To want limits to immigration is not hate speech or even that nationalist. I'm not at all interested in flags. However, I don't want any more Somalis moving to Britain. I don't believe they are all backward barbarians and can see how that could be described as hate speech.
I will be explicit about my reasoning on Somalia and indeed most non-EU immigration: they add nothing to the country (unless they have specific job skills we require) and are likely to be a burden to the state and ultimately me - the tax payer.
I have also stated before that I believe many elements of the Islamic faith are not compatible with very cherished, and hard-won, Western European values. I also do not see much evidence that integration has worked at all.
I am not right wing at all. In fact, there is absolutely no way I would ever vote Tory and I am active in my trade union.
I just can't agree with this 'everyone is alright', 'the more diversity the better', post-colonial guilt narrative.
I'm not talking about raising the draw bridge. Perhaps proper border controls and much better visa and immigration checks would be my starting point. And yes, I would deport illegal immigrants - I just don't see them as my, or your, problem. I apologise for my lack of charity.

yet all everyone is doing is slating the deal.

Lots got what they voted for.

and lots didn't but more importantly what incentive would the EU have to give us a good free trade deal if we're stuck in a customs union and unable to leave voluntarily? The deal is pants.

The vote was very close.
2% difference.
So why should the deal be flat out leave and stuff it.
Surely the deal should also factor in the wants of the remainers.
Just because leave won it doesnt mean that remainers have to be totally blown out.
That would be undemocratic even though there was a winner.