Actually disagree with that, which shows either how far he's fallen, how far we've come, or both.

The reason I say that is 1. he's permanently injured so even if he's being paid next to nothing, I'd rather have a stable team than one that's constantly trying to cope with players who aren't consistently available and 2. looking at some of the young talents in the club, I'd honestly rather give some of our own kids a go even if it costs us a few points than have their way blocked by a sicknote 31-year-old. Signing Ramsay would send a terrible message to the youngsters trying to break through and we neither are nor do we want to be that sort of club. It's one thing if you bring in talented youngish players like Dwight McNeil to compete with them but Ramsay? Really?

Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God.

Please No,
Always felt he was way overrated

Nope I'll happily uturn and agree with this.

A lazy point made (at a strawberry picking farm!) where I could make a lazy point as the newsnow blogs advocating this are, I suspect, little more than his agent planting reports in the hope that something might pop up.

If I was a betting man I think Fulham will take him on a pay per game deal.