This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Seth On a pale blue dot 23 Nov 14 1.35am | |
---|---|
I'll never stop finding it amusingly ironic that the poster known as Hrolf The Ganger, that hater of all things multicultural and one so terribly put out by the "waves of immigrants" he perceives, and so terrified of being "swamped" by foreigners, takes his name from a Viking invader who conquered foreign lands and imposed his culture on them at the point of a sword. The historian Adhemar recorded that on nearing his death Rollo [Hrolf] had a hundred Christian prisoners beheaded in front of himself to appease and honour the old gods Edited by Seth (23 Nov 2014 1.35am)
"You can feel the stadium jumping. The stadium is actually physically moving up and down" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 23 Nov 14 10.17am | |
---|---|
Quote Ian J at 22 Nov 2014 6.58pm
Quote legaleagle at 22 Nov 2014 6.15pm
Thank you for posting a vivid example illustrating one of the ills of our society much better than I could have. Let's not evolve to a more civilised point where we reject and condemn (not hang, draw and quarter)casual racism in everyday speech Funny how so many of those who say "what's all the fuss about/why are they so over sensitive " aren't the recipients of the remarks. Why don't all these do-gooders stop letting political correctness run wild and concentrate more on going to a Chink restaurant for a good old dim sum and get in a few good "slitty eye" jokes for good effect?.The Chinese like it really, everyone knows that. Let's get Moody back asap, try and replace Warnock replaced with Malky and applaud Dave Whelan for his comments in a 2011 radio interview that it was "out of order" for black players to complain about being racially abused during matches. For God's sake, why don't those players stop making such a mountain out of a molehill, quit bloody moaning, get a sense of proportion and focus on real issues like complaining about immigrants. And while we're at it, let's set an example against these silly sensitive people by all making a positive effort to use the N word whenever possible, particularly in the presence of black people. After all, what's so bad about racist abuse or stereotypes? Viva your common sense and proportionality! let's stop this silly nonsense and focus on real issues, and which casual racism from people with a public profile absolutely isn't. Think about it. It's a shame that we can't discuss issues like this sensibly without either going completely OTT as you've done or insulting other forum members as one particular individual has done. I'm interested to know why we are all up in arms because someone thought it acceptable to call Chinese people chinkies yet this forum is absolutely choc a block with insults of every description regarding gay people and if you don't believe me just post anything with reference to Brighton and see what the results are I have gone slightly OTT on this one granted , but I don't regret a word I've written and if I did insult someone, well racism is an emotive issue and what they wrote about Whelan and Malky's remarks appalled me.You make an absolutely valid point about the gay jibes on here (and the lack of jumping on them) though two wrongs don't make a right. To me, if someone with a high public profile makes racist (and yes they were racist and anti-Semitic, no possible doubt about it in my opinion) comments to a national newspaper followed by an apology which actually isn't an apology at all along with that hoary old anti-Semitic chestnut that loads of his friends are Jewish, it makes me want to puke, maybe all the more so as a member of a group on the other end of it. If others disagree that its racist and anti-semitic or think such casual racism is no big deal, that's for them ultimately.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
legaleagle 23 Nov 14 10.39am | |
---|---|
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 22 Nov 2014 11.15pm
Quote legaleagle at 22 Nov 2014 6.15pm
Thank you for posting a vivid example illustrating one of the ills of our society much better than I could have. Let's not evolve to a more civilised point where we reject and condemn (not hang, draw and quarter)casual racism in everyday speech Funny how so many of those who say "what's all the fuss about/why are they so over sensitive " aren't the recipients of the remarks. Why don't all these do-gooders stop letting political correctness run wild and concentrate more on going to a Chink restaurant for a good old dim sum and get in a few good "slitty eye" jokes for good effect?.The Chinese like it really, everyone knows that. Let's get Moody back asap, try and replace Warnock replaced with Malky and applaud Dave Whelan for his comments in a 2011 radio interview that it was "out of order" for black players to complain about being racially abused during matches. For God's sake, why don't those players stop making such a mountain out of a molehill, quit bloody moaning, get a sense of proportion and focus on real issues like complaining about immigrants. And while we're at it, let's set an example against these silly sensitive people by all making a positive effort to use the N word whenever possible, particularly in the presence of black people. After all, what's so bad about racist abuse or stereotypes? Viva your common sense and proportionality! let's stop this silly nonsense and focus on real issues, and which casual racism from people with a public profile absolutely isn't. Think about it. Edited by legaleagle (22 Nov 2014 6.18pm) I accept your post as a very reasonable counter argument. I would agree that casual racism in public is distasteful and insulting if personal. What you might want to think about is Whelan's distinction several times in his remarks between "English" people and "Jews" and "English" people and "Chinese" people. The logical conclusion being that Jews living here aren't English, nor people of Chinese origin nor maybe to him, Black people or Asian people. My family, along with most other Jewish people here, came here over a hundred years ago, but we're still not "English" in the eyes of people like Whelan.At what point exactly are they/we allowed not to be distinguished so fundamentally on grounds of religion or race? There has been a Chinese community since at least the 19th century. That's why Whelan's remarks go to the heart of something very important about how we regard immigrants and a multi cultural society. The same remarks about being "swamped" etc that are made today about immigrants now are exactly those made about Jewish immigration a hundred plus years ago. It can be seen now that the arguments about that immigration signalling "swamping" and the end of the world here, were a complete load of tosh. Just like, for example, the arguments about immigrants from the West Indies 40-60 years ago. Blaming our woes largely on immigration has been for a long time and continues to be a great way of distracting attention away from the real causes of why people feel disadvantaged. Actually, arguably the main "foreign" influence changing this country since 1942 has been American, economically, politically and culturally, and involving next to no immigration.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 23 Nov 14 11.11am | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 23 Nov 2014 10.17am
I have gone slightly OTT on this one granted , but I don't regret a word I've written and if I did insult someone, well racism is an emotive issue It wasn't you that I was having a dig at for insulting other forum members but the Despotic Banana Brain (see, we can all do it) who's two contributions to this debate were just to insult others without adding anything of value. Still I suppose that this is a football forum so you can't expect intellectual debate from everyone
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Plane Bromley 23 Nov 14 11.13am | |
---|---|
Quote Ian J at 23 Nov 2014 11.11am
Quote legaleagle at 23 Nov 2014 10.17am
I have gone slightly OTT on this one granted , but I don't regret a word I've written and if I did insult someone, well racism is an emotive issue It wasn't you that I was having a dig at for insulting other forum members but the Despotic Banana Brain (see, we can all do it) who's two contributions to this debate were just to insult others without adding anything of value. Still I suppose that this is a football forum so you can't expect intellectual debate from everyone You did it again
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 23 Nov 14 12.05pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 23 Nov 2014 10.39am
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 22 Nov 2014 11.15pm
Quote legaleagle at 22 Nov 2014 6.15pm
Thank you for posting a vivid example illustrating one of the ills of our society much better than I could have. Let's not evolve to a more civilised point where we reject and condemn (not hang, draw and quarter)casual racism in everyday speech Funny how so many of those who say "what's all the fuss about/why are they so over sensitive " aren't the recipients of the remarks. Why don't all these do-gooders stop letting political correctness run wild and concentrate more on going to a Chink restaurant for a good old dim sum and get in a few good "slitty eye" jokes for good effect?.The Chinese like it really, everyone knows that. Let's get Moody back asap, try and replace Warnock replaced with Malky and applaud Dave Whelan for his comments in a 2011 radio interview that it was "out of order" for black players to complain about being racially abused during matches. For God's sake, why don't those players stop making such a mountain out of a molehill, quit bloody moaning, get a sense of proportion and focus on real issues like complaining about immigrants. And while we're at it, let's set an example against these silly sensitive people by all making a positive effort to use the N word whenever possible, particularly in the presence of black people. After all, what's so bad about racist abuse or stereotypes? Viva your common sense and proportionality! let's stop this silly nonsense and focus on real issues, and which casual racism from people with a public profile absolutely isn't. Think about it. Edited by legaleagle (22 Nov 2014 6.18pm) I accept your post as a very reasonable counter argument. I would agree that casual racism in public is distasteful and insulting if personal. What you might want to think about is Whelan's distinction several times in his remarks between "English" people and "Jews" and "English" people and "Chinese" people. The logical conclusion being that Jews living here aren't English, nor people of Chinese origin nor maybe to him, Black people or Asian people. My family, along with most other Jewish people here, came here over a hundred years ago, but we're still not "English" in the eyes of people like Whelan.At what point exactly are they/we allowed not to be distinguished so fundamentally on grounds of religion or race? There has been a Chinese community since at least the 19th century. That's why Whelan's remarks go to the heart of something very important about how we regard immigrants and a multi cultural society. The same remarks about being "swamped" etc that are made today about immigrants now are exactly those made about Jewish immigration a hundred plus years ago. It can be seen now that the arguments about that immigration signalling "swamping" and the end of the world here, were a complete load of tosh. Just like, for example, the arguments about immigrants from the West Indies 40-60 years ago. Blaming our woes largely on immigration has been for a long time and continues to be a great way of distracting attention away from the real causes of why people feel disadvantaged. Actually, arguably the main "foreign" influence changing this country since 1942 has been American, economically, politically and culturally, and involving next to no immigration. I agree with a lot of what you say. however we are all naturally biased in our opinions.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 23 Nov 14 12.12pm | |
---|---|
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 23 Nov 2014 12.05pm
Quote legaleagle at 23 Nov 2014 10.39am
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 22 Nov 2014 11.15pm
Quote legaleagle at 22 Nov 2014 6.15pm
Thank you for posting a vivid example illustrating one of the ills of our society much better than I could have. Let's not evolve to a more civilised point where we reject and condemn (not hang, draw and quarter)casual racism in everyday speech Funny how so many of those who say "what's all the fuss about/why are they so over sensitive " aren't the recipients of the remarks. Why don't all these do-gooders stop letting political correctness run wild and concentrate more on going to a Chink restaurant for a good old dim sum and get in a few good "slitty eye" jokes for good effect?.The Chinese like it really, everyone knows that. Let's get Moody back asap, try and replace Warnock replaced with Malky and applaud Dave Whelan for his comments in a 2011 radio interview that it was "out of order" for black players to complain about being racially abused during matches. For God's sake, why don't those players stop making such a mountain out of a molehill, quit bloody moaning, get a sense of proportion and focus on real issues like complaining about immigrants. And while we're at it, let's set an example against these silly sensitive people by all making a positive effort to use the N word whenever possible, particularly in the presence of black people. After all, what's so bad about racist abuse or stereotypes? Viva your common sense and proportionality! let's stop this silly nonsense and focus on real issues, and which casual racism from people with a public profile absolutely isn't. Think about it. Edited by legaleagle (22 Nov 2014 6.18pm) I accept your post as a very reasonable counter argument. I would agree that casual racism in public is distasteful and insulting if personal. What you might want to think about is Whelan's distinction several times in his remarks between "English" people and "Jews" and "English" people and "Chinese" people. The logical conclusion being that Jews living here aren't English, nor people of Chinese origin nor maybe to him, Black people or Asian people. My family, along with most other Jewish people here, came here over a hundred years ago, but we're still not "English" in the eyes of people like Whelan.At what point exactly are they/we allowed not to be distinguished so fundamentally on grounds of religion or race? There has been a Chinese community since at least the 19th century. That's why Whelan's remarks go to the heart of something very important about how we regard immigrants and a multi cultural society. The same remarks about being "swamped" etc that are made today about immigrants now are exactly those made about Jewish immigration a hundred plus years ago. It can be seen now that the arguments about that immigration signalling "swamping" and the end of the world here, were a complete load of tosh. Just like, for example, the arguments about immigrants from the West Indies 40-60 years ago. Blaming our woes largely on immigration has been for a long time and continues to be a great way of distracting attention away from the real causes of why people feel disadvantaged. Actually, arguably the main "foreign" influence changing this country since 1942 has been American, economically, politically and culturally, and involving next to no immigration. I agree with a lot of what you say. however we are all naturally biased in our opinions. Edited by legaleagle (23 Nov 2014 10.51am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Midlands Eagle 23 Nov 14 3.35pm | |
---|---|
Quote Plane at 23 Nov 2014 11.13am
Quote Ian J at 23 Nov 2014 11.11am
Quote legaleagle at 23 Nov 2014 10.17am
I have gone slightly OTT on this one granted , but I don't regret a word I've written and if I did insult someone, well racism is an emotive issue It wasn't you that I was having a dig at for insulting other forum members but the Despotic Banana Brain (see, we can all do it) who's two contributions to this debate were just to insult others without adding anything of value. Still I suppose that this is a football forum so you can't expect intellectual debate from everyone You did it again Shhhh. No-one else noticed
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
TUX redhill 23 Nov 14 4.01pm | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 21 Nov 2014 9.54pm
Dear TUX, Don't you realise there is such a thing as a stereotypical racist comment?! A stereotype per se is not necessarily racist. A stereotype based on supposed characteristics distinguished by race can be racist A stereotype based on supposed characteristics distinguished by being Jewish can be anti-semitic. When I said I wasn't going to engage with you about garbage like the substance of your/Malky's and Whelan's views,I'm not. As I said earlier, in my opinion, trash doesn't need dignifying and shouldn't be dignified by me in that way. You are right, though. I should keep from replying to you at all (hadn't yet loggged off from my last post!).Others have put the point. Sorry and full apologies for replying Last thought. You think I am insulting you? At least, unlike you,I'm not insulting an entire large group of people. In that sense I am a mere Andorra to your England. Edited by legaleagle (21 Nov 2014 11.10pm) I never mentioned Malkys views as that was not in the debate. So another FAIL on your part.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 24 Nov 14 11.18am | |
---|---|
Quote Seth at 23 Nov 2014 1.35am
I'll never stop finding it amusingly ironic that the poster known as Hrolf The Ganger, that hater of all things multicultural and one so terribly put out by the "waves of immigrants" he perceives, and so terrified of being "swamped" by foreigners, takes his name from a Viking invader who conquered foreign lands and imposed his culture on them at the point of a sword. The historian Adhemar recorded that on nearing his death Rollo [Hrolf] had a hundred Christian prisoners beheaded in front of himself to appease and honour the old gods Edited by Seth (23 Nov 2014 1.35am) Ayran blonde haired blue eyed invaders are acceptable maybe?
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
jamiemartin721 Reading 24 Nov 14 11.23am | |
---|---|
Quote legaleagle at 23 Nov 2014 10.39am
Quote Hrolf The Ganger at 22 Nov 2014 11.15pm
Quote legaleagle at 22 Nov 2014 6.15pm
Thank you for posting a vivid example illustrating one of the ills of our society much better than I could have. Let's not evolve to a more civilised point where we reject and condemn (not hang, draw and quarter)casual racism in everyday speech Funny how so many of those who say "what's all the fuss about/why are they so over sensitive " aren't the recipients of the remarks. Why don't all these do-gooders stop letting political correctness run wild and concentrate more on going to a Chink restaurant for a good old dim sum and get in a few good "slitty eye" jokes for good effect?.The Chinese like it really, everyone knows that. Let's get Moody back asap, try and replace Warnock replaced with Malky and applaud Dave Whelan for his comments in a 2011 radio interview that it was "out of order" for black players to complain about being racially abused during matches. For God's sake, why don't those players stop making such a mountain out of a molehill, quit bloody moaning, get a sense of proportion and focus on real issues like complaining about immigrants. And while we're at it, let's set an example against these silly sensitive people by all making a positive effort to use the N word whenever possible, particularly in the presence of black people. After all, what's so bad about racist abuse or stereotypes? Viva your common sense and proportionality! let's stop this silly nonsense and focus on real issues, and which casual racism from people with a public profile absolutely isn't. Think about it. Edited by legaleagle (22 Nov 2014 6.18pm) I accept your post as a very reasonable counter argument. I would agree that casual racism in public is distasteful and insulting if personal. What you might want to think about is Whelan's distinction several times in his remarks between "English" people and "Jews" and "English" people and "Chinese" people. The logical conclusion being that Jews living here aren't English, nor people of Chinese origin nor maybe to him, Black people or Asian people. My family, along with most other Jewish people here, came here over a hundred years ago, but we're still not "English" in the eyes of people like Whelan.At what point exactly are they/we allowed not to be distinguished so fundamentally on grounds of religion or race? There has been a Chinese community since at least the 19th century. That's why Whelan's remarks go to the heart of something very important about how we regard immigrants and a multi cultural society. The same remarks about being "swamped" etc that are made today about immigrants now are exactly those made about Jewish immigration a hundred plus years ago. It can be seen now that the arguments about that immigration signalling "swamping" and the end of the world here, were a complete load of tosh. Just like, for example, the arguments about immigrants from the West Indies 40-60 years ago. Blaming our woes largely on immigration has been for a long time and continues to be a great way of distracting attention away from the real causes of why people feel disadvantaged. Actually, arguably the main "foreign" influence changing this country since 1942 has been American, economically, politically and culturally, and involving next to no immigration.
Good argument, and a valid discursive observation, the separation of the idea of a nationality from 'minority' ethnicities, is itself a structuralized form of racism, in that it is supportive of the idea (Nationalism) of a positive ideal whilst singling out negatives and distancing them from that idea (in this case race, religion etc) by association with a negative. This reminds me of Wetherall and Potter's classic discursive study of immigration and racism in New Zealand (198. Language is not a neutral means of communication after all, but a means of positioning.
"One Nation Under God, has turned into One Nation Under the Influence of One Drug" |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
sydtheeagle England 24 Nov 14 11.33am | |
---|---|
It amuses me no end that the same board right wingers who were so astoundingly offended by Emily Thornberry's lazy classist remarks last week find Dave Whelan's lazy racist remarks this week so palatable. At least those of us on the left are not hypocrites, and criticise all 'isms not matter the source. Right-wingers, as usual, are not equal opportunity observers.
Sydenham by birth. Selhurst by the Grace of God. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.