This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 31 Jan 22 9.08pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pembroke
I stated it was not law. What you refer to are measures by trusts not government. There are exemptions. My entry into the NHS was not dependant on one vaccination. I am vaccinated v hepatitis, to protect myself not wider society. I made my decisions not Government, and have made decisions not to be vaccinated against flu where I am v covid, diphtheria, hepatitis etc. It should be pointed out you cannot compare hepatitis vaccination to covid. The risk profiles are different. Hepatitis is life altering across all age groups, health conditions v covid which will widely not be. It a spectacularly woeful parralel. I am also aware that there is a huge effort being made to reassure, educate and explain .. Is there? There has been a huge effort to bully and coerce people into something having something they do not want, and without anything like universal support of the care and medical sector. Peoples body autonomy and right to freedom of choice could always been respected. The uptake was vast. 100% coverage was never achievable, its myth, lies, vaccination is not covids silver bullet and the bullying, the distress caused and sad sacking of thousands of valuable responsible care staff was not necessary. The politicians responsible both left and right should hang their heads in shame. I never said it was law either, only a condition of employment. The current mandate is, I think, not a law either. It is a NHS requirement being implemented by the Trusts. Whether a Hep vaccine and the Covid one are directly comparable is a matter of opinion, but they are both recommended vaccines. Following the recommendations of experts seems sensible to me. Deciding not to be vaccinated against flu, for which herd immunity has been established, really isn't a good comparison. I don't think anyone has said it's anything other than a personal choice How the efforts being made to get the unvaccinated, vaccinated is described depends on your viewpoint. I am at one with the RCN etc in that I don't believe it ought to be mandatory, but that every effort needs to be made to get the waverers on board. If anyone feels so strongly that their personal decisions over their body outweigh everything else then they appear to have made a poor career choice to me. Nevertheless, they ought not just be dismissed as that wasn't made a condition when they joined. Redeployment seems a better outcome. The myths around the vaccination are all spread by the anti-vax movement, which has done immense amounts of harm and caused many deaths that could, and should, have been avoided.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 31 Jan 22 9.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
To quote you at 6.52pm, 'People now feel sorry for those who refuse, rather than see them as unwise, uneducated or selfish.' You are dishonest. Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Jan 2022 8.16pm) I have searched for that quote, to check its context, but cannot find it. There is a post at 6.52 pm but not from me. In any event I suggest it is read again, slowly and carefully. That's not me suggesting that I believe anyone is uneducated. It's me suggesting that anyone who does feel like that has now started to feel sorry for them, presumably in the context of them gaining sympathy as a result of vaccinations becoming mandatory. I certainly believe those who refuse vaccination to be unwise, and many to be selfish, but couldn't say whether they were educated, or not. That though wouldn't stop others making such a comment.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 01 Feb 22 1.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I have searched for that quote, to check its context, but cannot find it. There is a post at 6.52 pm but not from me. In any event I suggest it is read again, slowly and carefully. That's not me suggesting that I believe anyone is uneducated. It's me suggesting that anyone who does feel like that has now started to feel sorry for them, presumably in the context of them gaining sympathy as a result of vaccinations becoming mandatory. I certainly believe those who refuse vaccination to be unwise, and many to be selfish, but couldn't say whether they were educated, or not. That though wouldn't stop others making such a comment. The post at 6:52 is from me replying to your post. Even though your post is clearly within it I should have stated your post of 5.28pm....which apparently you couldn't remember or find. You are quite unbelievable....it's pathological dishonesty. Even at this stage of life you should seek help. Edited by Stirlingsays (01 Feb 2022 1.51am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 01 Feb 22 4.10am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I never said it was law either, only a condition of employment. The current mandate is, I think, not a law either. It is a NHS requirement being implemented by the Trusts. Whether a Hep vaccine and the Covid one are directly comparable is a matter of opinion, but they are both recommended vaccines. Following the recommendations of experts seems sensible to me. Deciding not to be vaccinated against flu, for which herd immunity has been established, really isn't a good comparison. I don't think anyone has said it's anything other than a personal choice How the efforts being made to get the unvaccinated, vaccinated is described depends on your viewpoint. I am at one with the RCN etc in that I don't believe it ought to be mandatory, but that every effort needs to be made to get the waverers on board. If anyone feels so strongly that their personal decisions over their body outweigh everything else then they appear to have made a poor career choice to me. Nevertheless, they ought not just be dismissed as that wasn't made a condition when they joined. Redeployment seems a better outcome. The myths around the vaccination are all spread by the anti-vax movement, which has done immense amounts of harm and caused many deaths that could, and should, have been avoided. Herd immunity has been established for covid. The office for National Statistics estimate that in England 98.0% of the adult population (95% credible interval: 97.6% to 98.3%) would have tested positive for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the week beginning 3 January 2022. The picture is similar for the rest of the UK. Despite irrational denials from you that everyone won't catch it the reality is that covid is now endemic. If someone lives long enough they will catch this, regardless of vaccine status, just as they will catch the common cold. The truth of the matter is that covid has long since spread and that the vast majority have antibodies yet you are still married to a past narrative of fear mongering and supporting punishments for people. You are the one spreading myths. You are the one who has supported coercion, something which has forced people to choose between their livelihoods and their preferences. You are the person who has suggested that people be ostracized. Edited by Stirlingsays (01 Feb 2022 4.16am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 01 Feb 22 8.12am | |
---|---|
This fraught interaction clearly needs its own background music for maximum effect [Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
ASCPFC Pro-Cathedral/caravan park 01 Feb 22 8.19am | |
---|---|
I find myself constantly putting on mask, out of habit now.
Red and Blue Army! |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 01 Feb 22 8.36am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
I find myself constantly putting on mask, out of habit now. So do I. Primarily when I'm tempted to read this thread. No eye or air holes of course. Though all semi jokes aside, a perk in this weather is that a mask keeps your face warm! I still wear a decent mask in supermarkets and public transport for the sake of the elderly and vulnerable but that's about it. It likely won't be long before even those who have endeavored to dodge covid Matrix style have come into contact with it, so I suppose down the line at least everyone will essentially know how the virus impacts them, which is the main unknown and concern for many of those most at risk. That and people in those risk groups 'should' certainly be vaccinated anyway, so that is likely to set outcome substantially in their favour when they first encounter it. Edited by BlueJay (01 Feb 2022 8.56am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Pembroke Bristol 01 Feb 22 9.53am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I never said it was law either, only a condition of employment. The current mandate is, I think, not a law either. It is a NHS requirement being implemented by the Trusts. Whether a Hep vaccine and the Covid one are directly comparable is a matter of opinion, but they are both recommended vaccines. Following the recommendations of experts seems sensible to me. Deciding not to be vaccinated against flu, for which herd immunity has been established, really isn't a good comparison. I don't think anyone has said it's anything other than a personal choice How the efforts being made to get the unvaccinated, vaccinated is described depends on your viewpoint. I am at one with the RCN etc in that I don't believe it ought to be mandatory, but that every effort needs to be made to get the waverers on board. If anyone feels so strongly that their personal decisions over their body outweigh everything else then they appear to have made a poor career choice to me. Nevertheless, they ought not just be dismissed as that wasn't made a condition when they joined. Redeployment seems a better outcome. The myths around the vaccination are all spread by the anti-vax movement, which has done immense amounts of harm and caused many deaths that could, and should, have been avoided. Your idea of poor choice is irrelevant. Care is patient led. Body autonomy is law, it is in the mental capacity act, in the equlality act. Whether a Hep vaccine and the Covid one are directly comparable is a matter of opinion ... Sorry its a medical fact. The profiles are entirely different. Reccommended is not mandatory .. And that was a major point. Government backed by Labour ignored law and the caring sectors. The government backed by Labour used the care sector as an experiment to see if they could get a measure into the NHS. Humans in the care sector had less worth than the humans in the NHS. Government backed by Labour ignored the implcations of sacking tens of thousands of staff in the care sector, and put individuals at more risk. Shame on them.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 01 Feb 22 9.56am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
The post at 6:52 is from me replying to your post. Even though your post is clearly within it I should have stated your post of 5.28pm....which apparently you couldn't remember or find. You are quite unbelievable....it's pathological dishonesty. Even at this stage of life you should seek help. Edited by Stirlingsays (01 Feb 2022 1.51am) With that level of abuse I see no reason why I should dignify it with a reply, let alone a polite one. But I will try. I went looking for posts from me at 6.52. I didn't re-read anything else, either from me or anyone else. Why would I? I don't have endless time, or the interest, to read things again just for fun. I went back a week and found none. I assumed the allegation had at least one accurate element in that it correctly quoted the time. That it did not is not my responsibility. In the event it confirmed the explanation given in my previous reply. That this wasn't me accusing anyone of being uneducated. This was me suggesting that people in general were now showing some sympathy for the unvaccinated health care workers as a result of them being put under pressure, when they might previously have had negative opinions. Some of which I suggested. Not mine. Theirs. That those with an agenda similar to a rabid attack dog are determined to search for any word they can find, take it out of context and build a whole mountain range of abuse from it, isn't my responsibility. Pathetic personal attacks which add nothing to the debate are a waste of everyone's time.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 01 Feb 22 10.32am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Herd immunity has been established for covid. The office for National Statistics estimate that in England 98.0% of the adult population (95% credible interval: 97.6% to 98.3%) would have tested positive for antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the week beginning 3 January 2022. The picture is similar for the rest of the UK. Despite irrational denials from you that everyone won't catch it the reality is that covid is now endemic. If someone lives long enough they will catch this, regardless of vaccine status, just as they will catch the common cold. The truth of the matter is that covid has long since spread and that the vast majority have antibodies yet you are still married to a past narrative of fear mongering and supporting punishments for people. You are the one spreading myths. You are the one who has supported coercion, something which has forced people to choose between their livelihoods and their preferences. You are the person who has suggested that people be ostracized. Edited by Stirlingsays (01 Feb 2022 4.16am) That's a pretty wild, and unsubstantiated claim. The link from the ONS does not mention herd immunity at all. It is only about the presence of antibodies, which are there in the vast majority of us as a result of the vaccinations we have had. I am not an expert but so far as I understand things, whilst having a large % of people with antibodies is a good sign it doesn't equal herd immunity. We know people get infected more than once. We know the virus mutates. We know immunity fades. Having some antibodies doesn't mean you have enough to protect. Try reading this:- [Link] It is to be hoped that we are on the way to Covid becoming endemic, but we aren't there yet. Omicron has proved, as predicted, less harmful but another variant may not be. We must remain cautious. The brakes are off again, so enjoy the relaxation but the need to stay on top of the vaccination programme is every bit as important now as before. I blanch with despair at some of the attitudes I encounter over vaccination in general. Only today I read that we face a measles crisis again, due to vaccine scepticism. Scepticism promoted by misinformation. We need to ensure vaccination is an accepted, normal, regular life event for all. Trusted and uncontroversial. So when the next pandemic arrives we all just get on with it. People should not even be thinking about "preferences". There is no choice between life or death. This ought to be a "no-brainer" for everyone. It's not a choice between jam or marmalade. Those who endlessly bang-on about personal freedom as though it is the most essential aspect of life, are really not free at all. They are hog-tied to an ideology without any real meaning, or value, which serves nothing other than their selfishness.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 01 Feb 22 10.44am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Pembroke
Your idea of poor choice is irrelevant. Care is patient led. Body autonomy is law, it is in the mental capacity act, in the equlality act. Whether a Hep vaccine and the Covid one are directly comparable is a matter of opinion ... Sorry its a medical fact. The profiles are entirely different. Reccommended is not mandatory .. And that was a major point. Government backed by Labour ignored law and the caring sectors. The government backed by Labour used the care sector as an experiment to see if they could get a measure into the NHS. Humans in the care sector had less worth than the humans in the NHS. Government backed by Labour ignored the implcations of sacking tens of thousands of staff in the care sector, and put individuals at more risk. Shame on them. Of course care is patient led. That's the whole point. The question is what is most important? The rights of the patient, or the rights of the carer? If they conflict, which trumps the other? These are questions which arise in many situations, for which perfect resolutions don't exist. I recognise not all vaccines are identical in the way they are constructed, or in their effectiveness. It is nonetheless true that they all involve someone accepting an injection to protect them against a disease. If you are prepared to co-operate for one, why not for another? To repeat. I didn't think making them mandatory was wise. Whether legal is above my pay grade. I don't think anyone ignored the implications of sacking thousands. I don't think it was actually ever contemplated, but this was a move to try to increase the uptake. One I suspect backfired.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 01 Feb 22 10.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That's a pretty wild, and unsubstantiated claim. The link from the ONS does not mention herd immunity at all. It is only about the presence of antibodies, which are there in the vast majority of us as a result of the vaccinations we have had. I am not an expert but so far as I understand things, whilst having a large % of people with antibodies is a good sign it doesn't equal herd immunity. We know people get infected more than once. We know the virus mutates. We know immunity fades. Having some antibodies doesn't mean you have enough to protect. Try reading this:- [Link] It is to be hoped that we are on the way to Covid becoming endemic, but we aren't there yet. Omicron has proved, as predicted, less harmful but another variant may not be. We must remain cautious. The brakes are off again, so enjoy the relaxation but the need to stay on top of the vaccination programme is every bit as important now as before. I blanch with despair at some of the attitudes I encounter over vaccination in general. Only today I read that we face a measles crisis again, due to vaccine scepticism. Scepticism promoted by misinformation. We need to ensure vaccination is an accepted, normal, regular life event for all. Trusted and uncontroversial. So when the next pandemic arrives we all just get on with it. People should not even be thinking about "preferences". There is no choice between life or death. This ought to be a "no-brainer" for everyone. It's not a choice between jam or marmalade. Those who endlessly bang-on about personal freedom as though it is the most essential aspect of life, are really not free at all. They are hog-tied to an ideology without any real meaning, or value, which serves nothing other than their selfishness. Did you even read the article you linked to? To quote, 'The original Sars-CoV-2 virus strain had a herd immunity threshold that was estimated at 60-75%. But more recent and more transmissible variants, such as Delta and Omicron, likely have thresholds upwards of 80-90% – and that’s assuming everyone who has been vaccinated or previously infected is fully protected against future infection.' I just showed you that we are at near 100 percent with antibodies. I don't know how much more 'herd immunity' something can get. The government has removed all previous restrictions. When are you going to get that into your head. Regardless of vaccine status people will continually get reinfected. How they deal with that reality will be their personal choice, just as it is and was for the over fifties with flu....Personal choice is as it should be. These authors make warning claims that read pretty similar to claims made about Omicron previously that haven't panned out and thank god our own government didn't listen to....because they were wrong. Just like you are wrong. But hey, keep linking to the Guardian, Mr 'One nation conservative'. Edited by Stirlingsays (01 Feb 2022 10.54am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.