This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
ChrisGC Wantage 14 Feb 19 4.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
A shame to lose someone so fast Clearly said in irony but he must have known it was committing suicide. Probably bored with constant arguments and having all the negatives around defending a view point with very little light hearted banter and fun. As a matter of interest, I wonder which current poster used to be Hedgehog. My jaw nearly shattered where it hit the floor so hard when I saw this. You must have an industrial sized catapult to get that boulder through that glass roof!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mapletree Croydon 14 Feb 19 4.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ChrisGC
My jaw nearly shattered where it hit the floor so hard when I saw this. You must have an industrial sized catapult to get that boulder through that glass roof! I don't know what you are on about but I find you neither funny nor fun. I would not wish for your jaw to shatter though.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 14 Feb 19 5.12pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I asked you to re-read my comments because I have already answered this point, at some length so you have no excuses for missing it. To describe any criminal group by their racial origin is, almost by definition, racist. It suggests that all pakistanis are group rapists. Now I guess you will be in denial of that because you won't see it in the same way but for many it really does suggest that and, most importantly, it will to the whole pakistani community who will feel ostracised and marginalised when the objective must be the absolute opposite. Exactly the same considerations apply to the knife crime and terrorism. Crimes are committed by people and not by the colour of their skins. Condemn the sin and not the ethnicity of the sinner. We need to separate evil from things that aren't evil. Being pakistani and/or Muslim, Black or White, or anything else, is not evil and to suggest otherwise is racist. Oh dear. The origin, culture and or religion of the criminal might well be at the heart of the problem. If you can't understand that simple concept and would rather bury your head in rainbow colored sand then I really can't be bothered to explain it further. You are part of the problem.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 14 Feb 19 5.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
The most active retiree in history is back! Did you not read my explanation? I won't join the other threads but as this one covered one of the reasons I withdrew I decided to participate, primarily to shine a light on racism and the way that some people are in denial of it. The clue is in the thread's title. I haven't retired from life. Just from banging my head on brick walls.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 14 Feb 19 6.04pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by W12
The point is they are all our institutions right up to and including the house of lords and the monarchy are compromised by the same left wing ideology as you. They will never address any of these problems directly unless they change course and allow true free speech. You wonder why this is such a hot topic on forums like this but nobody dare express anything that might be even remotely *interpreted* asracist/sexist/Islamophobic etc in the real world. It's now taboo, a non-discussion and it's mass censorship. People are even getting knocks on the door by the Police for saying the wrong thing (I think they now call it non-criminal hate speech). In a world where people have their own "truth", nothing is objective and everything is relative and malleable (even gender) then everything can be explained by ideology. You are basically arguing that peoples right to be offended trumps all others and people do not have the agency to think for themselves (it's dangerous so let the state do it for us). It's madness and it also plays into the hands of extremists on both sides. I hate to be so blunt but that's just garbage. I am very far from being left wing. I am a traditional conservative voter who believes in free enterprise, democracy and the rule of law. That means that if we are unhappy with the way our government and it's systems are working then we change them, via the ballot box and not any other way. There is a difference between freedom of speech, which is a precious right, and the responsibility not to use hate speech which incites others to criminality. Some of us understand that and that society has matured to adapt to it. That some have not yet done so is very obvious.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 14 Feb 19 6.18pm | |
---|---|
Yes and I'm Karl Marx and so's my wife. .....You haven't seen Engels around the place have you?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 14 Feb 19 6.21pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Oh dear. The origin, culture and or religion of the criminal might well be at the heart of the problem. If you can't understand that simple concept and would rather bury your head in rainbow colored sand then I really can't be bothered to explain it further. You are part of the problem. No Sir. It is you who are part of the problem. It may well be the case that "the origin, culture and or religion of the criminal might well be at the heart of the problem". That though is absolutely no reason to tar all the nationals of a particular country with the same brush. It's a good reason to quietly examine it and work within the communities to ensure it is eradicated. We don't even know if these "pakistani rape gangs" are actually all pakistani. Some come from other cultures. Some will have been born here and hold British citizenship. Some will have naturalised. Why even mention it, unless you intend to convey some kind of negative connotation. Which then attaches to all members of that community. You don't specify their ages, height or weight. Just that they are pakistani. You don't even say they are assumed to be pakistani. Not recognising this as a mistaken way of dealing with an important issue is very regrettable because it just makes things worse and not better. What do you think is actually achieved by describing the gang rapes as being by "pakistanis"? Does it help the Police, or does it wind up negative sentiment towards the pakistani community? What is your ultimate solution to this problem and how does such descriptions help achieve that?
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Tom-the-eagle Croydon 14 Feb 19 6.22pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by laddo
Post brexit we’ve had anti-immigration rants, pro-Tommy Robinson posts, a suggestion that all Muslims are potential sexual predators, anger at there being platforms for black people to celebrate cultures largely forgotten due to slave-trade and now people suggesting something as innocent as speaking in ‘black accents’ should exclude you from the job market. Does HOL have an obsession with racism? When do you think it started to get so right-wing, bitter and scared of other cultures? I think brexit has given people licence to be far more vocal about their true feelings and ignorence. HOL always used to tackle delicate issues, with a real sense of debate. Now though, a number of posts come back to the same old tosh...an utter fear of foreigners or people with different skin shades or religions. Sad times.
"It feels much better than it ever did, much more sensitive." John Wayne Bobbit |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 14 Feb 19 6.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
No Sir. It is you who are part of the problem. It may well be the case that "the origin, culture and or religion of the criminal might well be at the heart of the problem". That though is absolutely no reason to tar all the nationals of a particular country with the same brush. It's a good reason to quietly examine it and work within the communities to ensure it is eradicated. We don't even know if these "pakistani rape gangs" are actually all pakistani. Some come from other cultures. Some will have been born here and hold British citizenship. Some will have naturalised. Why even mention it, unless you intend to convey some kind of negative connotation. Which then attaches to all members of that community. You don't specify their ages, height or weight. Just that they are pakistani. You don't even say they are assumed to be pakistani. Not recognising this as a mistaken way of dealing with an important issue is very regrettable because it just makes things worse and not better. What do you think is actually achieved by describing the gang rapes as being by "pakistanis"? Does it help the Police, or does it wind up negative sentiment towards the pakistani community? What is your ultimate solution to this problem and how does such descriptions help achieve that? Who has tarred any nationality with the same brush? Are you really giong to use that pathetic strawman nonsense? That is straight out of the deniers handbook of misrepresentation and you know it. It is very tiresome when you counter arguments that were never offered and then want to talk about who is a 'British citizen. It makes no difference where people are born. It is the religion and culture that determines who they are, not to mention, in this case, a lack of desire to integrate, except it seems, for the purposes of raping white girls. So how many pakistanis do you need on the list of rapists before we accept that this is a pakistani Muslim problem? 80% 90%? How many?
Shame on you. What if it was your daughter? Would you be preoccupied with protecting the reputation of a nation then? Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (14 Feb 2019 7.00pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 14 Feb 19 6.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
No Sir. It is you who are part of the problem. It may well be the case that "the origin, culture and or religion of the criminal might well be at the heart of the problem". No way is he. It's ideas of not causing offence to this particular asian community that enabled these rapes to continue for so long....because these institutions were frightened of idiots calling them racists. Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That though is absolutely no reason to tar all the nationals of a particular country with the same brush. It's a good reason to quietly examine it and work within the communities to ensure it is eradicated.
He never said 'all'. That's what you have done to try and demonise his position. Identifying a group with an accurate description of the vast majority of them is perfectly fine .....The BBC use the word 'Asian'.....Which itself is far far more inaccurate than using the country of origin of most of these rape gangs. Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
We don't even know if these "pakistani rape gangs" are actually all pakistani. Some come from other cultures. Some will have been born here and hold British citizenship. Some will have naturalised. Why even mention it, unless you intend to convey some kind of negative connotation. Which then attaches to all members of that community. You don't specify their ages, height or weight. Just that they are pakistani. You don't even say they are assumed to be pakistani. No one has blamed the 'whole community'. This is crap you are making up. Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Not recognising this as a mistaken way of dealing with an important issue is very regrettable because it just makes things worse and not better. What do you think is actually achieved by describing the gang rapes as being by "pakistanis"? Does it help the Police, or does it wind up negative sentiment towards the pakistani community? What is your ultimate solution to this problem and how does such descriptions help achieve that? Does it hurt Caucasian people when they are called 'English'....what a load of tripe. You ask people to have different rules for different groups......You prefer to distort the truth to save 'hurt feelings'. Such a traditional Tory voter. The Police have to caterogise if they are to even do their job. You make things worse because it's people like you who add to the resentment. Edited by Stirlingsays (14 Feb 2019 6.57pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
cryrst The garden of England 14 Feb 19 7.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
That's another distortion of what I wrote. Of course you can present facts without being accused of being racist or extremist. I do, and I am not. What you cannot do is select what facts you present, ignore others and context, and then not be accused of being either racist or extremist if your selection demonstrates that you are. See the difference? What many people here, and those like Robinson, don't do is attempt to "examine the root causes of terrible crimes". They go only as deep as their prejudices permit them to go and never get to the roots, which are often buried very deep, out of sight and need specialist skills to unravel. I am totally consistent with my judgement of people having learned many years ago that it was unwise to make exceptions just because you might have sympathy because of some kind of perceived disadvantage. People can be good, bad or a bit of both from whatever their background. I try to remember that. The root cause is the stupid book they practice with.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
W12 14 Feb 19 7.37pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I hate to be so blunt but that's just garbage. I am very far from being left wing. I am a traditional conservative voter who believes in free enterprise, democracy and the rule of law. That means that if we are unhappy with the way our government and it's systems are working then we change them, via the ballot box and not any other way. There is a difference between freedom of speech, which is a precious right, and the responsibility not to use hate speech which incites others to criminality. Some of us understand that and that society has matured to adapt to it. That some have not yet done so is very obvious. As this seems to be the crux of your argument what’s hate speech exactly and who gets to decide what’s hateful? What ever you think it is, at the moment it only applies to people considered to be in some way “oppressed”. Can you perhaps see any ideology behind this? Oh, and what do we do when nobody we vote for actually does what they specifically say they are going to especially fundamental things like protect us? Edited by W12 (14 Feb 2019 7.38pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.