Or families of 12 children and many families of many more than 1 child living on one storey of a house, sometimes in one room. Quite similar to how it can be now, with some people in social housing (some through bad fortune and some without much thought of preparing for the amount of babies they produce).
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 24 Feb 16 9.38am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
One has to define controlled. I would say that controlled means a stable population number much like it has been for decades before the recent mass immigration. Well that's not entirely true, as each decade since WWII has been marked by periods of mass migration (After the War, Indian Migration, pakistani Migration and Afro-Caribbean Migration - all really driven by a need for employees - and all met with similar arguments about society and equally less savoury ones). The primary difference between EU migration and the previous migrations has been the tendency towards the previous migrations being permanent, rather than temporary additions to the population. I agree that migration, and populations, need to be managed, but the question always remains how to regulate fairly, without resorting to a prejudicial basis, and that's where the EU migration has been problematic, the capacity to control and direct it has been driven more by market forces than the state. For other countries in Europe its a more common experience I think, given the size of borders and entry points, where as the UK as an Island, always has had a potent capacity to regulate, control and police its borders with its neighbours (something that for most mainland European countries is a much bigger undertaking).
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 24 Feb 16 9.42am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by elgrande
I think we have to be careful with the term British passport holders. Somehow I suspect that most people worried about immigration, aren't worried about people leaving the UK. Doesn't matter where you are from, once you are a UK citizen you are British, irrespective of what anyone, including the citizen might believe. Part of what is great about this country has been its multiple ethnic influences on our culture, society and arts.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
crystal balls The Garden of Earthly Delights 24 Feb 16 10.53am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
I don't know if you're being serious or joking. Maybe you don't know about slums and the slum clearance. Or families of 12 children and many families of many more than 1 child living on one storey of a house, sometimes in one room. Quite similar to how it can be now, with some people in social housing (some through bad fortune and some without much thought of preparing for the amount of babies they produce). Most major cities have a much greater population density than London; Paris roughly three times, many others even greater (and I'm not talking about Mexico City, Manilla or Sao Paulo, but places like Berlin, Barcelona, Amsterdam, Moscow, New York, Hong Kong, Milan etc. etc.) Most of those cities don't have any slums, they use space in a more planned considered way, and this is something London has belatedly started to do in recent years.
I used to be immortal |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 24 Feb 16 11.15am | |
---|---|
The thread title is just another word for "Multiculturalism the failed UK Experiment".
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 24 Feb 16 11.26am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by dannyh
The thread title is just another word for "Multiculturalism the failed UK Experiment".
What we have got are groups within groups that can't/won't/refuse/ to get along due to the nature of their beliefs, usually religious, or just being anti-social: Chelsea racist types. Disappear those two and the vast majority would be just fine.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 24 Feb 16 11.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by crystal balls
Most major cities have a much greater population density than London; Paris roughly three times, many others even greater (and I'm not talking about Mexico City, Manilla or Sao Paulo, but places like Berlin, Barcelona, Amsterdam, Moscow, New York, Hong Kong, Milan etc. etc.) Most of those cities don't have any slums, they use space in a more planned considered way, and this is something London has belatedly started to do in recent years.
I was talking about slums in London pre-WWII and your view that London was not overcrowded with population figures equal to then. So we all have to live in flats now because of other cities that were originally built high and with attractive architecture to the eye of the tourist? Have you seen the state and quality of life of some of those blocks of flats just outside of European cities? Incidentally, those Western European capitals are smaller when including the sprawl of cities. When is it a problem? When all of Sutton & Croydon and everything south into Banstead and Kenley is 1 and 2 bedroom flats? Is there no choice anymore apart from move further away where you've been to maintain a similar lifestyle?
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 24 Feb 16 11.41am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
What we have got are groups within groups that can't/won't/refuse/ to get along due to the nature of their beliefs, usually religious, or just being anti-social: Chelsea racist types. Disappear those two and the vast majority would be just fine. That may be true of London and certain other large citys, but go up North, even Luton, and there are whole towns that are no go areas if you are white, or not "from round here". It works in places like New york becuase essentially everyone in the states is an immigrant (unless you like wearing feathers and howling at the full moon), you are by the very definition no more than a 5/6th generation imigrant, American history goes back, what about 300 years, or in other words starts from when the pale face decided they liked the climate. I just don't think it's in the psyche of your average Briton to accept foriegn visitors as equals. We have spent thousands of years repelling invaders of one form or another from the Vikings to the Romans. And I think that comes out in peoples attitudes towards foreigners in the less cosmopolitan arears of the UK. And I can see why, your essentailly asking people to give ground and be accepting of others when for generations they've done exactly the opposite. My perosnal stance is that there should be more emphasis on intergration rather than immigration. Edited by dannyh (24 Feb 2016 11.43am)
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 24 Feb 16 11.42am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
What we have got are groups within groups that can't/won't/refuse/ to get along due to the nature of their beliefs, usually religious, or just being anti-social: Chelsea racist types. Disappear those two and the vast majority would be just fine. Have you shopped at the M&S end of Croydon or ever seen how many middle class people don't venture out of East Croydon station and just stay on the train or go over to platform 1 for the quickest route to London? Have you ever heard any literate people concerned about the level of UNCONTROLLED immigration? People are concerned about numbers and then, unfortunately fr the blinkered, there are people who just prefer being around their own kind, quite a natural wish, and a wish you have the right to. I think in time people do get used to people with the intention to stay and integrate, something it'll always be difficult with in the Muslim community and very different views on life and lifestyle. Where the current immigration differs is a lot of it is about coming to Britain, living for as cheap as possible, earning as much as possible in jobs that could be done by British youngsters if the government pulled their fingers out, and then returning back home with the money once they're done. It's not that they think of the money outflow when they see a rising community from outside, more that it's a growing area of migrants that means either they or other local people are moving away from. The rising figure year on year of those entering is above those who return back to their native country and will remain so, especially with more countries joining the EU. I don't blame them and I get along with everyone who's pleasant and doesn't hate us whilst setting up a new community we have no place being in but it is a problem you'd hear more of if you were here more often. Edited by Rudi Hedman (24 Feb 2016 11.46am)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 24 Feb 16 11.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
Have you shopped at the M&S end of Croydon or ever seen how many middle class people don't venture out of East Croydon station and just stay on the train or go over to platform 1 for the quickest route to London? Have you ever heard any literate people concerned about the lever of UNCONTROLLED immigration? People are concerned about numbers and then, unfortunately fr the blinkered, there are people who just prefer being around their own kind, quite a natural wish, and a wish you have the right to. I think in time people do get used to people with the intention to stay and integrate, something it'll always be difficult with in the Muslim community and very different views on life and lifestyle. Where the current immigration differs is a lot of it is about coming to Britain, living for as cheap as possible, earning as much as possible in jobs that could be done by British youngsters if the government pulled their fingers out, and then returning back home once they're done. The rising figure year on year of those entering is above those who return back to their native country and will remain so, especially with more countries joining the EU. I don't blame them and I get along with everyone who's pleasant and doesn't hate us whilst setting up a new community we have no place being in but it is a problem you'd hear more of if you were here more often. London is a big place. West Croydon is a tiny area within. There are plenty of other 'West Croydons' in the metropolis but you would actually have to seek them out to experience it because, as you know, the rest of London, the most of it, folk from different backgrounds just live, work and mingle. There would be a huge amount of flare-ups if that were not the case. Has London overall been a failure of multi-culturalism? As a pretty peaceful and prosperous world city it's hard to argue that it has, surely? It would be like saying New York has failed too. Edited by Kermit8 (24 Feb 2016 11.55am)
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
dannyh wherever I lay my hat....... 24 Feb 16 12.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
London is a big place. West Croydon is a tiny area within. There are plenty of other 'West Croydons' in the metropolis but you would actually have to seek them out to experience it because, as you know, the rest of London, the most of it, folk from different backgrounds just live, work and mingle. There would be a huge amount of flare-ups if that were not the case. Has London overall been a failure of multi-culturalism? As a pretty peaceful and prosperous world city it's hard to argue that it has, surely? It would be like saying New York has failed too. Edited by Kermit8 (24 Feb 2016 11.55am) No it would not. New york is based and was built on the blood sweat and tears of immigrants, and has always been a place of a multicultural background since it came into existance. The whole history of modern America is built from immigrants. The UK wasnt and isnt. Toatlly different social and demographical histories as well you know Kerm.
"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 24 Feb 16 12.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Kermit8
London is a big place. West Croydon is a tiny area within. There are plenty of other 'West Croydons' in the metropolis but you would actually have to seek them out to experience it because, as you know, the rest of London, the most of it, folk from different backgrounds just live, work and mingle. There would be a huge amount of flare-ups if that were not the case. Has London overall been a failure of multi-culturalism? As a pretty peaceful and prosperous world city it's hard to argue that it has, surely? That proves you haven't been around much lately. People will get along with others at work, but when out of work, it's generally be with your own. Yes, there aren't riots and gang warfare but gradually people move away or notice how something that was within reach before, is now harder to attain. Go further north of Croydon and you get to Pollards Hill if you turn a left before Streatham Common. Same applies there as with other West Croydon's/Selhurst's etc. None of this does or will make any difference to me or you I can see but I know it does to others.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.