You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic
November 25 2024 11.26am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Coronavirus (LOCKED)

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 1134 of 1255 < 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 >

Topic Locked

Wisbech Eagle Flag Truro Cornwall 29 Jan 22 11.49am Send a Private Message to Wisbech Eagle Add Wisbech Eagle as a friend

Originally posted by Forest Hillbilly

I think that statement is unfair. A lot of people I know, myself included, would be willing to pay more, as we appreciate its value to society.
Things that have seen costs escalate include (but not restricted to ) advances in expensive treatments, massive costs of pharmaceuticals and an increasingly aged population.
And although a lot of people profess to want to pay more for the NHS, (significant)rises in taxes has never been a vote winner.

And the ?NHS has always (certainly in my lifetime) seen significant numbers of trainee nurses come from Africa. There are some associated problems with this, which arise from cultural differences, but also not having English as a first language (or at least not having a full and fluent grasp of the language) is slightly risky when it comes to dispensing drugs, and communicating with other medical professionals.

All the "international" nurses are fully qualified. They aren't students or trainees. They have to undergo a few months of adaptation before they get their PIN and can practise alone. I am not aware of the current numbers, or the breakdown between the various sources, but have some direct knowledge of one of the primary ones, which is the Philippines. We now recruit many nurses from there. All have to spend a huge amount of money on being trained for 5 years, with their families often incurring enormous debt to do so, in the expectation it will all be repaid by remittances once they get a job. They have to take their Board exams in Hong Kong as their own education system isn't trusted internationally. Their route to us is often via the Middle East and their hoped for final destination the USA. You will often only be aware of them if you have to go to hospital as they work very long hours in order to send money home, and have little time for socialising.

 


For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Stirlingsays Flag 29 Jan 22 12.29pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

'If you scare people enough, they will demand removal of freedom. This is the path to tyranny.' (Elon Musk)

And I can't really disagree with a word said by Mark Dolan here.

[Link]

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Ketteridge Flag Brighton 29 Jan 22 12.49pm Send a Private Message to Ketteridge Add Ketteridge as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

The scope of the NHS has massively expanded over time.....now it's like some kind of national pseudo religion.

Now it takes up nearly 40 percent of taxpayer spending.

The military spending is 2 percent.

Personally I don't really think any of this is realistic.


The 40% isn't of all taxpayer spending, the 40% figure is for government day to day spending but not all government spending. The day to day departmental spending is the budget for schools, hospitals, policing defense etc. and doesn’t include all the money the government spend pensions welfare etc. Just over half the of all money raised in taxes is accounted for by day to day spending and this include the spending on capital projects like building hospitals or roads. Explained in more detail here [Link] The increase is largely to clear covid backlog and pay for social care.
As a proportion of the GDP health spending has risen from 3% in 1958-59 to 7% now Table 1 here here [Link] . Which has doubled but then life expectancy has increased from 70 in 1960 to 81 in 2015, which has brought additional costs [Link]
In terms of health care spend we are pretty middle of the table for OECD countries [Link] so we don’t pay more than other developed countries particularly and we pay less then half what they pay in health care in the U.S . The relevant question is do we get a good service, International comparison of outcomes can be difficult because the methodology would need to take into account the circumstances and culture of the country so you can take this with a pinch of salt, especially as I’m not going to spend my Saturday drawing up a pro and cons of all methodologies . Uk is ranked 7th here [Link] and 16th here [Link] so probably not bad for the money we pay out.
The Defence figure you use is 2.2% of GDP , not 2.2% of Tax revenue or day to day Government spending. Tax revenue is about £800bn and Defence spending is £40bn so 5% of all tax revenue and 9%-10% of all day to day spending. Essential confusing the 2.2% and 40% is to confuse the overall income in household terms it is similar to comparing gross income and disposable income.


 


One supporter of hacking argued that without it "you will do away with the courage and pluck of the game, and I will be bound to bring over a lot of Frenchmen who would beat you with a week's practice -Blackheath secretary at first meeting of the F.A

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Stirlingsays Flag 29 Jan 22 1.17pm Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Ketteridge


The 40% isn't of all taxpayer spending, the 40% figure is for government day to day spending but not all government spending. The day to day departmental spending is the budget for schools, hospitals, policing defense etc. and doesn’t include all the money the government spend pensions welfare etc. Just over half the of all money raised in taxes is accounted for by day to day spending and this include the spending on capital projects like building hospitals or roads. Explained in more detail here [Link] The increase is largely to clear covid backlog and pay for social care.
As a proportion of the GDP health spending has risen from 3% in 1958-59 to 7% now Table 1 here here [Link] . Which has doubled but then life expectancy has increased from 70 in 1960 to 81 in 2015, which has brought additional costs [Link]
In terms of health care spend we are pretty middle of the table for OECD countries [Link] so we don’t pay more than other developed countries particularly and we pay less then half what they pay in health care in the U.S . The relevant question is do we get a good service, International comparison of outcomes can be difficult because the methodology would need to take into account the circumstances and culture of the country so you can take this with a pinch of salt, especially as I’m not going to spend my Saturday drawing up a pro and cons of all methodologies . Uk is ranked 7th here [Link] and 16th here [Link] so probably not bad for the money we pay out.
The Defence figure you use is 2.2% of GDP , not 2.2% of Tax revenue or day to day Government spending. Tax revenue is about £800bn and Defence spending is £40bn so 5% of all tax revenue and 9%-10% of all day to day spending. Essential confusing the 2.2% and 40% is to confuse the overall income in household terms it is similar to comparing gross income and disposable income.


That is a lot of work.

Ok, I'll change that to 40 percent of government day to day spending.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 30 Jan 22 9.50am

‘I will die free’: Unvaccinated Burke County man denied kidney transplant by hospital - [Link]


Another myth muncher who's lost the plot and makes health assessments and choices geared towards shuffling off this mortal coil. Ironic that the bloke think its all about 'ma freedom' when he's actually been brainwashed into pointlessly signing his own death warrant. Being offered a transplant is a privilege, and due to the required immunosuppressant drugs its not much to ask that he appreciates that and takes very minimal efforts to maximise a positive outcome. Though of course, if he won't someone else will.

Edited by BlueJay (30 Jan 2022 10.08am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
Ketteridge Flag Brighton 30 Jan 22 2.34pm Send a Private Message to Ketteridge Add Ketteridge as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

That is a lot of work.

Ok, I'll change that to 40 percent of government day to day spending.



Not really took about 5 or 6 google searches to work out that you had doubled NHS budget and that NHS spending has been pretty much level for last 10 years.
It was also fairly simple to work out you claim that we spend £20 on the NHS for every £1 we spend on Defence was well off the mark as it is closer to £3 for the NHS for every £1 on defence. Glad I could help you out.


Edited by Ketteridge (30 Jan 2022 2.36pm)

 


One supporter of hacking argued that without it "you will do away with the courage and pluck of the game, and I will be bound to bring over a lot of Frenchmen who would beat you with a week's practice -Blackheath secretary at first meeting of the F.A

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
BlueJay Flag UK 31 Jan 22 8.35am

Originally posted by BlueJay

I'm not convinced this new rule (where you must be 'double vaccinated' - which seems a bit odd anyway) will be actioned on April 1st really. It seems too late in the day to make much difference. They should've either brought this in a year ago or never.

To my mind, still nudging towards the above [Link]

Will soon see.

Edited by BlueJay (31 Jan 2022 8.49am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post
Stirlingsays Flag 31 Jan 22 8.47am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

The vaccine mandate for the NHS is anti freedom and and besides its practical irrationality was little more than state actioned extortion and dirty tactics.

I'm proud to say I came out strongly against this right from the start - A state should not behave in this way. If they want to put vaccination requirements into new starting staff contracts then that...while I think is self harming....is at least fair.

That they are now likely to drop the mandates is only common sense. Those who were coerced into actions they didn't want have a right to feel pretty angry and much less trusting in future.

Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Jan 2022 8.49am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Stirlingsays Flag 31 Jan 22 8.57am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Ketteridge

Not really took about 5 or 6 google searches to work out that you had doubled NHS budget and that NHS spending has been pretty much level for last 10 years.
It was also fairly simple to work out you claim that we spend £20 on the NHS for every £1 we spend on Defence was well off the mark as it is closer to £3 for the NHS for every £1 on defence. Glad I could help you out.

Edited by Ketteridge (30 Jan 2022 2.36pm)

Personally I regard your figures as little more than statistical manipulation. The reality is that the current spending pathway is unrealistic versus an aging population and automation is badly needed.

Regardless of that you can take your sneering attitude where the sun don't shine.

Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Jan 2022 8.59am)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Pembroke Flag Bristol 31 Jan 22 10.34am Send a Private Message to Pembroke Add Pembroke as a friend

Originally posted by Stirlingsays

The vaccine mandate for the NHS is anti freedom and and besides its practical irrationality was little more than state actioned extortion and dirty tactics.

I'm proud to say I came out strongly against this right from the start - A state should not behave in this way. If they want to put vaccination requirements into new starting staff contracts then that...while I think is self harming....is at least fair.

That they are now likely to drop the mandates is only common sense. Those who were coerced into actions they didn't want have a right to feel pretty angry and much less trusting in future.

Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Jan 2022 8.49am)

This NHS worker was wholly against this.

Hopefully the Labour party will be as vocal as they were supporting mandatory vaccination supporting the thousands of working-class care workers who lost their jobs.

The government consultation highlighted mass opposition to mandatory vaccination in care and the NHS, Royal colleges opposed British medical journal, the homecare association, Unions were all opposed. There was no risk assessment of the impact of losing tens and tens of thousands of staff.

The Tories and Labour exposed themselves here as both being as thick as s***. Good people in care and the NHS have been treated and bullied like disposable worthless commodities.


Edited by Pembroke (31 Jan 2022 10.35am)

Edited by Pembroke (31 Jan 2022 10.35am)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Stirlingsays Flag 31 Jan 22 10.39am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

Originally posted by Pembroke

This NHS worker was wholly against this.

Hopefully the Labour party will be as vocal as they were supporting mandatory vaccination supporting the thousands of working-class care workers who lost their jobs.

The government consultation highlighted mass opposition to mandatory vaccination in care and the NHS, Royal colleges opposed British medical journal, the homecare association, Unions were all opposed. There was no risk assessment of the impact of losing tens and tens of thousands of staff.

The Tories and Labour exposed themselves here as both being as thick as s***. Good people in care and the NHS have been treated and bullied like disposable worthless commodities.


Edited by Pembroke (31 Jan 2022 10.35am)

Edited by Pembroke (31 Jan 2022 10.35am)

I tip my hat and I fully concur.

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post
Stirlingsays Flag 31 Jan 22 11.38am Send a Private Message to Stirlingsays Holmesdale Online Elite Member Add Stirlingsays as a friend

I was told on here months ago that vaccination reduced transmission over natural immunity....I replied that this data only came from drug companies. Well, not only has recent data proven that natural immunity is on par if not slightly better but now....according to this clip, according to government data, in the last four weeks if you are vaccinated you are more likely to have had covid...and thus transmit than if you weren't vaccinated.

[Link]

Edited by Stirlingsays (31 Jan 2022 12.21pm)

 


'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post

Topic Locked

Page 1134 of 1255 < 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Topic