This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Penge Eagle Beckenham 03 Jan 18 8.20pm | |
---|---|
Everyone must know by now that the NHS must NEVER be criticised!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post | Board Moderator |
Mr_Gristle In the land of Whelk Eaters 03 Jan 18 8.26pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Interestingly, the budget for the NHS increases constantly. Fair points. However, I'd wager that for every inefficiency there is an example of profiteering or restrictive commercial practice gouging money out of the system. I hope you haven't had to have a prolonged stay in hospital in recent times Hrolf. If you have, then you might see just how much actually gets done with limited "human resources" - the money sinks are the kit, inflated executive pay (not as inflated as the private sector) contracted-out provision / poor contract management, consumables and non-generic drugs.
Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 03 Jan 18 8.31pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mr_Gristle
Fair points. However, I'd wager that for every inefficiency there is an example of profiteering or restrictive commercial practice gouging money out of the system. I hope you haven't had to have a prolonged stay in hospital in recent times Hrolf. If you have, then you might see just how much actually gets done with limited "human resources" - the money sinks are the kit, inflated executive pay (not as inflated as the private sector) contracted-out provision / poor contract management, consumables and non-generic drugs. Don't worry, Branson has us covered...
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 03 Jan 18 8.36pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mr_Gristle
Fair points. However, I'd wager that for every inefficiency there is an example of profiteering or restrictive commercial practice gouging money out of the system. I hope you haven't had to have a prolonged stay in hospital in recent times Hrolf. If you have, then you might see just how much actually gets done with limited "human resources" - the money sinks are the kit, inflated executive pay (not as inflated as the private sector) contracted-out provision / poor contract management, consumables and non-generic drugs. I agree. Money is wasted and syphoned in a number of ways and it is only by the dedication of the few that the whole thing functions at all.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Mr_Gristle In the land of Whelk Eaters 03 Jan 18 10.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I agree. Money is wasted and syphoned in a number of ways and it is only by the dedication of the few that the whole thing functions at all. Yep. The amount of NHS titsupness can only be proportional to the reduction in government tax take. Current government tax, public funding and privatisation policy will seem benign once the tax sh1tstorm from the upcoming surge of automation-driven job losses starts to bite.
Well I think Simon's head is large; always involved in espionage. (Name that tune) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jeeagles 03 Jan 18 11.20pm | |
---|---|
People in the U.K. love the NHS because they have never used another system. Having used a part subsided system, where you pay £40 for an initial appointment I have to say I'm completely won over. It eliminates the time wasters so doctors know you are actually ill and not another lying, lazy, workshy, a sick note, or hypochondriac. Surgeries want your business. The health service gets more funds. Doctors are incentivised to make sure your health issues are resolved, rather than just fobbing you off. More funds mean they can attract better staff. People also pay less tax and are have more of an incentive to look after themselves. £40 may sound like a lot, but given the amount of money I squander on trinkets it's really not that bad for the once or twice a year I might need it.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 03 Jan 18 11.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jeeagles
People in the U.K. love the NHS because they have never used another system. Having used a part subsided system, where you pay £40 for an initial appointment I have to say I'm completely won over. It eliminates the time wasters so doctors know you are actually ill and not another lying, lazy, workshy, a sick note, or hypochondriac. Surgeries want your business. The health service gets more funds. Doctors are incentivised to make sure your health issues are resolved, rather than just fobbing you off. More funds mean they can attract better staff. People also pay less tax and are have more of an incentive to look after themselves. £40 may sound like a lot, but given the amount of money I squander on trinkets it's really not that bad for the once or twice a year I might need it. That's fair enough but it would have to be means tested. Bear in mind loads of people are brassic even though they work.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
wordup 04 Jan 18 12.02am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by jeeagles
People in the U.K. love the NHS because they have never used another system. Having used a part subsided system, where you pay £40 for an initial appointment I have to say I'm completely won over. It eliminates the time wasters so doctors know you are actually ill and not another lying, lazy, workshy, a sick note, or hypochondriac. Surgeries want your business. The health service gets more funds. Doctors are incentivised to make sure your health issues are resolved, rather than just fobbing you off. More funds mean they can attract better staff. People also pay less tax and are have more of an incentive to look after themselves. £40 may sound like a lot, but given the amount of money I squander on trinkets it's really not that bad for the once or twice a year I might need it. Along the same lines, has anyone used that pushdoctor app servive that's often advertised on tv? It's £10 or £20 for an appointment I think, but I'm not sure to what extent they can assess health issues over a video chat? Maybe it's more for minor problems?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
nickgusset Shizzlehurst 04 Jan 18 12.39pm | |
---|---|
[Tweet Link]
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 04 Jan 18 1.01pm | |
---|---|
Using the NHS as a political football. Good work
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 04 Jan 18 1.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
I agree. Money is wasted and syphoned in a number of ways and it is only by the dedication of the few that the whole thing functions at all. That is not the factor and to the extent it is any kind of factor it is more than balanced by the savings in relation to the numbers of generally older Brits (immigrants generally being younger and healthier)who now live abroad within the EU. The relevant factor in so far as population is pertinent is our ageing population. I had to use Moorfields A&E on Christmas Eve night.Reminded me once again of what a superb thing the NHS is,and judging by my experience then,the important role provided by people born in other countries in helping provide us with that great service (from doctors down) at ground level.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 04 Jan 18 1.47pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by legaleagle
That is not the factor and to the extent it is any kind of factor it is more than balanced by the savings in relation to the numbers of generally older Brits (immigrants generally being younger and healthier)who now live abroad within the EU. The relevant factor in so far as population is pertinent is our ageing population. I had to use Moorfields A&E on Christmas Eve night.Reminded me once again of what a superb thing the NHS is,and judging by my experience then,the important role provided by people born in other countries in helping provide us with that great service (from doctors down) at ground level. This kind of typical. Using one factor to dismiss another. Then the classic reference to foreign staff that are here because of lack of investment for the training and pay of British workers. Edited by Hrolf The Ganger (04 Jan 2018 1.47pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.