This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 09 Mar 22 5.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Russian soldiers stealing chickens from Ukrainian citizens - [Link]
Shocking - not even organic or corn fed.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 09 Mar 22 6.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Shocking - not even organic or corn fed. And no-one on hand with a Quorn alternative. Unbelievable.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 09 Mar 22 6.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
And no-one on hand with a Quorn alternative. Unbelievable. If that doesn't warrant WWIII then nothing does.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 09 Mar 22 6.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
If that doesn't warrant WWIII then nothing does. I have my iodine tablets, and a chicken nugget in each ear. I'm ready.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 09 Mar 22 6.14pm | |
---|---|
Now wait for the usual suspects to say it is all lies or, if true, the fault of NATO and the West.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
steeleye20 Croydon 09 Mar 22 6.47pm | |
---|---|
'Anger and exhaustion as Ukrainians turned away by UK in Calais' 'They treated us worse than water in the toilet'. Its outrageous, and worse, shameful.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 09 Mar 22 6.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by georgenorman
Now wait for the usual suspects to say it is all lies or, if true, the fault of NATO and the West. [Tweet Link]
Yes, they're blatantly just indiscriminately bombing civilian areas .. A maternity hospital, during a ceasefire .. [Tweet Link]
then they deny doing so, despite seeing it with your own eyes. Not great behaviour to base peace talks on. Edited by BlueJay (09 Mar 2022 7.11pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 09 Mar 22 7.28pm | |
---|---|
One concern, for a few years now, has been the possibility of Russia enacting an "escalate to de-escalate" strategy. As in lowering the threshold for using say a very limited nuclear strike (perhaps just a single weapon), then essentially presenting the West with a dilemma - Concede that Russia can use nuclear weapons in this manner and allow it to be used as a bargaining tool and favourable terms for Russia - Respond in kind, risking further escalation and all out nuclear war. Putin doesn't seem to have an issue with behaving however he pleases and leaving the conundrums and horrors of where it could lead down to us to ponder. Hopefuly, for all of our sakes, he'd fall short of this though... but who knows.. Apparently the US had already considered and discussed this eventuality, and have deployed low-yield W76-2 warheads on submarines for this purpose (and there nuclear bombs on NATO airbases with adjustable yields). Edited by BlueJay (09 Mar 2022 7.39pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 09 Mar 22 7.53pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Interesting point. But independence was hard-won and took a long time. Losing it now would be a huge set-back and would result in the Ukrainian people having to bend the knee for a long long time to come. Once you see post Soviet life the idea of going back is truly unthinkable, which is why the people are prepared to die for future generations. I think you gave that post a great deal more respect than it merited.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The groover Danbury 09 Mar 22 10.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
One concern, for a few years now, has been the possibility of Russia enacting an "escalate to de-escalate" strategy. As in lowering the threshold for using say a very limited nuclear strike (perhaps just a single weapon), then essentially presenting the West with a dilemma - Concede that Russia can use nuclear weapons in this manner and allow it to be used as a bargaining tool and favourable terms for Russia - Respond in kind, risking further escalation and all out nuclear war. Putin doesn't seem to have an issue with behaving however he pleases and leaving the conundrums and horrors of where it could lead down to us to ponder. Hopefuly, for all of our sakes, he'd fall short of this though... but who knows.. Apparently the US had already considered and discussed this eventuality, and have deployed low-yield W76-2 warheads on submarines for this purpose (and there nuclear bombs on NATO airbases with adjustable yields). Edited by BlueJay (09 Mar 2022 7.39pm) Any use of nuclear weapons of any yield by Russia may well result in a pre-emptive strike by the US. They would attempt to take out most of their sites and deal with the subs as they launch. I'm sure they are trying to track the Russian subs. Cruise missiles would go under radar where as ICBMs wold be detected immediately. It would then be a question of what those weapons would do to the atmosphere and how many Russian nukes hit home. The defcon level was raised from 4 to 3 when this started. The cold war restarted when putin came to power. We last intercepted russian bear bombers headed for us on 2 Feb 2022 and turned them away before they hit our airspace. There have been 136 such incidents since 2005. All it takes is one of them to enter our airspace and it will be shot down. We can't take a chance that they launch.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 09 Mar 22 10.33pm | |
---|---|
Looking worryingly likely that Russia will to carry out a chemical or biological attack in Ukraine in the coming days. They've voiced their usual false claims of others, backed by China, and so a false flag attack may well be on the cards. I wouldn't be surprised to see a false attack on Russian soil to shore up public support, since many are clearly suspicious of the nazi narrative. It wouldn't be the first time, and I wouldn't put killing his own citizens to further his agenda beyond Putin.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 09 Mar 22 10.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The groover
Any use of nuclear weapons of any yield by Russia may well result in a pre-emptive strike by the US. They would attempt to take out most of their sites and deal with the subs as they launch. I'm sure they are trying to track the Russian subs. Cruise missiles would go under radar where as ICBMs wold be detected immediately. It would then be a question of what those weapons would do to the atmosphere and how many Russian nukes hit home. The defcon level was raised from 4 to 3 when this started. The cold war restarted when putin came to power. We last intercepted russian bear bombers headed for us on 2 Feb 2022 and turned them away before they hit our airspace. There have been 136 such incidents since 2005. All it takes is one of them to enter our airspace and it will be shot down. We can't take a chance that they launch. It's troubling that the more Russia struggle in Ukraine the more likely they are to escalate to save face. That's why peace talks certainly have their place, but the impact of this invasion on both Ukraine and Russia has been significant, and so I'm struggling to think of what agreement could be reached.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.