You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Labour Leadership - Bald men fighting over a comb?
November 24 2024 12.41am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Labour Leadership - Bald men fighting over a comb?

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 11 of 31 < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >

  

fed up eagle Flag Between Horley, Surrey and Preston... 22 Jul 15 7.51pm Send a Private Message to fed up eagle Add fed up eagle as a friend

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 7.27pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 7.03pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 6.34pm

Quote fed up eagle at 22 Jul 2015 6.23pm

Quote beagle at 22 Jul 2015 5.56pm

Loads of callers on 5 live this morning talking about how he would represent 'the working class'.

I'm not sure I know exactly who 'the working class' are.


For me the working class are anyone who gets out of bed in the morning and holds down a regular job. That's me and probably most of the people who have commented on this thread, however, I sure as hell don't believe that Labour represent me. To me they're the party that presided over mass immigration and the party that deliberately abandoned our borders. I hope the most unelectable candidate wins the leadership race, like Miliband did. Then hopefully they'll be in opposition for a long time to come.

Spot on Fed Up Eagle, the Labour Party has not represented the interests of the people whose forbears formed it for a long time now.

Edited by leggedstruggle (22 Jul 2015 6.34pm)

On what principles was the Labour party formed?
What are Corbyn's principles in essence?

Notice any similarities?

You bemoan Corbyn, then say that what they need is someone like him. Priceless.

Corbyn believes in higher Government spending, higher taxes, wants nuclear disarmament, more environment spending and sees no downside to mass immigration. He should be in the Green party, his ideas do not serve the ordinary working person.


For me the Labour party are as irrelevant as the Green party.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 22 Jul 15 7.56pm

Quote fed up eagle at 22 Jul 2015 7.51pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 7.27pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 7.03pm

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 6.34pm

Quote fed up eagle at 22 Jul 2015 6.23pm

Quote beagle at 22 Jul 2015 5.56pm

Loads of callers on 5 live this morning talking about how he would represent 'the working class'.

I'm not sure I know exactly who 'the working class' are.


For me the working class are anyone who gets out of bed in the morning and holds down a regular job. That's me and probably most of the people who have commented on this thread, however, I sure as hell don't believe that Labour represent me. To me they're the party that presided over mass immigration and the party that deliberately abandoned our borders. I hope the most unelectable candidate wins the leadership race, like Miliband did. Then hopefully they'll be in opposition for a long time to come.

Spot on Fed Up Eagle, the Labour Party has not represented the interests of the people whose forbears formed it for a long time now.

Edited by leggedstruggle (22 Jul 2015 6.34pm)

On what principles was the Labour party formed?
What are Corbyn's principles in essence?

Notice any similarities?

You bemoan Corbyn, then say that what they need is someone like him. Priceless.

Corbyn believes in higher Government spending, higher taxes, wants nuclear disarmament, more environment spending and sees no downside to mass immigration. He should be in the Green party, his ideas do not serve the ordinary working person.


For me the Labour party are as irrelevant as the Green party.

Quelle surprise!

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 22 Jul 15 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 7.50pm

What is he going to spend higher taxes on?
Sorting out the nhs. I'm happy to pay a few more quid in taxes on that.
And education, I'm quite happy for my taxes to help towards that, if it costs more to me, so be it. Tis for the greater good.
Building houses, creating jobs in the process, making sure they are sustainable and affordable.

as for green energy.
What have solar and wind power in common.?
They are free. No money is there to be made from it's extraction. No one can profit from owning the wind yet -
Anyone with half a brain would realise that plundering the earth's resources is crass stupidity in this day and age.

You think that throwing money at the NHS and education will solve all the problems. Money has been thrown at both for years with little effect. What solar and wind power have in common is that they can only produce a fraction of the power needed and cost a great deal to build.

[Link]

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
beagle Flag pom tiddly om pom pom 23 Jul 15 8.00am Send a Private Message to beagle Add beagle as a friend

Quote ghosteagle at 22 Jul 2015 6.42pm

Quote beagle at 22 Jul 2015 5.56pm

Loads of callers on 5 live this morning talking about how he would represent 'the working class'.

I'm not sure I know exactly who 'the working class' are.

That would seem to indicate that you are not a member.

One isn't, you know.

 


When the time comes, I want die just like my Dad - at peace and asleep.
Not screaming and terrified.
Like his passengers.

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
palace_in_frogland Flag In a broken dream 23 Jul 15 8.28am Send a Private Message to palace_in_frogland Add palace_in_frogland as a friend

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 7.50pm

What is he going to spend higher taxes on?
Sorting out the nhs. I'm happy to pay a few more quid in taxes on that.
And education, I'm quite happy for my taxes to help towards that, if it costs more to me, so be it. Tis for the greater good.
Building houses, creating jobs in the process, making sure they are sustainable and affordable.

as for green energy.
What have solar and wind power in common.?
They are free. No money is there to be made from it's extraction. No one can profit from owning the wind yet -
Anyone with half a brain would realise that plundering the earth's resources is crass stupidity in this day and age.

You think that throwing money at the NHS and education will solve all the problems. Money has been thrown at both for years with little effect. What solar and wind power have in common is that they can only produce a fraction of the power needed and cost a great deal to build.

[Link]


What solar and wind power also have in common is that they require complex control and regulation circuitry. This requires rare earth metals to function.

Rare earth metals are extracted using dangerous and environmentally damaging mining techniques. Plundering the earth's resources, if you will.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
npn Flag Crowborough 23 Jul 15 8.41am Send a Private Message to npn Add npn as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 7.50pm

What is he going to spend higher taxes on?
Sorting out the nhs. I'm happy to pay a few more quid in taxes on that.
And education, I'm quite happy for my taxes to help towards that, if it costs more to me, so be it. Tis for the greater good.
Building houses, creating jobs in the process, making sure they are sustainable and affordable.

as for green energy.
What have solar and wind power in common.?
They are free. No money is there to be made from it's extraction. No one can profit from owning the wind yet -
Anyone with half a brain would realise that plundering the earth's resources is crass stupidity in this day and age.


It is a strange point for me that I would, and have in the past, vote Tory.
I would, and have in the past, vote Green.

Yet the Labour party as it stands doesn't appeal to me in the slightest. Maybe Corbyn would attract some Tory voters after all (I'm not ruling it out until I see what he proposes)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
dannyh Flag wherever I lay my hat....... 23 Jul 15 9.31am Send a Private Message to dannyh Add dannyh as a friend

Corbyn is as far left as Nick Griffin is right. I would love it if he got control of the labour party, as that would be the final nail in the coffin for what is now a joke party. The labour party members have basically turned the party into a parody of itself.

 


"It's not the bullet that's got my name on it that concerns me; it's all them other ones flyin' around marked 'To Whom It May Concern.'"

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 23 Jul 15 9.37am

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 7.50pm

What is he going to spend higher taxes on?
Sorting out the nhs. I'm happy to pay a few more quid in taxes on that.
And education, I'm quite happy for my taxes to help towards that, if it costs more to me, so be it. Tis for the greater good.
Building houses, creating jobs in the process, making sure they are sustainable and affordable.

as for green energy.
What have solar and wind power in common.?
They are free. No money is there to be made from it's extraction. No one can profit from owning the wind yet -
Anyone with half a brain would realise that plundering the earth's resources is crass stupidity in this day and age.

You think that throwing money at the NHS and education will solve all the problems. Money has been thrown at both for years with little effect. What solar and wind power have in common is that they can only produce a fraction of the power needed and cost a great deal to build.

[Link]

Do you think that just cutting spending will provide a solution.

Of course Solar and Wind power are less efficient and will cost more. That isn't the real issue, the real issue lies with the actual environmental consequences of oil and fossil fuels, and the socio-political impact of fossil fuel dependency. Only idiots believe alternative fuels are ever going to be cheaper.

The difference of course, is that at source they have minimal environmental impact, don't cost lives to dig out the ground, or wars to secure, they don't occasionally spill out the side of tankers, they won't run out or get affected by supply factors and the pollution factor is negligible.

Its not an economic argument, its an environmental one. Easily accessed oil is slowly being tapped out.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 23 Jul 15 9.42am

Quote palace_in_frogland at 23 Jul 2015 8.28am

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 7.50pm

What is he going to spend higher taxes on?
Sorting out the nhs. I'm happy to pay a few more quid in taxes on that.
And education, I'm quite happy for my taxes to help towards that, if it costs more to me, so be it. Tis for the greater good.
Building houses, creating jobs in the process, making sure they are sustainable and affordable.

as for green energy.
What have solar and wind power in common.?
They are free. No money is there to be made from it's extraction. No one can profit from owning the wind yet -
Anyone with half a brain would realise that plundering the earth's resources is crass stupidity in this day and age.

You think that throwing money at the NHS and education will solve all the problems. Money has been thrown at both for years with little effect. What solar and wind power have in common is that they can only produce a fraction of the power needed and cost a great deal to build.

[Link]


What solar and wind power also have in common is that they require complex control and regulation circuitry. This requires rare earth metals to function.

Rare earth metals are extracted using dangerous and environmentally damaging mining techniques. Plundering the earth's resources, if you will.

True, but as we're digging them out of the ground for all manner of machinery anyhow, that factor is limited. Of course Oil Refineries and Power Plants, along with fuel distribution systems and storage system pretty much use rare earth mentals extracted using dangerous and environmentally damaging mining techniques. Plus occasionally have exploded or spilled out into the oceans and land, and when burned produce pollution emissions.

Its really about the lesser environmental impact, not being the magic bean. The primary problem is the increasing population that industrial society has spammed into overdrive, and the increasing demand that places on fuel sources and resources.


 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
leggedstruggle Flag Croydon 23 Jul 15 9.49am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 23 Jul 2015 9.37am

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 7.50pm

What is he going to spend higher taxes on?
Sorting out the nhs. I'm happy to pay a few more quid in taxes on that.
And education, I'm quite happy for my taxes to help towards that, if it costs more to me, so be it. Tis for the greater good.
Building houses, creating jobs in the process, making sure they are sustainable and affordable.

as for green energy.
What have solar and wind power in common.?
They are free. No money is there to be made from it's extraction. No one can profit from owning the wind yet -
Anyone with half a brain would realise that plundering the earth's resources is crass stupidity in this day and age.

You think that throwing money at the NHS and education will solve all the problems. Money has been thrown at both for years with little effect. What solar and wind power have in common is that they can only produce a fraction of the power needed and cost a great deal to build.

[Link]

Do you think that just cutting spending will provide a solution.

Of course Solar and Wind power are less efficient and will cost more. That isn't the real issue, the real issue lies with the actual environmental consequences of oil and fossil fuels, and the socio-political impact of fossil fuel dependency. Only idiots believe alternative fuels are ever going to be cheaper.

The difference of course, is that at source they have minimal environmental impact, don't cost lives to dig out the ground, or wars to secure, they don't occasionally spill out the side of tankers, they won't run out or get affected by supply factors and the pollution factor is negligible.

Its not an economic argument, its an environmental one. Easily accessed oil is slowly being tapped out.


Wind and solar output contributes a tiny fraction of our needs. We would need to cover the entire country in wind-turbines and solar panels which might have 'actual environmental consequences'.

Cutting cots in the NHS will indeed improve things, I know two people working in the NHS as PAs who do almost nothing - a bloated, inefficent, over-staffed money drain.

 


mother-in-law is an anagram of woman hitler

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
jamiemartin721 Flag Reading 23 Jul 15 10.01am

Quote leggedstruggle at 23 Jul 2015 9.49am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 23 Jul 2015 9.37am

Quote leggedstruggle at 22 Jul 2015 9.32pm

Quote nickgusset at 22 Jul 2015 7.50pm

What is he going to spend higher taxes on?
Sorting out the nhs. I'm happy to pay a few more quid in taxes on that.
And education, I'm quite happy for my taxes to help towards that, if it costs more to me, so be it. Tis for the greater good.
Building houses, creating jobs in the process, making sure they are sustainable and affordable.

as for green energy.
What have solar and wind power in common.?
They are free. No money is there to be made from it's extraction. No one can profit from owning the wind yet -
Anyone with half a brain would realise that plundering the earth's resources is crass stupidity in this day and age.

You think that throwing money at the NHS and education will solve all the problems. Money has been thrown at both for years with little effect. What solar and wind power have in common is that they can only produce a fraction of the power needed and cost a great deal to build.

[Link]

Do you think that just cutting spending will provide a solution.

Of course Solar and Wind power are less efficient and will cost more. That isn't the real issue, the real issue lies with the actual environmental consequences of oil and fossil fuels, and the socio-political impact of fossil fuel dependency. Only idiots believe alternative fuels are ever going to be cheaper.

The difference of course, is that at source they have minimal environmental impact, don't cost lives to dig out the ground, or wars to secure, they don't occasionally spill out the side of tankers, they won't run out or get affected by supply factors and the pollution factor is negligible.

Its not an economic argument, its an environmental one. Easily accessed oil is slowly being tapped out.


Wind and solar output contributes a tiny fraction of our needs. We would need to cover the entire country in wind-turbines and solar panels which might have 'actual environmental consequences'.

Cutting cots in the NHS will indeed improve things, I know two people working in the NHS as PAs who do almost nothing - a bloated, inefficent, over-staffed money drain.

I think the idea is that by investing in 'environmentally' better fuel sources, that ultimately the technology and efficiency will likely improve and that it would be a contributory system of power generation that reduced the dependency on fossil fuels.

The simple fact is that fossil fuel dependency has a 'COB date' measured in generations, and will become an increasing problem in terms of pollution as populations increase, especially given the industrialization of countries like India, where increasing car ownership will be a problem.

Electric cars were s**t 10 years ago, but now the Prius Hybrid can hold its own against traditional fuel motor cars.

Of course my personal view is that I don't really care that much, as I'll be dead and buried by the time its a problem and I have no kids. So it is hard for me to get behind the cause, but I do understand where they are coming from.

 


"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug"
[Link]

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
Hoof Hearted 23 Jul 15 10.15am

Quote jamiemartin721 at 22 Jul 2015 12.01pm

If Labour had won the Scottish seats, no one would have won the election.



You need a maths lesson!

The Conservatives won an electable majority on their own to govern.

Giving Labour another 51 seats would change nothing.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 11 of 31 < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Labour Leadership - Bald men fighting over a comb?