Liberal Biased media... So that's a media that is biased towards the centre of the political spectrum, that lies between the points of left wing and the right wing.

Liberal Biased Media is a right wing neo-conservative phrase simply used to dismiss criticism irrespective of the content (which is often very valid, when your talking about Mexicans and Muslims in such wild generalisation).

The c**t is a mildly amusing rhetorician and classical popularist. Offering no real manifesto of policies or change, simply adapting his appeal to demographics.

Its the lowest form of politics, sophistry through rhetoric. And that's why people who believe it are stupid.

Build a wall along the border of Mexico, from the people who were against health care for all citizens. Ban on Muslims coming to the US, when the US economy is roughly 20% based on investment and trade with the Saudi's

Its smoke and mirror, like someone p1ssing on you and telling you its raining. The Republican party once actually engaged in politics and social programs, that benefitted the US, and were based on core beliefs held by the party, not what they objected to in others. The once engaged in politics, not partisan sniping and popularism.

"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

What baffles me is how a population of 320 million can only produce such useless candidates.
Obama has been a good figurehead but things are about to take a turn for the worse.
As if George W wasn't bad enough, the son of a man who destabilised the Middle East and was alleged by some to have been involved in the assassination of Kennedy.
Now we might have the wife of a former president or a man who makes Greg Stillson look sane.

the only people who should vote republican are the very wealthy. there's no reason anyone else should. if you say it's b/c of conservative social issues, then that's a lie b/c they do nothing about those except pay lip service. the only things they do actually vote for and do something about are tax cuts for rich people or increasing taxes for the poor and middle class. everything is pure rhetoric. trump is no different. he doesn't care about anyone and isn't going to part with his money for poor people, even if it's the right thing long term.

trump, i find, is actually quite unintelligent. even when guided, he has a poor understanding of the actual issues and the realities of his, what he's now calling, suggestions. very surface level "rabble-rabble" like a typically poor functioning and/or poorly educated voter who's just "mad" and "wants things to change."

it's endless fundraising these days. there was a report where members of congress spend almost the entire week "dialing for dollars." they almost have time for nothing else. the overall money spent on this years election will be staggering. i have no idea how we get anyone to do do it. a horrible job.

The only choice of vote for an average, not super rich, American is Bernie Sanders.....and he won't be on the ballot.

Billary won't be anywhere near as dangerous as Trump, but the average Josephine in the US will continue to be screwed over for the Fat Cats' benefit.

How people in the US and UK continue to vote for regimes that are actively trying to shaft the average voter is beyond my understanding.

Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune)

It's not fecked. It's just globalisation. Happening in most major cities around the world today. I was served an Englsh style Turkish kebab by a Chinese man in Sydney Australia this year. Is that fecked, or is it globalisation?

Edited by Brentmiester_General (20 May 2016 5.59am)

"We love you Palace, we f@cking hate Man U, We love you Palace, we hate the brighton too, We love you Palace we play in red 'n' blue, so f@ck you, and you ...