You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Coronavirus and the impact of Lockdown policy
November 25 2024 6.47am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Coronavirus and the impact of Lockdown policy

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 124 of 289 < 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 >

  

Mattconrov Flag 05 Aug 23 10.19pm Send a Private Message to Mattconrov Add Mattconrov as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

Pretty much agree on that, though I'm a bit of a square like that as I was never into all that....more the gym. I just got hammered occasionally on the booze when I was younger but that was always more social than being into it.

Yeah, it's funny when you hear about what the CIA and other security agencies are alleged to get up to......Literally being funded by their taxpayers to be the actual criminals.

Quite crazy.

Nothing really seems to have changed either.


So you've not done drugs. Drink occasionally and go to the gym. That's not being square. That's being intelligent/Chad.

 


" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 05 Aug 23 10.32pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Mattconrov


So you've not done drugs. Drink occasionally and go to the gym. That's not being square. That's being intelligent/Chad.

Cheers mate, cheque's in the post.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 05 Aug 23 10.34pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Mattconrov

Although I feel bringing my children into the conversation not too chilvalrous from you. I don't speak to my children about politics. I just give them lots of love - and money.

I don’t regard this as political. I can respect those who honestly believe in different political approaches to my own.

I see this as much more basic than that. I see this as the difference between truth and lies. A battle between honesty and deception. I totally reject the idea that there is a global elite intent on controlling everything for their own benefit. I have more faith in the fundamental goodness of humanity than that. Flawed we may be. That evil exists among us is obvious but not in large numbers. There is simply no way that a global elite could organise itself to do what it is accused of doing, or be united in a self serving endeavour. It’s not real.

I only see conspiracy theories being created by those who wish us harm in places where freedom of expression is restricted and spread into the minds of the easily impressionable via the modern media without any effective controls, then amplified by those who see an opportunity for profit.

It’s no wonder to me that a surge of mistrust in science, business, government and institutions has occurred during the internet age. A time I regard as post truth. That others see it as healthy, and the time when previously accepted norms are being challenged, fails on every level, simply because almost always there is no real evidence, no peer review, no fact checking. When even fact-checkers are dismissed as bias you know something is seriously wrong.

So it’s not having discussions directly with your children that concerns. It’s creating an environment in which lies are believed more than truths. It’s encouraging distrust. An open mind and a degree of scepticism is healthy, but only when the resolution is to seek genuine information from those qualified to give it. Not from self serving grifters on the internet.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 05 Aug 23 10.39pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I don’t regard this as political. I can respect those who honestly believe in different political approaches to my own.

I see this as much more basic than that. I see this as the difference between truth and lies. A battle between honesty and deception. I totally reject the idea that there is a global elite intent on controlling everything for their own benefit. I have more faith in the fundamental goodness of humanity than that. Flawed we may be. That evil exists among us is obvious but not in large numbers. There is simply no way that a global elite could organise itself to do what it is accused of doing, or be united in a self serving endeavour. It’s not real.

I only see conspiracy theories being created by those who wish us harm in places where freedom of expression is restricted and spread into the minds of the easily impressionable via the modern media without any effective controls, then amplified by those who see an opportunity for profit.

It’s no wonder to me that a surge of mistrust in science, business, government and institutions has occurred during the internet age. A time I regard as post truth. That others see it as healthy, and the time when previously accepted norms are being challenged, fails on every level, simply because almost always there is no real evidence, no peer review, no fact checking. When even fact-checkers are dismissed as bias you know something is seriously wrong.

So it’s not having discussions directly with your children that concerns. It’s creating an environment in which lies are believed more than truths. It’s encouraging distrust. An open mind and a degree of scepticism is healthy, but only when the resolution is to seek genuine information from those qualified to give it. Not from self serving grifters on the internet.

And a willingness to accept statements from those excused for being economical with the truth because, of course, they have our best interests at heart.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 05 Aug 23 10.53pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

And a willingness to accept statements from those excused for being economical with the truth because, of course, they have our best interests at heart.

Sometimes, yes.

Balancing the need for complete openness against the need for the security of the nation in a world in which many dangers exist cannot be easy.

If done only for personal reasons, never. If done for our ultimate benefit, then ok.

We don’t always all need to know everything. Some of us cannot be trusted.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 05 Aug 23 10.54pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

When discussing who talks straight and who talks lies let's watch Dr Campbell's latest video of Pfizer answering questions on statements they put out regarding their vaccine.

[Link]

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 05 Aug 23 11.02pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

Sometimes, yes.

Balancing the need for complete openness against the need for the security of the nation in a world in which many dangers exist cannot be easy.

If done only for personal reasons, never. If done for our ultimate benefit, then ok.

We don’t always all need to know everything. Some of us cannot be trusted.

So we only need to seek the truth on approved matters because we can't be trusted with it otherwise.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 05 Aug 23 11.40pm Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Teddy Eagle

So we only need to seek the truth on approved matters because we can't be trusted with it otherwise.

That’s not what I said. I don’t want to be rude but try reading it again.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Mattconrov Flag 05 Aug 23 11.46pm Send a Private Message to Mattconrov Add Mattconrov as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

I don’t regard this as political. I can respect those who honestly believe in different political approaches to my own.

I see this as much more basic than that. I see this as the difference between truth and lies. A battle between honesty and deception. I totally reject the idea that there is a global elite intent on controlling everything for their own benefit. I have more faith in the fundamental goodness of humanity than that. Flawed we may be. That evil exists among us is obvious but not in large numbers. There is simply no way that a global elite could organise itself to do what it is accused of doing, or be united in a self serving endeavour. It’s not real.

I only see conspiracy theories being created by those who wish us harm in places where freedom of expression is restricted and spread into the minds of the easily impressionable via the modern media without any effective controls, then amplified by those who see an opportunity for profit.

It’s no wonder to me that a surge of mistrust in science, business, government and institutions has occurred during the internet age. A time I regard as post truth. That others see it as healthy, and the time when previously accepted norms are being challenged, fails on every level, simply because almost always there is no real evidence, no peer review, no fact checking. When even fact-checkers are dismissed as bias you know something is seriously wrong.

So it’s not having discussions directly with your children that concerns. It’s creating an environment in which lies are believed more than truths. It’s encouraging distrust. An open mind and a degree of scepticism is healthy, but only when the resolution is to seek genuine information from those qualified to give it. Not from self serving grifters on the internet.


To be honest I don't know where to start with that lot. You seem to be worried about something.

Perhaps you shouldn't take life so seriously. Yourself getting upset doesn't change anything. I know you'll say I'm not upset. But we've all been there ourselves.

We are only here for a little while. In 50 years none of us will be here. Silly debates on this and that. That's all they are.
I started to comment on holmesdale because after reading the posts for years; I thought it would be a good idea to contribute.

Just take a rest and enjoy lovely Cornwall. I have close relations from Cornwall. Spent my childhood holidays in Penzance and isles of Scilly. Beautiful places.

 


" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Teddy Eagle Flag 05 Aug 23 11.53pm Send a Private Message to Teddy Eagle Add Teddy Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle

That’s not what I said. I don’t want to be rude but try reading it again.

Here's what you said.

If done only for personal reasons, never. If done for our ultimate benefit, then ok.

We don’t always all need to know everything. Some of us cannot be trusted.

How are we supposed to know whether what we're being told is for personal reasons or not?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Yellow Card - User has been warned of conduct on the messageboards SW19 CPFC Flag Addiscombe West 06 Aug 23 12.00am Send a Private Message to SW19 CPFC Add SW19 CPFC as a friend

Originally posted by Mattconrov

-------------------------

I've deliberately taken a direct quote out of context you say. Whats the context then? "Covid vaccine and other GENE therapies. Hardly "jumping all over the place. I'm quoting directly. My understanding is they had to admit it was for gene therapy. Otherwise they could not have been able to give the grant. I don't have any definitive proof for that. But it seems likely.

I'm fully aware the government have denied it's gene therapy.

So the "vaccine" delivers the gene into the cytoplasm to make a cell express a certain protein. Now it's true to say that it would need to go into the nucleus for it to be officially gene therapy. But still the gene is going into the cell from the jab.
Can we trust that it doesn't go elsewhere? Well I don't trust them. Neither does many vaccine experts.


However I don't trust big pharma or our government.
This is an experimental procedure. You can bang on about the technology being nothing new. But it has only been tested recently on humans - and it ain't going well

The Bayer guy admits it. It's not our of context. Again what is the context you have in mind?

You are the one here gaslighting people on a tremendous scale spreading falsehoods. But very few are buying it.

Edited by Mattconrov (04 Aug 2023 2.26pm)

Edited by Mattconrov (04 Aug 2023 2.34pm)

Edited by Mattconrov (04 Aug 2023 2.38pm)

Christ

Is this even still a thing in conspiracy circles? Very 2020/2021

It’s not gene therapy. I understand that RNA sounds like DNA. Bat also sounds like cat.

If I can be bothered I’ll scroll back to the sequence where this is covered and explained in detail and repost.

mRNA vaccines do not alter your genes

 


Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 06 Aug 23 12.03am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

I do hope that everyone watches Campbells latest video and the questioning of the Pfizer representative it contains.

It’s disgraceful and demonstrates exactly what I have been saying about him.

Watch his smug face and the fake shock as the guy carefully avoids answering the loaded questions.

Loaded with false assumptions and suggestions that they were expected to test in that way. They weren’t. It wasn’t part of the regulatory approval requirement. They were required to test for safety and efficacy in preventing disease, not in controlling infection. No doubt because it would have unnecessarily delayed the roll out and was a secondary issue. It was always the case that if you could prevent people from catching the disease, or from showing severe symptoms, that the chances of infecting others would also be reduced. It was only when the variants emerged which found a way around the protection that the specific advice, based on real time experience was updated.

I am perfectly sure Campbell understands this only too well, and that the guy asking the loaded questions is doing so for his own dubious reasons. I wonder what the rest of that committee had to say about it. When I have some time I will try to find out.

This is Campbell doing what he does. He is feeding the hungry vaccine sceptics with the diet of misinformation they want to hear and making bundles of money from it.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 124 of 289 < 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Coronavirus and the impact of Lockdown policy