This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
What's coming into Western Europe ?.People or men?
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Stirlingsays  14 Aug 21 6.21pm |
   |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
I’m really not. You doing panto now?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
Teddy Eagle  14 Aug 21 7.29pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
Refugees have an international right to asylum. There is literally nothing that says it has to be in the first ‘safe’ country they manage to get to. But we’re not talking about refugees. Asylum seekers have found asylum in the first safe country they get to. After that it’s their preference where they go apparently. It’s interesting that after travelling through Italy, France, Germany, Holland or wherever else that so many risk life and limb to get to the racist hell which is Britain.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Behind Enemy Lines Sussex 14 Aug 21 7.46pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Refugees have an international right to asylum. There is literally nothing that says it has to be in the first ‘safe’ country they manage to get to. I'll ask again: what is the maximum number of those claiming asylum would you find acceptable? What is the maximum number you would permit to claim asylum in the UK?
hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Jimenez  SELHURSTPARKCHESTER,DA BRONX 14 Aug 21 8.05pm |
|
|---|---|
|
How strange that we allow or seemingly allow men who are of fighting age the benefit of the doubt to stay in the country indefinitely, with probably a few very bad apples probably thrown out as a PR exercise? & yet we are unable to accept a few (probably a 100 or so) Afghanistani interpreters who worked for the coalition forces.
Pro USA & Israel |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 14 Aug 21 9.49pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
Refugees have an international right to asylum. There is literally nothing that says it has to be in the first ‘safe’ country they manage to get to. Possibly but not economic migrants
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 14 Aug 21 9.51pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
You’ve literally created your own definition driven by your own agenda. I’m using the international definition. How many times Dan, the majority are not refugees, they are economic migrants. I do have some experience in dealing personally with these people, not what I read in the Guardian
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 14 Aug 21 9.54pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
Or you could, you know, get the f*ck out of there and try and stay alive. Bet he wouldn’t leave his wife and kids behind though
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
cryrst  The garden of England 14 Aug 21 9.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
Bet he wouldn’t leave his wife and kids behind though Damn right I would not. Running let's you fight another day on the streets. It doesn't give the same benefit with an invasion.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 14 Aug 21 9.58pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Jimenez
How strange that we allow or seemingly allow men who are of fighting age the benefit of the doubt to stay in the country indefinitely, with probably a few very bad apples probably thrown out as a PR exercise? & yet we are unable to accept a few (probably a 100 or so) Afghanistani interpreters who worked for the coalition forces. As I have said previously, the way Afghan interpreters have been treated by all coalition forces is an absolute disgrace.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH SW2 14 Aug 21 10.39pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Spiderman
How many times Dan, the majority are not refugees, they are economic migrants. I do have some experience in dealing personally with these people, not what I read in the Guardian I’m literally only talking about refugees.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| DanH SW2 14 Aug 21 10.40pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines
Refugees have an international right to asylum. There is literally nothing that says it has to be in the first ‘safe’ country they manage to get to. I'll ask again: what is the maximum number of those claiming asylum would you find acceptable? What is the maximum number you would permit to claim asylum in the UK? Why do I suddenly have to come up with a quota? Wouldn’t a mind a one in one out system for some of the posters on here though if you’re worried about numbers.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Spiderman Horsham 14 Aug 21 10.49pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by DanH
I’m literally only talking about refugees. Are you?
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.