This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
You would think a pink ball would be easier to see. Broad castles the NZ top order inc. Williamson quite extraordinary. Looks great out there.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
2nd and last test in this series against NZ. You certainly get a game with this bazball line-up. 210 runs to win with 9 wickets on the last day it could go either way, we are 1 up. Stokes declared earlier than he needed to, and followed on unwisely, he could not bowl himself. We will need a captain's knock I feel.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Harry Brook will do it on his own the form that he's in
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by steeleye20
2nd and last test in this series against NZ. You certainly get a game with this bazball line-up. 210 runs to win with 9 wickets on the last day it could go either way, we are 1 up. Stokes declared earlier than he needed to, and followed on unwisely, he could not bowl himself. We will need a captain's knock I feel. Enforcing the follow on is rarely wise IMO. Your bowlers, especially the pace need time to recover. 210 with 9 wickets should be a doddle if form is anything
I have now sufficient funds to last me the rest of my life. Provided I don't buy anything. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
232 test matches have been lost by the side following-on and only 3 test matches have been won (including England v Australia, Headingly 1981 of course). I knew about the '3' and I looked up the other two stats.
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
New Zealand's was the 12th highest follow-on score in test match history i.e. in the 295 matches where the follow-on has been "invited".
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglehamster
Enforcing the follow on is rarely wise IMO. Your bowlers, especially the pace need time to recover. 210 with 9 wickets should be a doddle if form is anything The weather forecast must be taken into account and perhaps Stokes was trying to beat the rain
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Harry Brook will do it on his own the form that he's in Run out for 0. 80-5 now 135-5 with Root yet another 50 and Stokes at the crease. It depends on them really.
|
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Originally posted by YT
232 test matches have been lost by the side following-on and only 3 test matches have been won (including England v Australia, Headingly 1981 of course). I knew about the '3' and I looked up the other two stats. Make that 4 test matches won by the team asked to follow-on!
Palace since 19 August 1972. Palace 1 (Tony Taylor) Liverpool 1 (Emlyn Hughes) |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
When test cricket is good it's the best. Unforgettable match for NZ. Their 1981 moment. Great for test cricket and praise to NZ but I bet Stokes is kicking himself.
I have now sufficient funds to last me the rest of my life. Provided I don't buy anything. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
---|---|
Amazing result, pity it was on in the middle of the night...
Glad All Over |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.