This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 16 Jul 14 1.00pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Jul 2014 12.46pm
Definitely, and eventually it would have ended as industrialisation took over. However, the key point is that a flag is a symbol, and represents the presentation of a series of concepts associated with it society. The Confederate Battle Flag cannot be separated from what it represents historically: its a flag that's associated with the Confederacy, slavery, the anti-desegregation movements and of course the KKK. Its possible to reclaim symbols, such as the St Union flag from the NF etc but the Confederate Battle Flag has never really represented anything much beyond 'Southern US Politics' which has been stepped in racialism and racial prejudice since its inception. Its only other association is with 'Rebellion', but again its the rebellion in which the South claimed independency from the North, and one of the key issues in the right of independency was retention of slave labour and racialism - That's why the Klan adopted it because it represented their beliefs. Its a shame, because for Palace it could be a great symbolic flag, it being red and blue, with an association to the 'Rise of the South' / 'The South will Rise Again' only needing the word London added to give it a Selhurst poignancy. All the talk about honouring the confederate dead seems a bit bizarre, as they represented a US that never was (and radically departed from the current US that the same people tend to talk about patriotically). Its interesting that its reappearance in US culture was only really in the 1950s, when Georgia adopted the flag as its state flag whilst presenting a defence of segregation. I think a lot of people who claim the defence of honouring the dead great-great grandfather have essentially picking up on a discourse of 'defence of the indefensible' presented by certain factions in US Southern Politics that represent 'them good old days'. Kind of how politicians talk about 'supporting the troops' rather than discussing the war. Certainly before the 1950s, hardly anyone down south was using the Confederate Battle Flag.
I don't feel you're being all that fair to people in the south who honour the past southern dead. Sure they were on the wrong side but a lot of them were bought up within a system that meant that being anything other than what they were was unrealistic. Many in the south fought because they knew war was inevitable and they knew what was going to happen to their farms if they didn't repel the north. The confederate flag has already been reclaimed by many in the modern sense as a symbol of the south. I obviously don't support it being flown as a symbol of slavery or the KKK myself...And some people should recognise that many people don't object to the flag and want to fly it for other reasons. Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Jul 2014 1.18pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 16 Jul 14 1.04pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Jul 2014 12.51pm
Although in fairness I've never really understood why people feel the need to fly flags all the time in the first place to show 'pride'. Whilst some of those I've met turn out to be decent people, most of them have tended to be fairly lowly educated stupid people, who use phrases 'I'm not a racist but...'. Bloke over the road from my parents flies a Union Jack, as he calls it, I didn't have the heart to tell him that its only the Union Jack if flown from a Ship, or that its upside down.
A flag is just a symbol Jamie. Are you saying you have no symbols to represent anything about you?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
grump Milford On Sea 16 Jul 14 7.17pm | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Jul 2014 12.51pm
Although in fairness I've never really understood why people feel the need to fly flags all the time in the first place to show 'pride'. Whilst some of those I've met turn out to be decent people, most of them have tended to be fairly lowly educated stupid people, who use phrases 'I'm not a racist but...'. Bloke over the road from my parents flies a Union Jack, as he calls it, I didn't have the heart to tell him that its only the Union Jack if flown from a Ship, or that its upside down. It's a shame you have to ruin your articulate and reasoned argument with such distasteful comments. I think most people are aware that the British flag is in fact called the Union Flag. However it is still commonly known as the Union Jack whether flown from a ship or not, even by intelligent well educated people. If you don't understand why people fly flags as a symbol of pride, let me ask you this. Do you have children? If so, do you not have any symbols of your pride in them? Photographs, sports medals, school certificates etc? There are no restrictions on what people have pride in and if flying or displaying the "Union Jack" or the Confederate Southern Cross is a way of expressing pride in their homelands I'm not sure how that makes them lowly educated, stupid people.
Stay out the way of the Southern thing. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
bubble wrap Carparks in South East London 16 Jul 14 7.41pm | |
---|---|
Quote goodersgold at 15 Jul 2014 8.00pm
Quote c_block_shedevil at 15 Jul 2014 2.41pm
Quote nickgusset at 15 Jul 2014 10.36am
Quote bubble wrap at 15 Jul 2014 10.34am
Quote nickgusset at 15 Jul 2014 10.22am
Quote bubble wrap at 15 Jul 2014 8.33am
Quote nickgusset at 14 Jul 2014 9.36pm
Quote adrian b at 14 Jul 2014 7.04pm
Quote nickgusset at 14 Jul 2014 5.25pm
Gotta love the hol. Who would've thought we'd discuss flag semantics...
What about the flag with the skull and crossbones displayed at Selhurst, This could be deemed as promoting Pirates. You have more chance of bumping into a pirate than a slave these days. People are far to quick to worry themselves silly about other people being offended by something that in truth they probably don't give a rats arse about.
Has anyone actually complained about the flag, Anyone said they were deeply offended by the flag? No don't thinks so. Just trying to stick your beak in for the sake of it, Will get myself a huge BNP flag to give you something to really get your knickers in a twist about.
A case for both flags to be banned?
Spot on Gooders.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 16 Jul 14 7.50pm | |
---|---|
Quote grump at 16 Jul 2014 7.17pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Jul 2014 12.51pm
Although in fairness I've never really understood why people feel the need to fly flags all the time in the first place to show 'pride'. Whilst some of those I've met turn out to be decent people, most of them have tended to be fairly lowly educated stupid people, who use phrases 'I'm not a racist but...'. Bloke over the road from my parents flies a Union Jack, as he calls it, I didn't have the heart to tell him that its only the Union Jack if flown from a Ship, or that its upside down. It's a shame you have to ruin your articulate and reasoned argument with such distasteful comments. I think most people are aware that the British flag is in fact called the Union Flag. However it is still commonly known as the Union Jack whether flown from a ship or not, even by intelligent well educated people. If you don't understand why people fly flags as a symbol of pride, let me ask you this. Do you have children? If so, do you not have any symbols of your pride in them? Photographs, sports medals, school certificates etc? There are no restrictions on what people have pride in and if flying or displaying the "Union Jack" or the Confederate Southern Cross is a way of expressing pride in their homelands I'm not sure how that makes them lowly educated, stupid people. That's what I get for listening to ex-Navy Nope, no kids. But I see where you're coming from, but surely that's taking pride in your children's achievements and personal success as a parent: ie something you have done yourself. Generally lowly educated and stupid people in my experience, its not true of all of them. Their pride tends, in my experience, to be based in a rather false myopic view of a Britain that never was, and their own insecurities. Just my general experience mind, not a statement of truth about everyone. There's a big difference in displaying a flag around internationals and football matches, to flying one indefinitely. Personally, I think people should really be proud of things they've done and achieved, or influence, rather than generalised ideas about geography and history.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 16 Jul 14 7.54pm | |
---|---|
Quote bubble wrap at 16 Jul 2014 7.41pm
Quote goodersgold at 15 Jul 2014 8.00pm
Quote c_block_shedevil at 15 Jul 2014 2.41pm
Quote nickgusset at 15 Jul 2014 10.36am
Quote bubble wrap at 15 Jul 2014 10.34am
Quote nickgusset at 15 Jul 2014 10.22am
Quote bubble wrap at 15 Jul 2014 8.33am
Quote nickgusset at 14 Jul 2014 9.36pm
Quote adrian b at 14 Jul 2014 7.04pm
Quote nickgusset at 14 Jul 2014 5.25pm
Gotta love the hol. Who would've thought we'd discuss flag semantics...
What about the flag with the skull and crossbones displayed at Selhurst, This could be deemed as promoting Pirates. You have more chance of bumping into a pirate than a slave these days. People are far to quick to worry themselves silly about other people being offended by something that in truth they probably don't give a rats arse about.
Has anyone actually complained about the flag, Anyone said they were deeply offended by the flag? No don't thinks so. Just trying to stick your beak in for the sake of it, Will get myself a huge BNP flag to give you something to really get your knickers in a twist about.
A case for both flags to be banned?
Spot on Gooders. People shouldn't be embarrassed to fly it, only maybe embarrassed as to why they fly it. Overall, Britain is a pretty decent country, and England a fine and decent land. There's plenty to be proud of, some things to maybe be ashamed of, but probably more of the former than the later. Its the other stuff that slowly creeps into the reasoning that disturbs me. But then that flag isn't as controversial as the Confederate Battle Flag.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 16 Jul 14 7.55pm | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 16 Jul 2014 1.00pm
Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Jul 2014 12.46pm
Definitely, and eventually it would have ended as industrialisation took over. However, the key point is that a flag is a symbol, and represents the presentation of a series of concepts associated with it society. The Confederate Battle Flag cannot be separated from what it represents historically: its a flag that's associated with the Confederacy, slavery, the anti-desegregation movements and of course the KKK. Its possible to reclaim symbols, such as the St Union flag from the NF etc but the Confederate Battle Flag has never really represented anything much beyond 'Southern US Politics' which has been stepped in racialism and racial prejudice since its inception. Its only other association is with 'Rebellion', but again its the rebellion in which the South claimed independency from the North, and one of the key issues in the right of independency was retention of slave labour and racialism - That's why the Klan adopted it because it represented their beliefs. Its a shame, because for Palace it could be a great symbolic flag, it being red and blue, with an association to the 'Rise of the South' / 'The South will Rise Again' only needing the word London added to give it a Selhurst poignancy. All the talk about honouring the confederate dead seems a bit bizarre, as they represented a US that never was (and radically departed from the current US that the same people tend to talk about patriotically). Its interesting that its reappearance in US culture was only really in the 1950s, when Georgia adopted the flag as its state flag whilst presenting a defence of segregation. I think a lot of people who claim the defence of honouring the dead great-great grandfather have essentially picking up on a discourse of 'defence of the indefensible' presented by certain factions in US Southern Politics that represent 'them good old days'. Kind of how politicians talk about 'supporting the troops' rather than discussing the war. Certainly before the 1950s, hardly anyone down south was using the Confederate Battle Flag.
I don't feel you're being all that fair to people in the south who honour the past southern dead. Sure they were on the wrong side but a lot of them were bought up within a system that meant that being anything other than what they were was unrealistic. Many in the south fought because they knew war was inevitable and they knew what was going to happen to their farms if they didn't repel the north. The confederate flag has already been reclaimed by many in the modern sense as a symbol of the south. I obviously don't support it being flown as a symbol of slavery or the KKK myself...And some people should recognise that many people don't object to the flag and want to fly it for other reasons. Edited by Stirlingsays (16 Jul 2014 1.18pm) Nothing wrong with honouring your war dead etc, although its worth noting that this was done without flying confederate flags for about 70 years.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
adrian b Landrindod, Wales 16 Jul 14 9.08pm | |
---|---|
As we should show respect for those die while fighting under a flag, are we to assume those who flew the Confederate Flag at Palace are showing this respect? Who are these Americans? Also can we fly a swaztica at Selhurst in respect for those who died for such a worthy cause?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 17 Jul 14 12.00am | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Jul 2014 7.55pm
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 17 Jul 14 12.03am | |
---|---|
Quote adrian b at 16 Jul 2014 9.08pm
As we should show respect for those die while fighting under a flag, are we to assume those who flew the Confederate Flag at Palace are showing this respect? Who are these Americans? Also can we fly a swaztica at Selhurst in respect for those who died for such a worthy cause?
It makes sense in that context but really......The flag could be altered a bit to reflect that. I can't think of a connection between us and the Nazis. Edited by Stirlingsays (17 Jul 2014 12.31am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 17 Jul 14 12.04am | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 17 Jul 2014 12.00am
Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Jul 2014 7.55pm
True, but its popularity soared in the 1950s. You can only know what you know, prior to that resurgence, as far as I can tell its primary use was by the KKK and affiliated bodies. Of course its history in terms of UK use is only really in relation to that. Arguably its much less of a controversial issue in the UK than the US.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 17 Jul 14 12.30am | |
---|---|
Quote jamiemartin721 at 16 Jul 2014 7.50pm
Personally, I think people should really be proud of things they've done and achieved, or influence, rather than generalised ideas about geography and history.
What would bring people together under a common banner to fight wars and pool resources? Your reflections upon stupid people being more attracted to symbols of nationalism is a redundant argument. Statistically there are 'less' intelligent people than average or below average. Really it isn't really about intelligence but about identity and individualism. The old line being that more 'intelligent' the person is, the more individualistic and vice versa the 'less intelligent' person prefers to self identify with a larger group.....A kind of safety in numbers. It's all a kind of half truth nonsense of course and in reality flags are symbols and plenty of people of all intellects identify with them....It's an honest but slightly insulting impression. As for people's impressions of national history.....Bah. If people want to stand under a union flag and believe it stands for this or that other it is no less accurate than anything else that can be said. Who gets to decide which history concerning the flag is valid or not? Everything is built upon perception and any view can be analyzed and deconstructed. There is no single truth about any history. It represents what they want it to represent.....That whole line of argument is a moot one.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.