This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Mattconrov 05 Aug 23 10.19pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Pretty much agree on that, though I'm a bit of a square like that as I was never into all that....more the gym. I just got hammered occasionally on the booze when I was younger but that was always more social than being into it. Yeah, it's funny when you hear about what the CIA and other security agencies are alleged to get up to......Literally being funded by their taxpayers to be the actual criminals. Quite crazy. Nothing really seems to have changed either.
" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 05 Aug 23 10.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mattconrov
Cheers mate, cheque's in the post.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 05 Aug 23 10.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mattconrov
Although I feel bringing my children into the conversation not too chilvalrous from you. I don't speak to my children about politics. I just give them lots of love - and money. I don’t regard this as political. I can respect those who honestly believe in different political approaches to my own. I see this as much more basic than that. I see this as the difference between truth and lies. A battle between honesty and deception. I totally reject the idea that there is a global elite intent on controlling everything for their own benefit. I have more faith in the fundamental goodness of humanity than that. Flawed we may be. That evil exists among us is obvious but not in large numbers. There is simply no way that a global elite could organise itself to do what it is accused of doing, or be united in a self serving endeavour. It’s not real. I only see conspiracy theories being created by those who wish us harm in places where freedom of expression is restricted and spread into the minds of the easily impressionable via the modern media without any effective controls, then amplified by those who see an opportunity for profit. It’s no wonder to me that a surge of mistrust in science, business, government and institutions has occurred during the internet age. A time I regard as post truth. That others see it as healthy, and the time when previously accepted norms are being challenged, fails on every level, simply because almost always there is no real evidence, no peer review, no fact checking. When even fact-checkers are dismissed as bias you know something is seriously wrong. So it’s not having discussions directly with your children that concerns. It’s creating an environment in which lies are believed more than truths. It’s encouraging distrust. An open mind and a degree of scepticism is healthy, but only when the resolution is to seek genuine information from those qualified to give it. Not from self serving grifters on the internet.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 05 Aug 23 10.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don’t regard this as political. I can respect those who honestly believe in different political approaches to my own. I see this as much more basic than that. I see this as the difference between truth and lies. A battle between honesty and deception. I totally reject the idea that there is a global elite intent on controlling everything for their own benefit. I have more faith in the fundamental goodness of humanity than that. Flawed we may be. That evil exists among us is obvious but not in large numbers. There is simply no way that a global elite could organise itself to do what it is accused of doing, or be united in a self serving endeavour. It’s not real. I only see conspiracy theories being created by those who wish us harm in places where freedom of expression is restricted and spread into the minds of the easily impressionable via the modern media without any effective controls, then amplified by those who see an opportunity for profit. It’s no wonder to me that a surge of mistrust in science, business, government and institutions has occurred during the internet age. A time I regard as post truth. That others see it as healthy, and the time when previously accepted norms are being challenged, fails on every level, simply because almost always there is no real evidence, no peer review, no fact checking. When even fact-checkers are dismissed as bias you know something is seriously wrong. So it’s not having discussions directly with your children that concerns. It’s creating an environment in which lies are believed more than truths. It’s encouraging distrust. An open mind and a degree of scepticism is healthy, but only when the resolution is to seek genuine information from those qualified to give it. Not from self serving grifters on the internet. And a willingness to accept statements from those excused for being economical with the truth because, of course, they have our best interests at heart.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 05 Aug 23 10.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
And a willingness to accept statements from those excused for being economical with the truth because, of course, they have our best interests at heart. Sometimes, yes. Balancing the need for complete openness against the need for the security of the nation in a world in which many dangers exist cannot be easy. If done only for personal reasons, never. If done for our ultimate benefit, then ok. We don’t always all need to know everything. Some of us cannot be trusted.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 05 Aug 23 10.54pm | |
---|---|
When discussing who talks straight and who talks lies let's watch Dr Campbell's latest video of Pfizer answering questions on statements they put out regarding their vaccine.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 05 Aug 23 11.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Sometimes, yes. Balancing the need for complete openness against the need for the security of the nation in a world in which many dangers exist cannot be easy. If done only for personal reasons, never. If done for our ultimate benefit, then ok. We don’t always all need to know everything. Some of us cannot be trusted. So we only need to seek the truth on approved matters because we can't be trusted with it otherwise.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 05 Aug 23 11.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
So we only need to seek the truth on approved matters because we can't be trusted with it otherwise. That’s not what I said. I don’t want to be rude but try reading it again.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mattconrov 05 Aug 23 11.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I don’t regard this as political. I can respect those who honestly believe in different political approaches to my own. I see this as much more basic than that. I see this as the difference between truth and lies. A battle between honesty and deception. I totally reject the idea that there is a global elite intent on controlling everything for their own benefit. I have more faith in the fundamental goodness of humanity than that. Flawed we may be. That evil exists among us is obvious but not in large numbers. There is simply no way that a global elite could organise itself to do what it is accused of doing, or be united in a self serving endeavour. It’s not real. I only see conspiracy theories being created by those who wish us harm in places where freedom of expression is restricted and spread into the minds of the easily impressionable via the modern media without any effective controls, then amplified by those who see an opportunity for profit. It’s no wonder to me that a surge of mistrust in science, business, government and institutions has occurred during the internet age. A time I regard as post truth. That others see it as healthy, and the time when previously accepted norms are being challenged, fails on every level, simply because almost always there is no real evidence, no peer review, no fact checking. When even fact-checkers are dismissed as bias you know something is seriously wrong. So it’s not having discussions directly with your children that concerns. It’s creating an environment in which lies are believed more than truths. It’s encouraging distrust. An open mind and a degree of scepticism is healthy, but only when the resolution is to seek genuine information from those qualified to give it. Not from self serving grifters on the internet.
Perhaps you shouldn't take life so seriously. Yourself getting upset doesn't change anything. I know you'll say I'm not upset. But we've all been there ourselves. We are only here for a little while. In 50 years none of us will be here. Silly debates on this and that. That's all they are. Just take a rest and enjoy lovely Cornwall. I have close relations from Cornwall. Spent my childhood holidays in Penzance and isles of Scilly. Beautiful places.
" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 05 Aug 23 11.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That’s not what I said. I don’t want to be rude but try reading it again. Here's what you said. If done only for personal reasons, never. If done for our ultimate benefit, then ok. We don’t always all need to know everything. Some of us cannot be trusted. How are we supposed to know whether what we're being told is for personal reasons or not?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 06 Aug 23 12.00am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mattconrov
------------------------- I've deliberately taken a direct quote out of context you say. Whats the context then? "Covid vaccine and other GENE therapies. Hardly "jumping all over the place. I'm quoting directly. My understanding is they had to admit it was for gene therapy. Otherwise they could not have been able to give the grant. I don't have any definitive proof for that. But it seems likely. I'm fully aware the government have denied it's gene therapy. So the "vaccine" delivers the gene into the cytoplasm to make a cell express a certain protein. Now it's true to say that it would need to go into the nucleus for it to be officially gene therapy. But still the gene is going into the cell from the jab.
The Bayer guy admits it. It's not our of context. Again what is the context you have in mind? You are the one here gaslighting people on a tremendous scale spreading falsehoods. But very few are buying it. Edited by Mattconrov (04 Aug 2023 2.26pm) Edited by Mattconrov (04 Aug 2023 2.34pm) Edited by Mattconrov (04 Aug 2023 2.38pm) Christ Is this even still a thing in conspiracy circles? Very 2020/2021 It’s not gene therapy. I understand that RNA sounds like DNA. Bat also sounds like cat. If I can be bothered I’ll scroll back to the sequence where this is covered and explained in detail and repost. mRNA vaccines do not alter your genes
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 06 Aug 23 12.03am | |
---|---|
I do hope that everyone watches Campbells latest video and the questioning of the Pfizer representative it contains. It’s disgraceful and demonstrates exactly what I have been saying about him. Watch his smug face and the fake shock as the guy carefully avoids answering the loaded questions. Loaded with false assumptions and suggestions that they were expected to test in that way. They weren’t. It wasn’t part of the regulatory approval requirement. They were required to test for safety and efficacy in preventing disease, not in controlling infection. No doubt because it would have unnecessarily delayed the roll out and was a secondary issue. It was always the case that if you could prevent people from catching the disease, or from showing severe symptoms, that the chances of infecting others would also be reduced. It was only when the variants emerged which found a way around the protection that the specific advice, based on real time experience was updated. I am perfectly sure Campbell understands this only too well, and that the guy asking the loaded questions is doing so for his own dubious reasons. I wonder what the rest of that committee had to say about it. When I have some time I will try to find out. This is Campbell doing what he does. He is feeding the hungry vaccine sceptics with the diet of misinformation they want to hear and making bundles of money from it.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.