You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)
November 25 2024 10.46am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

BBC (again)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 128 of 435 < 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 >

  

The Dolphin Flag 24 Jan 22 12.33pm Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

Question of Sport is a good example of how to ruin a programme.
I suspect it had a decent audience - niche probably - who loved the banter and enjoyed Sue Barker being in charge.
Then the BBC make it a Show that I gather is not very much about sport and often with lots of people who are nothing to do with sport - hmmm - let me think!
I honestly don't know what the current viewing figures are but I doubt that they match the old ones.
The BBC don't really like a load of successful Sportsmen and Women being on show - it doesn't suit their ridiculous agendas.
More of my fee being used on stuff I will never watch.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 24 Jan 22 12.44pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

ITV certainly is, as it depends on commercial interests. Channel 4 less so as it is publicly owned but also derives its revenue from commercial interests, so potentially less than the BBC.

Not according to Ofcom. Their report says 54% agree BBC news is impartial which is lower than the figure for ITV, Channel 4 and Sky News.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 24 Jan 22 12.46pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Strange, isn't it? I don't watch Dr Who and never have. The little bits I have stumbled over I find ridiculous.

This for me is not something the BBC ought to be doing at all. It's not it's mandate. So far as I can tell it's just expensive escapism which could be left to those chasing ratings and revenue.

Chasing ratings? Why else is Eastenders shown on Christmas Day?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 24 Jan 22 2.42pm Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

Originally posted by The Dolphin

Question of Sport is a good example of how to ruin a programme.
I suspect it had a decent audience - niche probably - who loved the banter and enjoyed Sue Barker being in charge.
Then the BBC make it a Show that I gather is not very much about sport and often with lots of people who are nothing to do with sport - hmmm - let me think!
I honestly don't know what the current viewing figures are but I doubt that they match the old ones.
The BBC don't really like a load of successful Sportsmen and Women being on show - it doesn't suit their ridiculous agendas.
More of my fee being used on stuff I will never watch.

....so Willy Carson & Bill Beaumont are no longer on it?

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
The Dolphin Flag 24 Jan 22 2.59pm Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

Ha Ha - nor Emlyn Hughes, Ian Botham and the like

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 24 Jan 22 9.04pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Badger11

Yeah it's so good you have to force people to pay for it with the threat of a criminal record if they don't.

Admired by who? The luvvies in other countries certainly as the BBC is a money pit for them of course they would like their own version.

The World service seems to be admired but that is paid for by the government not he licence fee.


Edited by Badger11 (24 Jan 2022 10.25am)

Whether the BBC output is good, or bad, is a personal opinion. The responsibility to hold a licence to view ANY live TV is placed on all of us, irrespective of that opinion. It's our contribution to the funding of our national broadcaster in a way which ensures it remains independent of government.

The BBC is admired by many, and not just by avaricious "luvvies"! It's the independence of government and truthfulness which builds the trust that so many have for the BBC.

The world service is indeed admired, but it's a mistake to suppose it's a separate, standalone service. There is these days only one newsroom. Journalists work for both the domestic service, and the world service. Only about 25% of its cost is funded by the government. The other 75% by the licence fee. They keep that quiet though, as it wouldn't be popular!

Take a look at this.I found it interesting:-

[Link]

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 24 Jan 22 9.15pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Chasing ratings? Why else is Eastenders shown on Christmas Day?

I have no idea. It's not what I think they should be doing. That's for the commercial broadcasters.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 24 Jan 22 9.38pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by The Dolphin

Wisbech - we all want the BBC to be that shining light - but sadly you cannot polish a turd!
It is no longer fit for purpose but get them to turn that ship around and I would be very happy to keep on paying my license fee.
As for the NHS - the idea is great but the reality is a typical bloated Government run department which is in the most terrible state and only massive changes with some private help can save it.
You only have to spend some time in or visiting hospitals now to know that it is broken and so are the Doctors and Nurses - all betrayed by successive Governments who continually boast about the money they are throwing at it knowing that most of it is just going to be wasted.
Bed reduction is the worst of the lot and weirdly - whilst Mr Blair boasted about what he was doing for the NHS he cut more beds than anyone during his and Gordon Brown's tenure.
Don't get me wrong - they are all bad but they were the worst.

As my wife works on the front line in our local hospital I get first-hand reports. The NHS isn't broken at all. It's under considerable stress at the moment, and under some stress all the time. Much of that is not its fault. It's much more to do with the lack of social care provision, and that's the result of decades of under-investment. This results in many hospital beds being occupied by people fit for discharge but without a safe place to discharge them to.

Reducing the number of beds has much more to do with improvements in treatments and the consequential massive reduction in the average recovery time before discharge than any desire to just cut the numbers.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Jimenez Flag SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 24 Jan 22 9.50pm Send a Private Message to Jimenez Add Jimenez as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

Chasing ratings? Why else is Eastenders shown on Christmas Day?

How's Ali & Pete Beale doing?

 


Pro USA & Israel

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 24 Jan 22 9.52pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger

A bit like moving to Cornwall.

Escapism is a large part of Television. In fact, it is one of the things that improves the quality of people's lives, especially when most people have dull, uninspiring ones.

We all pay for programs on all channels through advertising, so the BBC doing escapism is no different. The BBC needs to exercise its imagination on something different because it's normally focussed on avoiding the truth.

I didn't "escape" to Cornwall. I had long planned to retire here, having enjoyed many happy visits here. I had lived all over the UK, and in the Philippines, but Cornwall was always going to be my preferred final home.

There is no advertising on the BBC in the UK. Which is the vital difference between itself and other broadcasters. Being free of both direct government influence and the need to protect advertising revenue by going easy on those who spend money means they can always tell the objective truth, as they perceive it.

Which they are bound by their Charter to do.

So the idea that they are "focussed on avoiding the truth" could not be more wrong. Precisely the reverse is true.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 25 Jan 22 4.30am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

How someone can highlight that the NHS is under 'considerable stress' and then also advocate for sacking tens of thousands of staff is just mind blowing.

One doesn't match the other.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
The Dolphin Flag 25 Jan 22 5.52am Send a Private Message to The Dolphin Add The Dolphin as a friend

Wisbech - the NHS is not suffering from underfunding and hasn't done for years - it is how those funds are used that is the issue.
If it were run on a more more business like footing then the care would improve and the wastage would start to disappear.
I also know a few on the frontline and they believe that while it is a great "institution" it is also a busted flush that needs help urgently

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 128 of 435 < 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > BBC (again)