You commented without watching the link didn't you.

Anyway using that logic you'd have every country in the world with nuclear weapons.

Besides, this isn't my point. These labs are US funded, why are they there and why did they lie about them.

Edited by Stirlingsays (11 Mar 2022 8.33am)

The Pentagon know about it, that's been revealed.

Nothing would surprise me about Biden, he's a walking meme, he's probably on drugs just to cognitively get through the day.

It's not in dispute that Russia are the invader and that we back the right of the Ukraine to defend itself. That said, I'm rather desperate for peace, seemingly more than the media or US government. We can clearly see the potential for serious escalation and I'm seeing the sudden commentary on chemical weapons very concerning. I know Russia has them, however I didn't know that the Ukraine had US funded biolabs concerning god knows what.

I don't trust any of them.

Edited by Stirlingsays (11 Mar 2022 10.13am)

"Russian Forces that have been Slowly Advancing on Kyiv from the Eastern Ukrainian city of Sumy have reportedly begun to withdraw back towards the Western Russian Border over the last 24 hours according to US Intel Officials, there is No Indication for why this is occurring."

It seems that worries are growing that Putin may use chemical weapons, perhaps on a pretext or via a false flag. This has been said by several today and, judged by its tone, is based on more than just speculation. The USA seems to have either a source inside the Russian military or, more likely, are able to intercept communications. So I think they have good reason to be worried.

The argument being that the war is not going as they expected, but they cannot accept compromises, so will move to the next level. This is expected to be chlorine bombing, similar to that they used in Syria. If correct this would escalate the conflict very considerably as the loss of civilian life would be in the thousands.

I already heard one MP say this must be a red line which if crossed must result in us responding militarily. I don't think Nato will respond but wonder if some Nato members might, either on their own, or in concert, but independent of Nato command. That would present many problems because Putin won't want to make the distinction. Things could be about to become much worse than they already are.

I also sense a growing division between what Ukraine expects of us, what we can deliver and what we expect of them. I think we secretly hope they accept defeat soon, avoid needless loss of life, and then resist in a guerilla war, whilst we allow the sanctions to do their work. They want us to give them air cover, so they can continue their military defence, are getting frustrated at our refusal, and putting pressure on to get that reversed. In my opinion we really mustn't do that.

He hasn't been in office long enough to be the cause of this.

Tucker Carlson seems to be the only mainstream journalist actually questioning official narratives. Here he is asking questions about the biolabs uncovered in Ukraine.....At first called a conspiracy theory and now admitted to be 'securing bio-chemical weapons'....stated to be Russian weapons from 2005....That's 17 years ago, why are they still there.

[Link]

Edited by Stirlingsays (11 Mar 2022 7.47am)