He just ignores the fact that the 'everybody came from Africa' is a theory and hotly debated. It's far more likely that humans evolved in several places and that the eventual mix that succeeded has been found there up to a certain age...There's no evidence that it started in Africa, it's a theory.

But hey, these people find it hard to 'evolve' their thinking.

It's a strawman argument anyway, humans are all related to each other and that's never been contested.

That whole contention completely misses the point.

Perhaps when they start arguing for diversity in Israel I'll at least not regard them as a hypocrite.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

What existing occupants? The ones who had previously migrated there from Africa? Despite the claims from other posters who seem to want to rewrite history because it doesn’t fit their agenda it’s well understood that Homo Sapiens evolved in Africa and spread from there. That they also then mixed their DNA with other humans who had got out of Africa earlier is also known.

[Link]

Face reality. You are whistling in the dark. We won’t fade away. Our appearances may, over many generations, be changed. Climate change being responsible for some too, just as changed conditions did for those ancestors you want to deny. Our culture will develop and be enriched, but our values will remain just so long as we maintain them.

You whinging about this does nothing to sustain our values. It diminishes them.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Home Secretary Suella Braverman says multiculturalism has "failed" during a speech on migration. She says it has "allowed people to come to our society and live parallel lives in it" ... "You can see it play out... from Malmo, to Paris, Brussels, to Leicester."

Many of us have known this for many years, but it is helpful that a cabinet minister now admits it.

Nothing in the links provides challenge to the fundamental proposition that the origin of our species was in Africa. That some Europeans may have taken the long route around Asia to get here is somewhat besides the point. Nor is that they mixed with other humans on arrival. Our species first evolved in Africa.

None of this is that important. However we got here, we did. We aren’t a separate race, let alone a superior one. We share the planet and it’s problems, so have mutual interests in solving them.

Building walls and closing doors has the potential to create more problems than it solves.

Unless and until we know there are valid reasons why people will decide not to risk their lives to migrate they will continue to try. Some will succeed. Others will die.

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

So why do people risk their lives crossing the channel in small overcrowded dinghies when they already have safety in mainland Europe?

hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing.

One of your dafter than average posts - and of course with you the bar is so high.