This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 06 Feb 22 9.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
It certainly did to an extent with Delta (contracting and transmitting) but all evidence points towards prior vaccination or infection having a more limited impact on Omicron.. Some studies on both prior infection 'and' vaccination in combination suggest that may be the most protective combination though how that translates into the real world may take longer to know. The push of what you're suggesting is true though. That being vaccinated isn't some magical way out of Omicron (which shouldn't be all that bad for most people anyway). Due to this and its increased transmission rate, I don't really see the intention of dodging it forever more to be a very realistic one in combination with living a normal life. Personally I regard the position that being vaccinated against Delta significantly stopped transmission in the real world as unproven. That is something that should be firmed up either way overtime.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 06 Feb 22 10.02pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Vaccines had governmental approval, that's a powerful message. Those who were against vaccines actually represented a small minority. They were there and could have been debated...a much much louder group where those around covid policies, media control, mandates and restrictions. Everyone was there to be debated....yet mainstream media both broadcast and press acted as an arm of the government. What should be made clear is that we are not a nanny state and that adults must....repeat must be responsible for their own actions and decisions. I am very against the charge that the state is your keeper....helper where it can...yes. I'm for a society that is taught that clearly and not for one that gives false impressions of certainty and reliance in a world that can't actually provide much when it comes down to it. In my view the sum of your contributions has been one to disproportionately talk down the vaccine in terms of protective effect beyond the reality. I'm not saying that's through intention, just that anyone not reading the rarely tagged on 'maybe its helpful for the elderly' once in a blue moon would be disproportionately convinced to give it a miss more often to the detriment at the time of their health. I think based on your own 'i know my body' choice you have effectively gone on what amounts to some kind of crusade to represent that view. Personally I think the anti vax and vax hesitant voices had appropriate weight and am glad the initial take up was so high to offer a society wide base of support against this virus, that is then built on by natural infection. To my mind take up is and will now naturally diminish, hence any remaining restrictions along with it. A natural progression. Ultimately people should be able to make the choice for them, but i'd rather they didn't view dodging the vaccine like dodging a bullet [Link] Is this man dying 'free', or has he just been brainwashed to the point he's willing to die for no reason? Of course Americans often seem more all or nothing though. With the vaccine here, I'd say 99% of people seem very reasonable and balanced with regard to it and that take up will broadly relate to the trajectory of the virus. Edited by BlueJay (06 Feb 2022 10.11pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 06 Feb 22 10.10pm | |
---|---|
In any case, after saying that there's basic principles that most can surely agree on, and then getting drawn into covid discussion number 274, I'm not doing doing a good job at proving my own point . So will exit stage left!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 06 Feb 22 10.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
In my view the sum of your contributions has been one to disproportionately talk down the vaccine in terms of protective effect beyond the reality. I'm not saying that's through intention, just that anyone not reading the rarely tagged on 'maybe its helpful for the elderly' once in a blue moon would be disproportionately convinced to give it a miss more often to the detriment at the time of their health. I think based on your own 'i know my body' choice you have effectively gone on what amounts to some kind of crusade to represent that view. Personally I think the anti vax and vax hesitant voices had appropriate weight and am glad the initial take up was so high to offer a society wide base of support against this virus, that is then built on by natural infection. To my mind take up is and will now naturally diminish, hence any remaining restrictions along with it. A natural progression. Ultimately people should be able to make the choice for them, but i'd rather they didn't view dodging the vaccine like dodging a bullet [Link] Is this man dying 'free', or has he just been brainwashed to the point he's willing to die for no reason? Of course Americans often seem more all or nothing though. With the vaccine here, I'd say 99% of people seem very reasonable and balanced with regard to it and that take up will broadly relate to the trajectory of the virus.
It's true that most of my posts have been based upon scepticism for a long time now....and I can see how some might view that as OTT or as creating doubts in minds that some might not like. However, early on I was very much a supporter of the development of vaccines and while I have questions of what happened around the development and handling I have always supported the effort to create medical pushbacks against this horrible blow we all were dealt. A lot of it is to do with how things have been handled....pushing it onto the young...well it's all documented. I just never expected things to develop how they did....Before the vaccines I never envisaged people being arrested for walking a set distance. Locking down the healthy, paying people to stay off work. I still can't get my head around what happened there...it became a police state...the state went nuts. But I think that before and after vaccine development society was subjected to a campaign like never before....it is how it is now...It's very different to the more libertarian messages that I would far prefer society take on...which is of an adult like debate and appraisal of personal risk and assessment and not a slavish expectation of certainty from the state....which is what is now expected from it. I just don't think it's honest nor deliverable and creates the wrong expectations. Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Feb 2022 10.31pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 06 Feb 22 11.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Before the vaccines I never envisaged people being arrested for walking a set distance. Locking down the healthy, paying people to stay off work. I still can't get my head around what happened there...it became a police state...the state went nuts. But I think that before and after vaccine development society was subjected to a campaign like never before....it is how it is now...It's very different to the more libertarian messages that I would far prefer society take on...which is of an adult like debate and appraisal of personal risk and assessment and not a slavish expectation of certainty from the state....which is what is now expected from it. I just don't think it's honest nor deliverable and creates the wrong expectations. Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Feb 2022 10.31pm) I certainly see how most have reached the end of their tether in terms of the restrictions, which were certainly extreme. For what it's worth, with the massive sacrifices made while apparently those issuing these edicts were living it up, I'm not sure that people will be all that eager to pay much attention to restrictions if ever asked again in future.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 06 Feb 22 11.15pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
In my view the sum of your contributions has been one to disproportionately talk down the vaccine in terms of protective effect beyond the reality. I'm not saying that's through intention, just that anyone not reading the rarely tagged on 'maybe its helpful for the elderly' once in a blue moon would be disproportionately convinced to give it a miss more often to the detriment at the time of their health. I think based on your own 'i know my body' choice you have effectively gone on what amounts to some kind of crusade to represent that view. Personally I think the anti vax and vax hesitant voices had appropriate weight and am glad the initial take up was so high to offer a society wide base of support against this virus, that is then built on by natural infection. To my mind take up is and will now naturally diminish, hence any remaining restrictions along with it. A natural progression. Ultimately people should be able to make the choice for them, but i'd rather they didn't view dodging the vaccine like dodging a bullet [Link] Is this man dying 'free', or has he just been brainwashed to the point he's willing to die for no reason? Of course Americans often seem more all or nothing though. With the vaccine here, I'd say 99% of people seem very reasonable and balanced with regard to it and that take up will broadly relate to the trajectory of the virus. Edited by BlueJay (06 Feb 2022 10.11pm) I think these, and similar contributions, can be summarised more simply than this. They are based on selfishness. They concentrate on what's good, or acceptable, to the individual, and not what's good or necessary for society as a whole. Thus, as an example, why do we need to vaccinate the young, when they are known not to suffer anything more than a mild disease? When the reality is that an infected child can infect other children who can then infect their granny and granddad, without anyone realising it. For them, it's all about me and my personal freedom to decide what's best for me. That, in a pandemic, isn't good enough.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 06 Feb 22 11.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
I certainly see how most have reached the end of their tether in terms of the restrictions, which were certainly extreme. For what it's worth, with the massive sacrifices made while apparently those issuing these edicts were living it up, I'm not sure that people will be all that eager to pay much attention to restrictions if ever asked again in future. I hope you are right. I was at least relieved that my fears that these restrictions wouldn't be walked back proved unproven.....though perhaps it took a significant downturn in the mildness of the virus to achieve that.....plus Johnson's need to appeal to his base as the 'party gate' scandal revved up. Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Feb 2022 11.22pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Teddy Eagle 06 Feb 22 11.23pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I think these, and similar contributions, can be summarised more simply than this. They are based on selfishness. They concentrate on what's good, or acceptable, to the individual, and not what's good or necessary for society as a whole. Thus, as an example, why do we need to vaccinate the young, when they are known not to suffer anything more than a mild disease? When the reality is that an infected child can infect other children who can then infect their granny and granddad, without anyone realising it. For them, it's all about me and my personal freedom to decide what's best for me. That, in a pandemic, isn't good enough. In all honesty I got vaccinated for selfish reasons. Expecting to catch this at some stage I wanted a way to make it as easy as possible. Did this help anyone else? If so then good but it wasn’t my motivation.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 06 Feb 22 11.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I think these, and similar contributions, can be summarised more simply than this. They are based on selfishness. They concentrate on what's good, or acceptable, to the individual, and not what's good or necessary for society as a whole. Thus, as an example, why do we need to vaccinate the young, when they are known not to suffer anything more than a mild disease? When the reality is that an infected child can infect other children who can then infect their granny and granddad, without anyone realising it. For them, it's all about me and my personal freedom to decide what's best for me. That, in a pandemic, isn't good enough. Sounds more like what you considered lowered your personal risk most was your foremost concern. I very much doubt anyone whose read your posts over time was in any doubt of that. I have some sympathy with the fear of infection and during the early and mid days of the pandemic there was sense in limiting contact...if agreed to....between the vulnerable and a limited number....still that was no guarantee of no transmission but reasonable precautions. We did this ourselves with my partner's fully vaccinated father. However he knew that no one in our household would take the vaccinations and when we both caught covid he stayed away for two weeks as we isolated.....These were all adult risk assessments that we all agreed to. However extending that to vaccinating the healthy and young people against vaccines they had no real danger from.....Not for me.....that's against all previous medical practice....and indeed, that was the initial medical judgement and they had to be told to reconsider upon other criteria. If people wanted it outside the 'at risk' category, sure an adult can make that decision but that's not what happened and many were manipulated into taking them under basic threat of losing their job. My children's immune systems seem to be healthy and in terms of airborne viruses that are highly unlikely to kill them like the flu and covid I would much rather their system learnt naturally as it was ever thus. They won't be taking any covid vaccines. Edited by Stirlingsays (06 Feb 2022 11.42pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 06 Feb 22 11.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
In all honesty I got vaccinated for selfish reasons. Expecting to catch this at some stage I wanted a way to make it as easy as possible. Did this help anyone else? If so then good but it wasn’t my motivation. How it should be in a free society.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 07 Feb 22 11.49am | |
---|---|
Russell Brand on an censorship example over this whole area.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 07 Feb 22 12.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Teddy Eagle
In all honesty I got vaccinated for selfish reasons. Expecting to catch this at some stage I wanted a way to make it as easy as possible. Did this help anyone else? If so then good but it wasn’t my motivation. That's fine in my book. You got vaccinated and that's what matters. It's those who decided not to when all the public health advice was that they should, who concern me.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.