This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Hrolf The Ganger 26 May 21 5.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
He may be ‘odious’ and ‘bitter’ but he’s made a lot of very serious allegations about the PM and Hancock, a lot of which looked like they can be backed up, which means both of them have some very serious questions to answer. If true, they are both directly responsible for tens of thousands of people dying unnecessarily. No. Covid 19 is responsible. They had to make the tough decisions. Funny how suddenly he is the Left's friend when last year the likes of you wanted him sacked and thrown to the wolves. The Left really has no principles whatsoever does it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 26 May 21 5.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
No. Covid 19 is responsible. They had to make the tough decisions. Funny how suddenly he is the Left's friend when last year the likes of you wanted him sacked and thrown to the wolves. The Left really has no principles whatsoever does it. Whereas you seem to wish - in a highly principled way - to turn a blind eye. Is that how you feel about corporate manslaughter too?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 26 May 21 5.34pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
No. Covid 19 is responsible. They had to make the tough decisions. Funny how suddenly he is the Left's friend when last year the likes of you wanted him sacked and thrown to the wolves. The Left really has no principles whatsoever does it. They made decisions (or shirked making them in Johnson’s case) which directly led to more people dying than was necessary. If I set fire to your house while you are sleeping is it me or the fire that kills you?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 26 May 21 5.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Whereas you seem to wish - in a highly principled way - to turn a blind eye. Is that how you feel about corporate manslaughter too? But that is his point. Last year Cummings was a liar now he must be believed. Before today's appearance some of the experts have already denied his claim about herd immunity. What we now need is someone to pick through the lies and denials and determine the truth. No one in the country will be surprised that the government failed to act swiftly and was certainly shambolic at the start. Don't forget Public Health England had a big part to play in this shambles. Corporate manslaughter is a serious charge that needs to be backed up. Edited by Badger11 (26 May 2021 5.38pm)
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 26 May 21 5.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
Whereas you seem to wish - in a highly principled way - to turn a blind eye. Is that how you feel about corporate manslaughter too? Corporate manslaughter ha ha.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 26 May 21 5.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mstrobez
Just out of interest, why is everyone losing their s*** over the notion that herd immunity was a "strategy"? Surely, herd immunity is not a strategy, merely an ultimate scientific reality in the vast majority of viruses. Isn't everyone in the world aiming for herd immunity one way or the other? Isn't herd immunity the precise purpose of vaccination? mmmm – technically accurate, but not contextually accurate. I would have thought was pretty obvious but never mind. Herd immunity in this context, back in March/April, was the strategy of 'letting it rip' through the populous as was. i.e. natural spread, no vaccination, no protection, just get the pox parties going and see what happens. Obviously, a terrible idea. And rightly and continuously being called out as so. So when you say 'why is everyone losing their s***', this is why. To your point, herd immunity will be the outcome of vaccination, yes, but the original strategy was herd immunity without vaccination, and with no proof at that time that people would even build up adequate antibodies naturally to achieve it. Obvious and important difference. Hence losing s***.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 26 May 21 5.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Badger11
But that is his point. Last year Cummings was a liar now he must be believed. Before today's appearance some of the experts have already denied his claim about herd immunity. What we now need is someone to pick through the lies and denials and determine the truth. No one in the country will be surprised that the government failed to act swiftly and was certainly shambolic at the start. Don't forget Public Health England had a big part to play in this shambles. Corporate manslaughter is a serious charge that needs to be backed up. Edited by Badger11 (26 May 2021 5.38pm) His allegation about Hancock sending positive patients back into care homes and lying about it is extremely serious and tantamount to corporate manslaughter. He’s definitely got some big questions to answer. I don’t think Johnson has ever set out to make a bad decision; I think he’s made bad decisions because he’s throughly unsuited to high office, especially in a time of crisis.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 26 May 21 5.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by cryrst
Corporate manslaughter ha ha. Isn't the debate around the percentage of those millions that could reasonably have been avoided, not a binary 'some' or 'none'. Things appear to have gone worse than they should have done due to a blonde spaffer doing what he does best and floundering around like a fat, aged golden retriever. And that's without the benefit of hindsight. People at the time were seemingly pushing back on decisions that were being made against the advisory consensus. You don't need hindsight to tell you that should have been done differently.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 26 May 21 5.46pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
His allegation about Hancock sending positive patients back into care homes and lying about it is extremely serious and tantamount to corporate manslaughter. He’s definitely got some big questions to answer. I don’t think Johnson has ever set out to make a bad decision; I think he’s made bad decisions because he’s throughly unsuited to high office, especially in a time of crisis. Indeed
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 26 May 21 5.58pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
His allegation about Hancock sending positive patients back into care homes and lying about it is extremely serious and tantamount to corporate manslaughter. He’s definitely got some big questions to answer. I don’t think Johnson has ever set out to make a bad decision; I think he’s made bad decisions because he’s throughly unsuited to high office, especially in a time of crisis. There were plenty of people in these meetings including experts and civil servants so at some point I assume we will hear from them as well as Hancock. As you say it is a serious allegation so let's wait for what others will say. Public Health England should not be left off the hook. That agency was set up exactly for this reason to plan and prepare for major health scares. Where was the plan and why no stores of PPE? Ultimately the buck stops with the government and Boris but in the end PHE was so incompetent that it was sidelined and is being abolished. We seemed to start to get a grip when SAGE was formed but even then I am not happy about keeping the airports open. There is lots to come out and plenty of blame to go around but before some of you reach for the tar and feathers lets hear from a few other people first who will either confirm or deny Cummings rather lurid remarks.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 26 May 21 6.00pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
mmmm – technically accurate, but not contextually accurate. I would have thought was pretty obvious but never mind. Herd immunity in this context, back in March/April, was the strategy of 'letting it rip' through the populous as was. i.e. natural spread, no vaccination, no protection, just get the pox parties going and see what happens. Obviously, a terrible idea. And rightly and continuously being called out as so. So when you say 'why is everyone losing their s***', this is why. To your point, herd immunity will be the outcome of vaccination, yes, but the original strategy was herd immunity without vaccination, and with no proof at that time that people would even build up adequate antibodies naturally to achieve it. Obvious and important difference. Hence losing s***. Disagree myself. I think time will show that it was the better longer play. Economically we are on the edge, with no room for reaction, and ripe for the taking for another virus. Edited by Stirlingsays (26 May 2021 6.03pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Badger11 Beckenham 26 May 21 6.07pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Disagree myself. I think time will show that it was the better longer play. Economically we are on the edge, with no room for reaction, and ripe for the taking for another virus. Edited by Stirlingsays (26 May 2021 6.02pm) Herd Immunity was the official policy of Sweden and there were plenty of experts in the media last year advocating we should follow them. I am not saying we should have done but with the benefit of hindsight the media and some politicians are now implying it was like genocide when it was actually a perfectly valid strategy that has been used before in other situations.
One more point |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.