You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Is Islam, the new Nazi ?
November 24 2024 10.08am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Is Islam, the new Nazi ?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 12 of 41 < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 >

  

nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 18 Jun 14 7.33am

For those that are unaware, usually when someone says something is self righteous it usually means it is right, but they don't want to admit it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
matt_himself Flag Matataland 18 Jun 14 7.37am Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 18 Jun 2014 7.33am

For those that are unaware, usually when someone says something is self righteous it usually means it is right, but they don't want to admit it.


What did they teach you at Teacher Training?

Self Righteous

having or characterized by a certainty, especially an unfounded one, that one is totally correct or morally superior.
"self-righteous indignation and complacency"

synonyms: sanctimonious, holier-than-thou, self-satisfied, smug, priggish, complacent, too good to be true, pious, pietistic, moralizing, unctuous, superior, mealy-mouthed, hypocritical.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 18 Jun 14 7.46am

Quote matt_himself at 18 Jun 2014 7.37am

Quote nickgusset at 18 Jun 2014 7.33am

For those that are unaware, usually when someone says something is self righteous it usually means it is right, but they don't want to admit it.


What did they teach you at Teacher Training?

Self Righteous

having or characterized by a certainty, especially an unfounded one, that one is totally correct or morally superior.
"self-righteous indignation and complacency"

synonyms: sanctimonious, holier-than-thou, self-satisfied, smug, priggish, complacent, too good to be true, pious, pietistic, moralizing, unctuous, superior, mealy-mouthed, hypocritical.


I'm well aware of this. You use it as an insult as you cannot respond to the point because it is correct. It's also becoming over used by 'your sort' in the same way hand wringing liberal is.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
matt_himself Flag Matataland 18 Jun 14 8.13am Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 18 Jun 2014 7.46am

Quote matt_himself at 18 Jun 2014 7.37am

Quote nickgusset at 18 Jun 2014 7.33am

For those that are unaware, usually when someone says something is self righteous it usually means it is right, but they don't want to admit it.


What did they teach you at Teacher Training?

Self Righteous

having or characterized by a certainty, especially an unfounded one, that one is totally correct or morally superior.
"self-righteous indignation and complacency"

synonyms: sanctimonious, holier-than-thou, self-satisfied, smug, priggish, complacent, too good to be true, pious, pietistic, moralizing, unctuous, superior, mealy-mouthed, hypocritical.


I'm well aware of this. You use it as an insult as you cannot respond to the point because it is correct. It's also becoming over used by 'your sort' in the same way hand wringing liberal is.


I can respond to your point above: you are talking bollocks.

It is similar to people who use phrases like 'sticks and stone may break my bones' or 'the big ones fall furthest', it is total and utter s***e born out of a wish to deceive oneself.

You should wish to believe that I think Kermit is right, then either you cannot read properly, you are in a weird self delusion phase or on a wind up.

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 18 Jun 14 8.20am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Matthew - please be obsessed with someone other than me. Your last reply to a post of mine was the sign of someone who is losing the plot upstairs. Too much effort for such little effective goading.

Move on.

 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
matt_himself Flag Matataland 18 Jun 14 8.47am Send a Private Message to matt_himself Add matt_himself as a friend

Quote Kermit8 at 18 Jun 2014 8.20am

Matthew - please be obsessed with someone other than me. Your last reply to a post of mine was the sign of someone who is losing the plot upstairs. Too much effort for such little effective goading.

Move on.


So you are taking the moral high ground (again).

Me thinks a nerve has been touched...

 


"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 18 Jun 14 9.08am

Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Jun 2014 12.47am

Quote legaleagle at 18 Jun 2014 12.09am

To be British is to have freedom of expression. Are Sikhs a problem for you because they are "non western" Brits,ie by not wearing crash helmets?

Since when is it unBritish for you (or a British Muslim) to have a critical view of British foreign policy?

I cannot agree with you there is no hypocrisy ever in a country's foreign policy just because it is self-interested. Our own history is littered with such hypocrisies (and, yes, self interest)..we have supported (and armed) dictators when it suited us and at other times tried to oust the same dictators...Saddam anyone? The Emperor of Japan (pre 1945).

On the question of the letter, I do not know, any more than you do. But, I correct myself. I should have said "anonymous and allegedly forged". Is the opinion of the (non muslim) deputy head teacher of one of the schools who described it as a hatchet job any less valid? I wasn't coming down on any side. Rather, seeking to understand and be critical of knee jerkism on all sides. Those who rule out any possibility of a calculated hatchet job (albeit one that backfired spectacularly) are as blinkered as those who say the opposite. Its called having an open mind, another British "western" value, no?

It isn't un-British to be critical of foreign policy or indeed to hold most views.

However, I repeat, to be British is to be western. If someone is anti-western then they are by implication anti-British. I think this is perhaps a question of language.

Also, I repeat, there is no hypocrisy in foreign policy only self interest. If you feel that we have behaved somehow different to any other country please name me a country that acts behaved in the same way? I'd like to research this 'ethical' country.

Also, I have to make the point here that 'we' have never 'ousted' dictators or whoever on our own without the support of groups within the country itself.

Sure we have interfered and affected results but no country.....Unless it has gone to war....Overthrows a regime without considerable help from fractions within the country itself.

Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Jun 2014 12.48am)

I think you may have missed my point re foreign policy. Of course most countries most of the time have hypocritical foreign policies. My point was that, regardless of this, many young idealistic people in those countries may feel affronted by such policies, particularly where the policies are lacking in any veneer of sophisticated rhetorical justification. In some cases (anti-Vietnam war)it can cause whole sectors of the population to feel estranged from the whole system in their countries...

If we want to have any chance of understanding why some young British Muslims might start to feel estranged from the "system" here, we need to be open to the possibility that their feelings of antipathy to aspects of our foreign policy are not automatically "anti-western" but no different in that way, say, to the example of the anti-Vietnam war protesters....I think things are less simplistic and more complex than that...so, we demonise people in a simplistic kneejerk way at our peril..

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
TI-508 Flag 18 Jun 14 9.32am

How many anti-Vietnam war demonstrators blew up trains and buses, killed soldiers in the streets and went off to fight for the Viet-Cong?

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
legaleagle Flag 18 Jun 14 9.33am


It does seem strange that OFSTED went into one of the schools, passed it, then went in the next week and put the school into special measures.

What the trojan horse affair did highlight (to be fair I don't know the whole story and have heard many conflicting reports) is that a lot of the problems were down to the fact that the schools are out of L.A control and therefore under the remit of the DFE (what happened to the tories pledge of a degree of localism during the election run up.
What is also clear is the hypocrisy of those that say it's ok to have catholic and c of e schools where the faith of the majority is followed in daily worship (a loose term) but as soon as a school starts to push muslim values it is a problem. More creeping islamophobia in the media?
Personally I think ALL schools should be secular.

I know this is the grauniad, but Sir Tim Brighouse's assessment of the affair and the implication is by far the most balanced I've read on the subject so far.

[Link]

Edited by nickgusset (17 Jun 2014 11.34pm)

Certainly seem to be two sides to the story. From yesterday's Birmingham Mail:

"A senior teacher at a Birmingham school accused of failing to protect children from extremism has told MPs staff never tolerated any extremist views.

And Lee Donaghy, Vice Principal of Park View School in Alum Rock, hit back at a damning Ofsted report by insisting the Trojan Horse controversy came from “plain old Islamaphobia, either witting or unwitting”.

Ofsted last week placed five schools – including three in the Park View Academy – into special measures after a series of snap inspections following claims of a takeover plot by hardline Muslims.

Inspectors said they discovered a “culture of fear and intimidation” in some schools, with some governors accused of exerting “inappropriate influence” over how they were being run.

The Commons Home Affairs Committee is conducting an inquiry into the Trojan Horse allegations.

But today MPs also heard evidence from Councillor Brigid Jones, Cabinet Member for Children and Family Services at Birmingham City Council, who insisted she had seen no evidence of extremism in city schools. She said: “Any direct evidence of extremism has yet to be presented to me.”

And Mark Rogers, Birmingham City Council’s Chief Executive, questioned the authenticity of the Trojan Horse document. He said: “I have yet to be convinced that it is an authentic letter from one plotter to another. I think what it sets out is a set of issues that somebody had some concerns about and wanted action over.”

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Stirlingsays Flag 18 Jun 14 9.37am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Quote legaleagle at 18 Jun 2014 9.08am

I think you may have missed my point re foreign policy. Of course most countries most of the time have hypocritical foreign policies. My point was that, regardless of this, many young idealistic people in those countries may feel affronted by such policies, particularly where the policies are lacking in any veneer of sophisticated rhetorical justification. In some cases (anti-Vietnam war)it can cause whole sectors of the population to feel estranged from the whole system in their countries...

If we want to have any chance of understanding why some young British Muslims might start to feel estranged from the "system" here, we need to be open to the possibility that their feelings of antipathy to aspects of our foreign policy are not automatically "anti-western" but no different in that way, say, to the example of the anti-Vietnam war protesters....I think things are less simplistic and more complex than that...so, we demonise people in a simplistic kneejerk way at our peril..


There's no point missed.....We just see the world differently.

Any foreign policy decision is going to annoy someone. Governments who bother with concerns over sections of their population with mixed loyalties are weak eggshell governments.

A government should do what it believes in.

Britain has been going to war with other Christian countries all though its history without fear from its own church goers.....If people ask for equality in terms of being 'British', which I'm happy to accept then I also don't accept any anti western attitudes....These are westerners by their own choice.

I feel it is a shoehorn comparison between US Vietnam war protesters and 'British' Muslims who have mixed loyalties over foreign policy due to religion. A better comparison would be between those who objected to the wars without allegiance or religion problems being a factor.

While I feel both wars were necessary given their circumstance (with Iraq being the weakest) I at least respect objections based upon going to war itself....As war is extreme by its very nature.

Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Jun 2014 5.47pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
Kermit8 Flag Hevon 18 Jun 14 10.28am Send a Private Message to Kermit8 Add Kermit8 as a friend

Quote matt_himself at 18 Jun 2014 8.47am

Quote Kermit8 at 18 Jun 2014 8.20am

Matthew - please be obsessed with someone other than me. Your last reply to a post of mine was the sign of someone who is losing the plot upstairs. Too much effort for such little effective goading.

Move on.


So you are taking the moral high ground (again).

Me thinks a nerve has been touched...

Hmmm..if that was your aim doesn't that make you a...*gasp*...troll?

Try harder. Bitchy girl posts are hardly gonna ruffle any feathers here. Man up.


 


Big chest and massive boobs

[Link]


Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 18 Jun 14 1.08pm

All schools should be free of religeous influence, ownership and control. The duty of the state is to provide education to its citizens.

Meanwhile, faith groups should be free to offer part time religeous tuition, outside of core school hours (mornings, afternoons, evenings and weekends).

Bit hardline, but generally having met people who've been to Catholic school, strongly protestant schools, and recent events regarding Islamic school and the whole US issues regarding the christian right and schools.

Its all a form of conditioning aimed at securing that religeous organisations future client basis. Its a racket of generations thats essentially social programming for children to 'adopt the beliefs' of their parents.

We should be teaching kids to think for themselves and then let them make their own decisions.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 12 of 41 < 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Is Islam, the new Nazi ?