This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
eaglesdare 18 May 22 3.26pm | |
---|---|
Since testing positive on Friday (Unvaccinated). Few headaches, chest pain and tiredness over the weekend I am back to full energy! Did a HIIT this morning and just finished putting together two IKEA lockers!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 18 May 22 3.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
The same tired pejoratives such as "tin foil hatter", "conspiracy theorist", "climate denier" are no different to "anti-vaxxer?" or "racist", "misogynist", "homophobe", "transphobe" etc - they are simply used to shut down reasonable debate which is all you can do when the facts and evidence fail you but are unwilling to challenge your own worldview. I think people should at least realise that they are being asked to participate in what's been termed "the great narrative" where there is only one "correct" opinion you can have on any subject whether that's man made climate change, COVID, Ukraine, feminism, LGBT, BLM or whatever. Even to challenge on climate change is now being referred to as "hate". (you will notice they always put this adjacent to the usual suspects such as David Icke to illegitimise opposing views) counterhate.com by the way is funded by the Oak Foundation which in turn is funded by the Chinese. I wouldn't include Badger in that but I think the elitist drive to shut down opinions they don't like has been in full swing for years now. The Biden administration and indeed our own Tories are all carrying that out demonstrating that it's leadership driven across all the mainstream....they taking the perspectives from the worldwide elite funded organisations above them....how else could you see Mr 'Letterbox and wide smiles' Johnson himself supporting an 'online safety' bill that basically zips his previous version up. They use any event or disaster as justification for their authoritarian drive against freedoms that previous generations took for granted. Edited by Stirlingsays (18 May 2022 3.45pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 18 May 22 3.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
Since testing positive on Friday (Unvaccinated). Few headaches, chest pain and tiredness over the weekend I am back to full energy! Did a HIIT this morning and just finished putting together two IKEA lockers! Chad!
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 May 22 1.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
The same tired pejoratives such as "tin foil hatter", "conspiracy theorist", "climate denier" are no different to "anti-vaxxer?" or "racist", "misogynist", "homophobe", "transphobe" etc - they are simply used to shut down reasonable debate which is all you can do when the facts and evidence fail you but are unwilling to challenge your own worldview. I think people should at least realise that they are being asked to participate in what's been termed "the great narrative" where there is only one "correct" opinion you can have on any subject whether that's man made climate change, COVID, Ukraine, feminism, LGBT, BLM or whatever. Even to challenge on climate change is now being referred to as "hate". (you will notice they always put this adjacent to the usual suspects such as David Icke to illegitimise opposing views) counterhate.com by the way is funded by the Oak Foundation which in turn is funded by the Chinese. You must use the same kind of bs pipeline that your nearly mate from the Fens does. Those words are pejoratives for good reason. They all describe positions based on falsehoods, or which are no longer socially acceptable. No-one stops you taking up such positions and arguing for them, unless you go too far and break the law. The fact that you do so here is evidence of that. Idiotic positions can be held, but they can also be exposed and described, so don't be surprised when they are. Opposing the widely accepted, and scientifically established, consensus on climate change isn't hated. It is ridiculed for being stupid. You can hold whatever opinions you like, even when they are obvious nonsense. The reason David Icke gets mentioned is he is a supreme example of the attitude and company you are sharing. Your assertion about the Oak Foundation appears to have come down the bs pipeline. I see no evidence for it being true, although it is always possible the Chinese do contribute, in some way. Its aims and grants seem noble to me. From its website:- "The Oak Foundation, established in 1998, consists of a group of charitable and philanthropic organisations. The foundation's funding comes from an interest in the Duty Free Shoppers business".
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 19 May 22 1.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
You must use the same kind of bs pipeline that your nearly mate from the Fens does. Those words are pejoratives for good reason. They all describe positions based on falsehoods, or which are no longer socially acceptable. No-one stops you taking up such positions and arguing for them, unless you go too far and break the law. The fact that you do so here is evidence of that. Idiotic positions can be held, but they can also be exposed and described, so don't be surprised when they are. Opposing the widely accepted, and scientifically established, consensus on climate change isn't hated. It is ridiculed for being stupid. You can hold whatever opinions you like, even when they are obvious nonsense. The reason David Icke gets mentioned is he is a supreme example of the attitude and company you are sharing. Your assertion about the Oak Foundation appears to have come down the bs pipeline. I see no evidence for it being true, although it is always possible the Chinese do contribute, in some way. Its aims and grants seem noble to me. From its website:- "The Oak Foundation, established in 1998, consists of a group of charitable and philanthropic organisations. The foundation's funding comes from an interest in the Duty Free Shoppers business". You literally don't have any arguments and apparently no access to a search engine. You are the perfect useful idiot. Edited by W12 (19 May 2022 1.20pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 19 May 22 1.30pm | |
---|---|
From the national library of medicine (with 74 independent references): "The COVID-19 pandemic is one of the most manipulated infectious disease events in history, characterized by official lies in an unending stream lead by government bureaucracies, medical associations, medical boards, the media, and international agencies.[3,6,57] We have witnessed a long list of unprecedented intrusions into medical practice, including attacks on medical experts, destruction of medical careers among doctors refusing to participate in killing their patients and a massive regimentation of health care, led by non-qualified individuals with enormous wealth, power and influence"
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 19 May 22 1.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
You must use the same kind of bs pipeline that your nearly mate from the Fens does. Those words are pejoratives for good reason. They all describe positions based on falsehoods, or which are no longer socially acceptable. No-one stops you taking up such positions and arguing for them, unless you go too far and break the law. The fact that you do so here is evidence of that. Idiotic positions can be held, but they can also be exposed and described, so don't be surprised when they are. Opposing the widely accepted, and scientifically established, consensus on climate change isn't hated. It is ridiculed for being stupid. You can hold whatever opinions you like, even when they are obvious nonsense. The reason David Icke gets mentioned is he is a supreme example of the attitude and company you are sharing. Your assertion about the Oak Foundation appears to have come down the bs pipeline. I see no evidence for it being true, although it is always possible the Chinese do contribute, in some way. Its aims and grants seem noble to me. From its website:- "The Oak Foundation, established in 1998, consists of a group of charitable and philanthropic organisations. The foundation's funding comes from an interest in the Duty Free Shoppers business". By the way, do you want to buy some magic beans?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 19 May 22 1.40pm | |
---|---|
Jeez is this thread still trundling on? It's rather passe, rather 2021.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 19 May 22 1.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Jimenez
Jeez is this thread still trundling on? It's rather passe, rather 2021. Yes, I wonder where that came from?
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 19 May 22 1.57pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Yes, I wonder where that came from? It's the "new normal"
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 May 22 2.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
You literally don't have any arguments and apparently no access to a search engine. You are the perfect useful idiot. Edited by W12 (19 May 2022 1.20pm) If you applied that remark to yourself, you would be completely correct.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Nicholas91 The Democratic Republic of Kent 19 May 22 2.14pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
If you applied that remark to yourself, you would be completely correct. Ah, good to see the return of "I know you are, but what am I?"
Now Zaha's got a bit of green grass ahead of him here... and finds Ambrose... not a bad effort!!!! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.