This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 23 Jan 22 11.42am | |
---|---|
An interesting article. I don't think the future is going to be very kind to the lockdown enthusiasts. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Jan 2022 11.43am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Eaglecoops CR3 23 Jan 22 12.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
An interesting article. I don't think the future is going to be very kind to the lockdown enthusiasts. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Jan 2022 11.43am) I was always rather annoyed that the female doctor from SA was ridiculed by the British Authorities for no other reason than she didn’t have as many letters after her name than that idiot Ferguson and to a slightly lesser extent Whitty.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 23 Jan 22 1.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
I was always rather annoyed that the female doctor from SA was ridiculed by the British Authorities for no other reason than she didn’t have as many letters after her name than that idiot Ferguson and to a slightly lesser extent Whitty.
In two years, when you look at the national death average since the pandemic began 128000 people have died over the average. While I suspect that a large percentage of them were from Covid (with other contributory factors) I also suspect that the increase over the average was from other causes related to diverting medical priorities and the effects of lockdown itself. While I always agreed that the aged and vulnerable were safeguarded as best we could I've never changed my opinion that this whole episode has been an incredible economic over-reaction....we spent more than WW2 on this....that spending isn't going to just go away and we are already feeling the effects. The state should not be engaged in bahaviour manipulation via selective information and fear nor should it be engaged in the omission and censoring of alternative opinions.....and there is never a defense for coercion in free societies. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Jan 2022 1.25pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Jimenez SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 23 Jan 22 1.20pm | |
---|---|
Anyone else still buying into this scam?
Pro USA & Israel |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 23 Jan 22 4.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
In two years, when you look at the national death average since the pandemic began 128000 people have died over the average. While I suspect that a large percentage of them were from Covid (with other contributory factors) I also suspect that the increase over the average was from other causes related to diverting medical priorities and the effects of lockdown itself. While I always agreed that the aged and vulnerable were safeguarded as best we could I've never changed my opinion that this whole episode has been an incredible economic over-reaction....we spent more than WW2 on this....that spending isn't going to just go away and we are already feeling the effects. The state should not be engaged in bahaviour manipulation via selective information and fear nor should it be engaged in the omission and censoring of alternative opinions.....and there is never a defense for coercion in free societies. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Jan 2022 1.25pm) This I agree with, and all the lockdowns and restrictions were too long. Also, see how this Autumn 2021 we didn’t have the problems of infection Europe had because we opened up earlier in spring/summer 2021. The problem with shielding the elderly and vulnerable is that there’s so many, or so many households with at least one in, who’ll therefore never be able to go out for the most part of 24 months. This isn’t helped by however many who’ve never given a sh1te about their own health. Remember my obesity idea if you made no effort to lose weight? Probably not what a responsible society should do, but here we are. You can’t get everyone healthy instantly because of covid as some would like and shout opposing any restrictions, but also many haven’t done anything to get healthier since March 2020 either. What ever changes on this in the west now? So many sloths. Predictably many tv and radio presenters are claiming the government should face criticism for raising fear levels, yet this is what they were doing by either following the government’s memo or going after viewers/listeners and advertising. Hopefully these hypocrites will be exposed to enough people. Fat chance of that. Edited by Rudi Hedman (23 Jan 2022 5.13pm)
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 23 Jan 22 7.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
In two years, when you look at the national death average since the pandemic began 128000 people have died over the average. While I suspect that a large percentage of them were from Covid (with other contributory factors) I also suspect that the increase over the average was from other causes related to diverting medical priorities and the effects of lockdown itself. While I always agreed that the aged and vulnerable were safeguarded as best we could I've never changed my opinion that this whole episode has been an incredible economic over-reaction....we spent more than WW2 on this....that spending isn't going to just go away and we are already feeling the effects. The state should not be engaged in bahaviour manipulation via selective information and fear nor should it be engaged in the omission and censoring of alternative opinions.....and there is never a defense for coercion in free societies. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Jan 2022 1.25pm) The point is without lockdowns, advice, shielding and now the vaccine and booster how many may have died. Hospitals were at 40k admissions and in real days that's 300% more than normal. If we could get doc brown to take us back 2 years one of us would be right. As it is impossible its hard for either of us to be wrong.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 24 Jan 22 8.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
The point is without lockdowns, advice, shielding and now the vaccine and booster how many may have died. Hospitals were at 40k admissions and in real days that's 300% more than normal. If we could get doc brown to take us back 2 years one of us would be right. As it is impossible its hard for either of us to be wrong. If you think the money that was spent against Covid was justified I'm certainly not going to convince you otherwise. I would certainly say that lockdowns as a policy....though there's an argument for the first one.....were bad policy for several different reasons but it's beating a dead horse....as kind of like you say it's in the past....an argument that was lost in that initial week when Johnson...and most of Europe radically changed tack. But we are going to live with the economic consequences....and they are coming, energy and food prices are going to rocket.....If our western leaders decide on a pointless war with Russia over Ukraine those energy bills will be even worse sooner. Am I annoyed that people went along with the media and government to the extent they did....nodded along to the propaganda believing all of it? Yeah, but like a lot about the modern world....I'm long since resigned to it. Edited by Stirlingsays (24 Jan 2022 8.15pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 24 Jan 22 8.11pm | |
---|---|
Dr John Campbell on recent CDC data proving....well what was always common sense, that natural immunity is no second class fixture compared to vaccination...and in fact is slightly better. All the media and government waddle presenting the 'unvaccinated' as some kind of unacceptable risk, as some kind of 'unclean' has been nothing but propaganda designed to manipulate attitudes and behaviour. This guy certainly cares far more about the truth than our media does.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 25 Jan 22 6.06am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
An interesting article. I don't think the future is going to be very kind to the lockdown enthusiasts. Edited by Stirlingsays (23 Jan 2022 11.43am) Just read your link - very interesting!
Edited by The Dolphin (25 Jan 2022 6.07am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 25 Jan 22 6.17am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
Just read your link - very interesting!
Edited by The Dolphin (25 Jan 2022 6.07am) Fully agree. These guys were a vital part of the process that led the government onto lockdowns and the restrictions that fatally damaged businesses and people's lives. I think we all agree that precautions were needed but the manipulation and punishments that were green lit caused real damage. I'm not someone who makes a big deal of parties at number ten nor calls for a PM change but the fact that people having picnics in parks were told to go home and even people in their gardens told to go back in...not to mention those restrictions around seeing the terminally ill.....all that feeds into a discontent over what happened. Bad projections fed into bad policy. Edited by Stirlingsays (25 Jan 2022 6.17am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 25 Jan 22 10.07am | |
---|---|
I urge everyone, and especially the reluctant vaxxers, to watch this video report by Clive Myrie. It puts a lot of things into perspective and destroys a few myths:- Co-incidentally I was able to watch a presentation yesterday given by the RCN lead on countering anti-vaccination misinformation. Much of what was said chimed with many of the points I have already made, and are reflected in the above video. However, one thing was new to me. According to the WHO the biggest potential contributor to better health, and less early mortality, around the world, is the provision of safe drinking water. The second is to ensure that those who can be vaccinated, are vaccinated. Not to protect them as individuals but mainly to establish herd immunity in which the viruses can no longer do damage. Which is why those who refuse are not just exercising a personal choice. They are failing the rest of us through their selfishness.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 25 Jan 22 10.10am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Dr John Campbell on recent CDC data proving....well what was always common sense, that natural immunity is no second class fixture compared to vaccination...and in fact is slightly better. All the media and government waddle presenting the 'unvaccinated' as some kind of unacceptable risk, as some kind of 'unclean' has been nothing but propaganda designed to manipulate attitudes and behaviour. This guy certainly cares far more about the truth than our media does.
Papers taken as a whole I'd say that there are more unknowns about natural infection re: protection levels, but that if this paper ends up being the consensus it's clearly very good news. Logically it would seem that vaccination + natural infection (in that order) is pretty optimal.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.