No. You want to rerun the game because you lost. I choose not to rerun the game because it's already taken place with a definite outcome. Would you go running to the FA to rerun a match that Palace lost? Actually, you're just the kind of person who'd do exactly that if you could.

That's only if May's pathetic deal gets approved by Parliament......

Right now I'd take no deal - that should have been our starting point in negotiations. May was an idiot for blinking first.

Edited by masonic_palace (29 Nov 2018 3.12pm)

404 Signature Not Found

What really angers me about May's performance and this pathetic excuse of a 'deal' is that she went into the negotiations and seemingly deliberately pissed away what was in fact a very strong bargaining position. As you said, she blinked first and too soon. Useless.

Because you will never accept the outcome unless it’s remain.

Not a single person backing a peoples vote is anything other than a staunch remainer. That’s why it shouldn’t even be called a “people’s vote” because it masks the true intention of it. Which is to vote again on whether to leave or remain.

Leavers don’t want a second vote. They voted to leave. Why shouldn’t they have that implemented? It’s called democracy whatever way you wanna spin it. Attempting to re run the whole thing because you don’t like the result is just a complete insult, not only to democracy, but to the people partaking in it.

Farage literally got laughed at when he suggested there should be another vote when it looked like remain would win by a small margin. Why is it no longer a joke because it’s the other way around? D’you not think leavers could’ve got a whole load of subjective polling to support a case for a second vote? Do you think the same centrists & remainers pushing for a so called people’s vote would’ve granted leave another vote if the shoe was on the other foot? Would’ve you? The truth is no, of course you wouldn’t. But it’s not your side it’s happening to. So who gives a toss eh?

In response to “what’s the big deal with a second vote?”. Do you not remember the toxicity of the first one? Times that by about 10,000 with a side order of genuine potential of civil disobedience. And you have your answer.

Why don’t we have a referendum on whether or not we have a second referendum? And if you lose that we can just claim they were all hoodwinked racists again, and have a second referendum on that too. Just keep having referendums, over and over again. Eventually fatigue will kick in and the foolish public will do as they’re told.

We're the Arthur over ere!

That maybe why shes an EX

Im a remainer and dont see a re vote as fair so i dont agree with steeleye.
I was ok with what we had and where we were but clearly a majority werent.
What i do see is that the present 'deal' is to get the ball rolling.
It was never going to be done in two years total.
Lets all calm down and just wait.
The way i see it is that in a divorce or split there are ends to be tied but they are never instant. They can take years with negotiations and middle ground to be met on.
The start point on choosing which immigrants to accept has been made.
That was a biggy in a lot of leavers reasoning.
The finance was always going to have to be paid up.
Think about if you split up. You only get chased for ever until a settlement is made.
One way or another the eu woukd have got their dough. Whether through taxes on import and export or threats on visas etc. They would have got it back.
Time is now needed to go forward with this.
Im totally pissed off about it but am a pragmatist
And hope it doesnt go pear shaped as me and mine will be affected if it does.
Good luck to the uk going forwards.