This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Matov 22 Jan 20 11.55am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
So, albeit from a different perspective, you seem to agree with me!
Always thought Nandy was the most dangerous choice for the Right from the beginning. The only one who was not involved in the madness that was their second referendum policy. But do you honestly think your desire for a government of national unity to effectively scupper the Brexit vote would have made any difference to a GE result? The Tories would have simply linked up with the Brexit party and campaigned on a straight forward Leave manifesto and probably won an even bigger victory.
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 22 Jan 20 12.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Matov
Always thought Nandy was the most dangerous choice for the Right from the beginning. The only one who was not involved in the madness that was their second referendum policy. But do you honestly think your desire for a government of national unity to effectively scupper the Brexit vote would have made any difference to a GE result? The Tories would have simply linked up with the Brexit party and campaigned on a straight forward Leave manifesto and probably won an even bigger victory. I do. If the government of national unity had negotiated a soft Brexit deal with the EU and put that to the people in a 3 way choice of no Brexit, no deal, or a soft Brexit then I think we would have got a soft Brexit and would have "left" with the terms in place before a GE. As I think we would have needed PR to make that choice they could then argue that now is also the time to change our entire electoral system. That change will arrive. It's only a question of when and not of if. Farage would then have supported such a change as it would pretty much guarantee him a substantial voice in Parliament. It would though have split the Tories in two. It would not have stopped the arguments though. That's why I said that Labour would have been wise to have pushed for PR. With Corbyn out of the picture they would have appealed to a much wider group of voters and also been more amenable to tactical voting pacts. Of course Farage and Johnson could have made a deal themselves, and tried to convince everybody that a further renegotiation was needed, but with Brexit "done" I don't think that would have succeeded. Opportunity missed every bit as obviously as Tosun's was last night. Too late now. Just like Palace those who favour EU membership need a rest and then to come back full of fight and determination again.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 22 Jan 20 3.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Just like Palace those who favour EU membership need a rest and then to come back full of fight and determination again. Interesting analogy when you think how vocal our chairman has been in leaving the EU
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 22 Jan 20 4.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
So, albeit from a different perspective, you seem to agree with me! The time for Starmer was last Autumn when Johnson had lost his majority and the door was wide open for a coalition of the like minded to form an emergency temporary government with Starmer as the PM, hold another referendum, hopefully kick Brexit into the long grass and then hold an election. If Labour had any sense then they would have also supported moves to PR. I blame Corbyn for all of this. He gifted Johnson his victory and in so doing has set our country back decades. History will not be kind to him. For once I agree with you. All that talk of a government of national unity and of compromise and consensus when he really meant my way or the highway. The other opposition parties were willing to deal but I give them some credit they had "skin in the game". Their "skin" was risking alienating their core supporters e.g.student loans, they were willing to do this Corbyn however was not prepared to make a similar risk e.g. step aside for the good of the country. That's why those talks went no where. He wanted them to risk everything so he could get his hands on the levers of power. Edited by Badger11 (22 Jan 2020 4.01pm)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 22 Jan 20 4.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
For once I agree with you. All that talk of a government of national unity and of compromise and consensus when he really meant my way or the highway. The other opposition parties were willing to deal but I give them some credit they had "skin in the game". Their "skin" was risking alienating their core supporters e.g.student loans, they were willing to do this Corbyn however was not prepared to make a similar risk e.g. step aside for the good of the country. That's why those talks went no where. He wanted them to risk everything so he could get his hands on the levers of power. Edited by Badger11 (22 Jan 2020 4.01pm)
Labour's position on Brexit was just a peace keeping exercise. They have been bent over and Johnson-ed and now they want to look in the mirror and pretend it never happened. Edited by Stirlingsays (22 Jan 2020 4.24pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 22 Jan 20 4.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Labour's position on Brexit was just a peace keeping exercise. They have been bent over and Johnson-ed and now they want to look in the mirror and pretend it never happened. Edited by Stirlingsays (22 Jan 2020 4.24pm) I agree but he was the one calling for the other parties to join him, why should they unless he was prepared to give something up. Anyway I don't care there was a brief moment of opportunity for the Remain MPs and they blew so that's their fault. Roll on Jan 31.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 22 Jan 20 4.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
I agree but he was the one calling for the other parties to join him, why should they unless he was prepared to give something up. Anyway I don't care there was a brief moment of opportunity for the Remain MPs and they blew so that's their fault. Roll on Jan 31. What's the line in 'Life of Brian'? Are you the 'Judea people's front'?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 22 Jan 20 5.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
What's the line in 'Life of Brian'? Are you the 'Judea people's front'? Or in Corbyn's case the PLO.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 22 Jan 20 5.50pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Or in Corbyn's case the PLO. If only he had promoted the NKERS cause he could have merged the two and had a proper organisation.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 22 Jan 20 5.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
If only he had promoted the NKERS cause he could have merged the two and had a proper organisation.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 22 Jan 20 9.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Midlands Eagle
Interesting analogy when you think how vocal our chairman has been in leaving the EU So far as I am aware our injury crisis hasn't yet become so bad that the name of Parish has appeared on the team sheet! SJ might have put himself forward but not SP. It was the team, and not the Board, that was being compared.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Matov 09 Feb 20 3.17pm | |
---|---|
Some chatter out there about Starmer potentially being kicked out of the leadership race due to breaches of data policy. Papers are carrying reports of the actual accusations. LOL. Be funny if it were true and I am sure that many in the upper reaches of the Corbynite wing would love to help their gal RLB out. But even they could not be this stupid? Although to be fair this was the same party who thought a policy of offering even more Brexit to a nation sick to death of it all was a cracking idea so who knows? Or just a storm (pun fully intended given what is going on out there at the moment) in a Sunday tea-cup?
"The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command." - 1984 - George Orwell. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.