Link Doesn't work. Apologies

Edited by Mattconrov (03 Aug 2023 5.01pm)

Attachment: 1443052590344.gif (245×205) (0.06Kb)

" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.

It would be embarrassing if we used a fact check site. We all know what he's about. It takes all sorts. Thankfully not too many like him. Unfortunately the ones who are - are in power.

Interestingly I've just seen a document from the government website where they have admitted that the covid vaccine is gene therapy.

They made a 15.9 million pound donation to croda international plc.

I quote - "lipids are an essential part of covid vaccines and other GENE THERAPIES. Wisbech was so adamant they were normal vaccines.

I can't do links on my phone. But it's on [Link] department for business and trade.

You reading this Wisbech? Lol

Also I've come across the admission from Stefan Oelrich the president of Bayer pharmaceuticals. He says they are gene therapy. " But we couldn't say that originally otherwise the public wouldn't buy it. Thats on fact checker as false.

" The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears"

Edited by Mattconrov (03 Aug 2023 11.34pm)

" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.

So many people affected by it. I'm pleased she didn't have anymore.

Shredding was in the Pfzier trials. They admitted it may cause shredding.

But you're a conspiracy theorist for repeating what they've said. Lol

" You're not laughing now are you". Nigel Farage 2016.

Edited for accuracy!

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

[Link]

Kindly note that “other” is missing.

[Link]

Kindly note that Oelrich didn’t say that.

You are doing what so many who take the line you do. You read misinformation online and regard it as true, then circulate it in places like this screaming about how the establishment/msm/pharmaceutical industries etc etc are in league to control you.

It’s irresponsible and dangerous.

That you seek to undermine the contribution of the fact checkers only adds support for that. You are being encouraged to disbelieve them by the people spreading the misinformation. Just look at the arguments produced by the fact checkers and decide for yourself where the truth lies.

Edited by Wisbech Eagle (04 Aug 2023 8.56am)

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

I was busy yesterday afternoon and evening but have now read the drivel that’s been posted since.

It’s all so depressingly predictable and all over the web these days. As it’s all been responded to several times before in this thread, yet appears here again with its nonsense undiluted, there’s no point in me trying to again point out the falsehoods.

Those determined to believe lies and conspiracy theories are beyond help.

This is a potent example of the dangers inherent in the internet. The impressionable get sucked in to wild ideas which can harm them and those they love. I asked ChatGPT their opinion about this in the hope that it might have a better chance of being believed than me. This is the response:-

“The danger of internet misinformation is a significant and growing concern in today's digital age. Misinformation refers to false or misleading information that is spread through various online platforms, such as social media, websites, forums, and messaging apps. It can take the form of fabricated news stories, conspiracy theories, doctored images, misleading statistics, and false claims about various subjects.

Here are some of the key dangers of internet misinformation:

Misleading the Public: When false information spreads widely, it can mislead the public and shape their opinions and beliefs. This can have serious consequences in areas like public health, politics, and social issues, as people make decisions based on inaccurate information.
Impact on Democracy: Misinformation can undermine the democratic process by distorting public discourse and influencing elections. It can polarize societies, making it harder for people to find common ground and work towards shared solutions.
Public Health Risks: Misinformation related to health and medicine can be particularly dangerous. It can lead people to make harmful decisions regarding their health, reject evidence-based treatments, or even avoid vaccinations, leading to outbreaks of preventable diseases.
Economic Consequences: False information can affect businesses and markets, causing panic, speculation, and financial losses. It can also damage the reputation of companies or individuals unjustly.
Social Unrest and Violence: Misinformation can contribute to social unrest and even incite violence in extreme cases. Rumors and false narratives can spark conflicts and exacerbate tensions between communities.
Loss of Trust in Institutions: When misinformation is rampant, trust in traditional media, scientific institutions, and other credible sources of information can erode. This can create a society where facts are questioned, and baseless claims gain traction.
Algorithmic Amplification: Social media algorithms often prioritize content based on engagement, which can inadvertently promote sensationalist or false information. This "echo chamber" effect can reinforce existing beliefs and limit exposure to diverse perspectives.
Manipulation and Disinformation Campaigns: State actors, malicious groups, or individuals can use misinformation as part of disinformation campaigns to manipulate public opinion, sow discord, and achieve specific political or strategic goals.
Addressing the dangers of internet misinformation requires a multi-faceted approach involving individuals, technology platforms, governments, and media organizations. Fact-checking, media literacy programs, promoting critical thinking, and responsible online behavior are essential components of combating misinformation. Additionally, social media platforms need to implement measures to identify and limit the spread of false information without infringing on freedom of speech. Collaborative efforts by all stakeholders are crucial to mitigating the harmful effects of internet misinformation and fostering a more informed and responsible digital society.”

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.