This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 18 Jun 14 7.33am | |
---|---|
For those that are unaware, usually when someone says something is self righteous it usually means it is right, but they don't want to admit it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 18 Jun 14 7.37am | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 18 Jun 2014 7.33am
For those that are unaware, usually when someone says something is self righteous it usually means it is right, but they don't want to admit it.
Self Righteous having or characterized by a certainty, especially an unfounded one, that one is totally correct or morally superior. synonyms: sanctimonious, holier-than-thou, self-satisfied, smug, priggish, complacent, too good to be true, pious, pietistic, moralizing, unctuous, superior, mealy-mouthed, hypocritical.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 18 Jun 14 7.46am | |
---|---|
Quote matt_himself at 18 Jun 2014 7.37am
Quote nickgusset at 18 Jun 2014 7.33am
For those that are unaware, usually when someone says something is self righteous it usually means it is right, but they don't want to admit it.
Self Righteous having or characterized by a certainty, especially an unfounded one, that one is totally correct or morally superior. synonyms: sanctimonious, holier-than-thou, self-satisfied, smug, priggish, complacent, too good to be true, pious, pietistic, moralizing, unctuous, superior, mealy-mouthed, hypocritical.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 18 Jun 14 8.13am | |
---|---|
Quote nickgusset at 18 Jun 2014 7.46am
Quote matt_himself at 18 Jun 2014 7.37am
Quote nickgusset at 18 Jun 2014 7.33am
For those that are unaware, usually when someone says something is self righteous it usually means it is right, but they don't want to admit it.
Self Righteous having or characterized by a certainty, especially an unfounded one, that one is totally correct or morally superior. synonyms: sanctimonious, holier-than-thou, self-satisfied, smug, priggish, complacent, too good to be true, pious, pietistic, moralizing, unctuous, superior, mealy-mouthed, hypocritical.
It is similar to people who use phrases like 'sticks and stone may break my bones' or 'the big ones fall furthest', it is total and utter s***e born out of a wish to deceive oneself. You should wish to believe that I think Kermit is right, then either you cannot read properly, you are in a weird self delusion phase or on a wind up.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 18 Jun 14 8.20am | |
---|---|
Matthew - please be obsessed with someone other than me. Your last reply to a post of mine was the sign of someone who is losing the plot upstairs. Too much effort for such little effective goading. Move on.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
matt_himself Matataland 18 Jun 14 8.47am | |
---|---|
Quote Kermit8 at 18 Jun 2014 8.20am
Matthew - please be obsessed with someone other than me. Your last reply to a post of mine was the sign of someone who is losing the plot upstairs. Too much effort for such little effective goading. Move on.
Me thinks a nerve has been touched...
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 18 Jun 14 9.08am | |
---|---|
Quote Stirlingsays at 18 Jun 2014 12.47am
Quote legaleagle at 18 Jun 2014 12.09am
To be British is to have freedom of expression. Are Sikhs a problem for you because they are "non western" Brits,ie by not wearing crash helmets? Since when is it unBritish for you (or a British Muslim) to have a critical view of British foreign policy? I cannot agree with you there is no hypocrisy ever in a country's foreign policy just because it is self-interested. Our own history is littered with such hypocrisies (and, yes, self interest)..we have supported (and armed) dictators when it suited us and at other times tried to oust the same dictators...Saddam anyone? The Emperor of Japan (pre 1945). On the question of the letter, I do not know, any more than you do. But, I correct myself. I should have said "anonymous and allegedly forged". Is the opinion of the (non muslim) deputy head teacher of one of the schools who described it as a hatchet job any less valid? I wasn't coming down on any side. Rather, seeking to understand and be critical of knee jerkism on all sides. Those who rule out any possibility of a calculated hatchet job (albeit one that backfired spectacularly) are as blinkered as those who say the opposite. Its called having an open mind, another British "western" value, no? It isn't un-British to be critical of foreign policy or indeed to hold most views. However, I repeat, to be British is to be western. If someone is anti-western then they are by implication anti-British. I think this is perhaps a question of language. Also, I repeat, there is no hypocrisy in foreign policy only self interest. If you feel that we have behaved somehow different to any other country please name me a country that acts behaved in the same way? I'd like to research this 'ethical' country. Also, I have to make the point here that 'we' have never 'ousted' dictators or whoever on our own without the support of groups within the country itself. Sure we have interfered and affected results but no country.....Unless it has gone to war....Overthrows a regime without considerable help from fractions within the country itself. Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Jun 2014 12.48am) I think you may have missed my point re foreign policy. Of course most countries most of the time have hypocritical foreign policies. My point was that, regardless of this, many young idealistic people in those countries may feel affronted by such policies, particularly where the policies are lacking in any veneer of sophisticated rhetorical justification. In some cases (anti-Vietnam war)it can cause whole sectors of the population to feel estranged from the whole system in their countries... If we want to have any chance of understanding why some young British Muslims might start to feel estranged from the "system" here, we need to be open to the possibility that their feelings of antipathy to aspects of our foreign policy are not automatically "anti-western" but no different in that way, say, to the example of the anti-Vietnam war protesters....I think things are less simplistic and more complex than that...so, we demonise people in a simplistic kneejerk way at our peril..
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TI-508 18 Jun 14 9.32am | |
---|---|
How many anti-Vietnam war demonstrators blew up trains and buses, killed soldiers in the streets and went off to fight for the Viet-Cong?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 18 Jun 14 9.33am | |
---|---|
What the trojan horse affair did highlight (to be fair I don't know the whole story and have heard many conflicting reports) is that a lot of the problems were down to the fact that the schools are out of L.A control and therefore under the remit of the DFE (what happened to the tories pledge of a degree of localism during the election run up. I know this is the grauniad, but Sir Tim Brighouse's assessment of the affair and the implication is by far the most balanced I've read on the subject so far. Edited by nickgusset (17 Jun 2014 11.34pm) Certainly seem to be two sides to the story. From yesterday's Birmingham Mail: And Lee Donaghy, Vice Principal of Park View School in Alum Rock, hit back at a damning Ofsted report by insisting the Trojan Horse controversy came from “plain old Islamaphobia, either witting or unwitting”. Ofsted last week placed five schools – including three in the Park View Academy – into special measures after a series of snap inspections following claims of a takeover plot by hardline Muslims. Inspectors said they discovered a “culture of fear and intimidation” in some schools, with some governors accused of exerting “inappropriate influence” over how they were being run. The Commons Home Affairs Committee is conducting an inquiry into the Trojan Horse allegations. But today MPs also heard evidence from Councillor Brigid Jones, Cabinet Member for Children and Family Services at Birmingham City Council, who insisted she had seen no evidence of extremism in city schools. She said: “Any direct evidence of extremism has yet to be presented to me.” And Mark Rogers, Birmingham City Council’s Chief Executive, questioned the authenticity of the Trojan Horse document. He said: “I have yet to be convinced that it is an authentic letter from one plotter to another. I think what it sets out is a set of issues that somebody had some concerns about and wanted action over.”
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 18 Jun 14 9.37am | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 18 Jun 2014 9.08am
I think you may have missed my point re foreign policy. Of course most countries most of the time have hypocritical foreign policies. My point was that, regardless of this, many young idealistic people in those countries may feel affronted by such policies, particularly where the policies are lacking in any veneer of sophisticated rhetorical justification. In some cases (anti-Vietnam war)it can cause whole sectors of the population to feel estranged from the whole system in their countries... If we want to have any chance of understanding why some young British Muslims might start to feel estranged from the "system" here, we need to be open to the possibility that their feelings of antipathy to aspects of our foreign policy are not automatically "anti-western" but no different in that way, say, to the example of the anti-Vietnam war protesters....I think things are less simplistic and more complex than that...so, we demonise people in a simplistic kneejerk way at our peril..
Any foreign policy decision is going to annoy someone. Governments who bother with concerns over sections of their population with mixed loyalties are weak eggshell governments. A government should do what it believes in. Britain has been going to war with other Christian countries all though its history without fear from its own church goers.....If people ask for equality in terms of being 'British', which I'm happy to accept then I also don't accept any anti western attitudes....These are westerners by their own choice. I feel it is a shoehorn comparison between US Vietnam war protesters and 'British' Muslims who have mixed loyalties over foreign policy due to religion. A better comparison would be between those who objected to the wars without allegiance or religion problems being a factor. While I feel both wars were necessary given their circumstance (with Iraq being the weakest) I at least respect objections based upon going to war itself....As war is extreme by its very nature. Edited by Stirlingsays (18 Jun 2014 5.47pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Kermit8 Hevon 18 Jun 14 10.28am | |
---|---|
Quote matt_himself at 18 Jun 2014 8.47am
Quote Kermit8 at 18 Jun 2014 8.20am
Matthew - please be obsessed with someone other than me. Your last reply to a post of mine was the sign of someone who is losing the plot upstairs. Too much effort for such little effective goading. Move on.
Me thinks a nerve has been touched... Hmmm..if that was your aim doesn't that make you a...*gasp*...troll? Try harder. Bitchy girl posts are hardly gonna ruffle any feathers here. Man up.
Big chest and massive boobs |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 18 Jun 14 1.08pm | |
---|---|
All schools should be free of religeous influence, ownership and control. The duty of the state is to provide education to its citizens. Meanwhile, faith groups should be free to offer part time religeous tuition, outside of core school hours (mornings, afternoons, evenings and weekends). Bit hardline, but generally having met people who've been to Catholic school, strongly protestant schools, and recent events regarding Islamic school and the whole US issues regarding the christian right and schools. Its all a form of conditioning aimed at securing that religeous organisations future client basis. Its a racket of generations thats essentially social programming for children to 'adopt the beliefs' of their parents. We should be teaching kids to think for themselves and then let them make their own decisions.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.