This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Midlands Eagle 23 Jan 14 11.21am | |
---|---|
Quote beagle at 23 Jan 2014 11.01am
Someone's got to be the mouthpiece, the conduit of information at Palace. I don't want to see Pullis or Moody wasting their time either constantly updating the media or spending time online answering questions. Let the people doing the actual work get on and do it, while members of the board keep up the updates. Well I would rather hear updates where necessary from Tony Pulis but only if he actually had something to say. How do you think Arsenal supporters would feel if they were given regular updates that didn't actually say anything from Sir Chips Keswick. There would be an outcry as the only views that Arsenal supporters are interested in are those of Arsene Wenger
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
bexleydave Barnehurst 23 Jan 14 11.30am | |
---|---|
Quote Ian J at 23 Jan 2014 11.21am
Quote beagle at 23 Jan 2014 11.01am
Someone's got to be the mouthpiece, the conduit of information at Palace. I don't want to see Pullis or Moody wasting their time either constantly updating the media or spending time online answering questions. Let the people doing the actual work get on and do it, while members of the board keep up the updates. Well I would rather hear updates where necessary from Tony Pulis but only if he actually had something to say. How do you think Arsenal supporters would feel if they were given regular updates that didn't actually say anything from Sir Chips Keswick. There would be an outcry as the only views that Arsenal supporters are interested in are those of Arsene Wenger
Bexley Dave Can you hear the Brighton sing? I can't hear a ******* thing! "The most arrogant, obnoxious bunch of deluded little sun tanned, loafer wearing mummy's boys I've ever had the misfortune of having to listen to" (Burnley forum) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sydtheeagle England 23 Jan 14 11.43am | |
---|---|
I cannot believe how massively impressed with Tony Pulis I am. Bexley has just pointed out yet another reason why we're so lucky to have him. TBH if I had a senior manager like that in my company who was the expert in the area in which I did business, I'd keep my mouth zipped and wheel him out to be my spokesperson on every possible occasion. He is intelligent, informed, knowledgeable, media-genic, and articulate. In front of the cameras talking about any aspect of football, Parish simply pales in comparison.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cornwalls palace Torpoint 23 Jan 14 11.50am | |
---|---|
Quote sydtheeagle at 23 Jan 2014 10.53am
Two points: 1. I'm not remotely interested whether Browett (or any of the board) think Jelavic is no better than Jerome. But if Pulis feels he isn't then that's good enough for me. So as long as TP and not he board made the decision, I'm fine with it. But I wish Browett had said "Tony thinks..." rather than the way the OP here phrased it ("the board think...). 2. I don't know if you guys are medically aware at all, but Murray's injury was a major one. It's generally considered sensible to give it a year before returning; it's quite possible to do it in 9 months but that doesn't make it advisable. Anyway, my point is that anything we get out of Murray this season should be considered an unexpected bonus. We really should not be relying on him returning in any way.
.......has our coach driver done a Poo'yet, without thinking about Gus! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cornwalls palace Torpoint 23 Jan 14 11.58am | |
---|---|
Quote Willo at 23 Jan 2014 10.26am
Quote Rudi Hedman at 23 Jan 2014 10.19am
I agree that Shane Long & Jelavic are better than Jerome, What's the odds that either Jelavic or Long score against us ?
.......has our coach driver done a Poo'yet, without thinking about Gus! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cornwalls palace Torpoint 23 Jan 14 12.01pm | |
---|---|
Quote sydtheeagle at 23 Jan 2014 11.43am
I cannot believe how massively impressed with Tony Pulis I am. Bexley has just pointed out yet another reason why we're so lucky to have him. TBH if I had a senior manager like that in my company who was the expert in the area in which I did business, I'd keep my mouth zipped and wheel him out to be my spokesperson on every possible occasion. He is intelligent, informed, knowledgeable, media-genic, and articulate. In front of the cameras talking about any aspect of football, Parish simply pales in comparison.
.......has our coach driver done a Poo'yet, without thinking about Gus! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
npn Crowborough 23 Jan 14 12.15pm | |
---|---|
Tricky one - if the board say nothing, we'd all be moaning about being kept in the dark. If they make announcements, they're media whores. I don't for a moment suspect that "Jelovic is no better than what we have" is/was a decision taken by the board - it simply must have been with the approval of TP or IM and probably both. If that were not the case, I'd suspect TP would have been throwing his toys out of the pram (and rightly so). I feel our current board are victims of their desire to keep us plebs informed (as fans themselves). We all congratulated them for that approach in the early days, now it seems there's a bit of a backlash and a percepotion that they court the limelight. I'm personally not that bothered either way, as long as the players TP/IM want come in and the progress continues. Going down would see us financially secure, but I wouldn't see us coming back up for the foreseeable future (unless we get lucky again).
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Plane Bromley 23 Jan 14 12.22pm | |
---|---|
Quote bexleydave at 23 Jan 2014 11.30am
Quote Ian J at 23 Jan 2014 11.21am
Quote beagle at 23 Jan 2014 11.01am
Someone's got to be the mouthpiece, the conduit of information at Palace. I don't want to see Pullis or Moody wasting their time either constantly updating the media or spending time online answering questions. Let the people doing the actual work get on and do it, while members of the board keep up the updates. Well I would rather hear updates where necessary from Tony Pulis but only if he actually had something to say. How do you think Arsenal supporters would feel if they were given regular updates that didn't actually say anything from Sir Chips Keswick. There would be an outcry as the only views that Arsenal supporters are interested in are those of Arsene Wenger
In fairness to SB these quotes that everyone has debated for 13 pages on here come from the BBS in answer to direct questions.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Lyons550 Shirley 23 Jan 14 12.25pm | |
---|---|
Quote sydtheeagle at 23 Jan 2014 10.53am
Two points: 1. I'm not remotely interested whether Browett (or any of the board) think Jelavic is no better than Jerome. But if Pulis feels he isn't then that's good enough for me. So as long as TP and not he board made the decision, I'm fine with it. But I wish Browett had said "Tony thinks..." rather than the way the OP here phrased it ("the board think...). Completely understand where you're coming from on this however...is it 'really' such an issue that its not mentioned or phrased in the way you or I would like? Surely the most important thing is that the club is built and moves forward on stable foundations getting the right player/manager/DoF that fits with the clubs aspirations at this moment in time, as opposed to semantics?
The Voice of Reason In An Otherwise Mediocre World |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Willo South coast - west of Brighton. 23 Jan 14 12.27pm | |
---|---|
Quote npn at 23 Jan 2014 12.15pm
Tricky one - if the board say nothing, we'd all be moaning about being kept in the dark. If they make announcements, they're media whores. . I agree.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
turbohorsebox Coulsdon 23 Jan 14 12.44pm | |
---|---|
Quote Lyons550 at 23 Jan 2014 12.25pm
Quote sydtheeagle at 23 Jan 2014 10.53am
Two points: 1. I'm not remotely interested whether Browett (or any of the board) think Jelavic is no better than Jerome. But if Pulis feels he isn't then that's good enough for me. So as long as TP and not he board made the decision, I'm fine with it. But I wish Browett had said "Tony thinks..." rather than the way the OP here phrased it ("the board think...). Completely understand where you're coming from on this however...is it 'really' such an issue that its not mentioned or phrased in the way you or I would like? Surely the most important thing is that the club is built and moves forward on stable foundations getting the right player/manager/DoF that fits with the clubs aspirations at this moment in time, as opposed to semantics? .........is the correct answer!
All good. Nothing bad. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sydtheeagle England 23 Jan 14 12.49pm | |
---|---|
Quote Willo at 23 Jan 2014 12.27pm
Quote npn at 23 Jan 2014 12.15pm
Tricky one - if the board say nothing, we'd all be moaning about being kept in the dark. If they make announcements, they're media whores. . I agree. I think ultimately this is true (that they are damned if they do and damned if they don't), but it's somewhat ironic. Here's why. In a number of posts recently, those who disagree with the board over our transfer policy have been criticised (often unfairly) as being a reflection of a modern age where we want everything immediately and are not prepared to wait for things to happen. It's true; in so far as a lack of patience is certainly a hallmark of the world we now live in. But it's not without irony that the same people who are lauding the board for their presumed patience and financial restraint are the same people who also applaud their engagement with supporters, which in reality is only likely to encourage false expectations, increase frustration, and encourage second-guessing. This is not to criticise supporters or the board in any personal way. It is simply to raise the subject for discussion. My only conclusion is that for a long time (in history), the board of a football club would not have felt the need to directly update supporters on future policy (indeed, even as recently as a decade ago this was true) and I don't think it is at all clear that having a board who communicate with us through an Internet fan site and seem determined to talk in fairly granular detail on confidential subjects is a good thing. Again, that is not to openly criticise CPFC2010...it it merely to say that I do not think it is absolutely clear that their communications strategy is sensible or desirable. And as Parish is a "media expert", I think it's quite appropriate to question him about this. I don't (personally) think it follows at all that "all noise is good noise" when it come to speaking out or that the board discussing future transfer possibilities with fans is a desirable state of affairs. I think we need to move beyond the notion that the board are good because of the way they communicate with supporters. There isn't any evidence that at least some areas of their conversation are helping anyone and it's far from certain that discussion before the fact is preferable to a lucid and full explanation after the fact. Either way, I think this is a central point that merits discussion. I also think some fans are very lightweight and not intellectually very rigorous in their analysis; they are so flattered and impressed that the board is even speaking to them that their palpable delight blinds them to asking questions that still need to be asked.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.