You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Selfish Firefighters on Strike
November 24 2024 1.28am

This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.

Selfish Firefighters on Strike

Previous Topic | Next Topic


Page 11 of 12 < 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

  

Pussay Patrol Flag 24 Feb 15 11.04pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 9.46pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 9.39pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 9.15pm

Quote pefwin at 24 Feb 2015 8.58pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 8.06pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 7.53pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 7.51pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 7.47pm

Quote pefwin at 24 Feb 2015 7.25pm

Quote nickgusset at 23 Feb 2015 10.50pm

.


How many people have not been re-deployed and how many have not got an ill health pension?


I don't know to be fair. All I've heard is anecdotal from some Fire Brigade friends who say people they've worked with have had their pension payout reduced through enforced early retirement.


Every line of work I've ever had has had reduced pension rights if you retire early, enforced or otherwise.

Even if the goalposts (or pension ages) are moved?


Edited by nickgusset (24 Feb 2015 7.53pm)


Well I got made redundant from a firm that had provided a defined benefit scheme, and now I'm in a defined contribution scheme which of course is much more market sensitive.

Neither scheme provides any accrued benefit for years you've not worked, whether that's through ill health or any other reason. I'd have been miles better off to still be in the defined benefit scheme though.

Why would you expect deferred pay for a time when you did not work for a company?


I wouldn't, I never worked in an industry that provided that kind of benefit, so why would any other worker expect it, if they've retired early per Nick's point?


The FBU's gripe is that because the retirement age for them has been raised, they are being forced into early retirement because they won't be fit enough at the new age and are being penalised for being made to retire early.
One would imagine that there was a reason why the retirement age was lower!


The same applies to all of us though doesn't it? Anyone born after 1978 will hasve to work until they are 68 before they get their state pension for the same reason - we're living longer!

You're wasting your time with logic and common sense. My Dad still works as a gas engineer at 69, he's as fit as a fiddle, could go another 10. And yet the FBU would have you believe these firemen are ready for the knackers yard at 55.

The only lies are coming from the Union if you ask me

 


Paua oouaarancì Irà chiyeah Ishé galé ma ba oo ah

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 24 Feb 15 11.42pm

Quote Pussay Patrol at 24 Feb 2015 11.04pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 9.46pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 9.39pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 9.15pm

Quote pefwin at 24 Feb 2015 8.58pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 8.06pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 7.53pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 7.51pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 7.47pm

Quote pefwin at 24 Feb 2015 7.25pm

Quote nickgusset at 23 Feb 2015 10.50pm

.


How many people have not been re-deployed and how many have not got an ill health pension?


I don't know to be fair. All I've heard is anecdotal from some Fire Brigade friends who say people they've worked with have had their pension payout reduced through enforced early retirement.


Every line of work I've ever had has had reduced pension rights if you retire early, enforced or otherwise.

Even if the goalposts (or pension ages) are moved?


Edited by nickgusset (24 Feb 2015 7.53pm)


Well I got made redundant from a firm that had provided a defined benefit scheme, and now I'm in a defined contribution scheme which of course is much more market sensitive.

Neither scheme provides any accrued benefit for years you've not worked, whether that's through ill health or any other reason. I'd have been miles better off to still be in the defined benefit scheme though.

Why would you expect deferred pay for a time when you did not work for a company?


I wouldn't, I never worked in an industry that provided that kind of benefit, so why would any other worker expect it, if they've retired early per Nick's point?


The FBU's gripe is that because the retirement age for them has been raised, they are being forced into early retirement because they won't be fit enough at the new age and are being penalised for being made to retire early.
One would imagine that there was a reason why the retirement age was lower!


The same applies to all of us though doesn't it? Anyone born after 1978 will hasve to work until they are 68 before they get their state pension for the same reason - we're living longer!

You're wasting your time with logic and common sense. My Dad still works as a gas engineer at 69, he's as fit as a fiddle, could go another 10. And yet the FBU would have you believe these firemen are ready for the knackers yard at 55.

The only lies are coming from the Union if you ask me

Hmm. Well if my house ever catches fire I certainly hope dad's army don't turn up to save it.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
moaner Flag Westerham 25 Feb 15 12.08am Send a Private Message to moaner Add moaner as a friend

Quote Pussay Patrol at 31 Oct 2014 7.57pm

Around bonfire time.

They won't reform on their pensions when everyone else has had to.

They are being told to work till 60 and they will still get a very generous pension when they retire which will be £26k a year when you add state pension. Any other worker would bite your hand off for such a pension deal. They want to keep their current cushy arrangement and expect the taxpayer to stump up the £600M funding gap. No, F-ck you, you reform like everyone else has had to.

I support the Nurses as 1% pay rise is a piss take, but the Firefighters pensions row is disgusting and I think the public would be at least divided and mostly unsupportive

Have you added the 2nd jobs or businesses many of them have. Perhaps the Straw and Rifkin rule should apply to them?

 


Everyone is entitled to my opinions

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
chris123 Flag hove actually 25 Feb 15 8.02am Send a Private Message to chris123 Add chris123 as a friend

Quote Pussay Patrol at 24 Feb 2015 11.04pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 9.46pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 9.39pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 9.15pm

Quote pefwin at 24 Feb 2015 8.58pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 8.06pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 7.53pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 7.51pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 7.47pm

Quote pefwin at 24 Feb 2015 7.25pm

Quote nickgusset at 23 Feb 2015 10.50pm

.


How many people have not been re-deployed and how many have not got an ill health pension?


I don't know to be fair. All I've heard is anecdotal from some Fire Brigade friends who say people they've worked with have had their pension payout reduced through enforced early retirement.


Every line of work I've ever had has had reduced pension rights if you retire early, enforced or otherwise.

Even if the goalposts (or pension ages) are moved?


Edited by nickgusset (24 Feb 2015 7.53pm)


Well I got made redundant from a firm that had provided a defined benefit scheme, and now I'm in a defined contribution scheme which of course is much more market sensitive.

Neither scheme provides any accrued benefit for years you've not worked, whether that's through ill health or any other reason. I'd have been miles better off to still be in the defined benefit scheme though.

Why would you expect deferred pay for a time when you did not work for a company?


I wouldn't, I never worked in an industry that provided that kind of benefit, so why would any other worker expect it, if they've retired early per Nick's point?


The FBU's gripe is that because the retirement age for them has been raised, they are being forced into early retirement because they won't be fit enough at the new age and are being penalised for being made to retire early.
One would imagine that there was a reason why the retirement age was lower!


The same applies to all of us though doesn't it? Anyone born after 1978 will hasve to work until they are 68 before they get their state pension for the same reason - we're living longer!

You're wasting your time with logic and common sense. My Dad still works as a gas engineer at 69, he's as fit as a fiddle, could go another 10. And yet the FBU would have you believe these firemen are ready for the knackers yard at 55.

The only lies are coming from the Union if you ask me


I'm just trying to work out why anyone would think the fire service are any different from anyone else in the land. In my co's now closed defined ben scheme you'd have to work 40 years to get 2/3 pension.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
sxp55 Flag South Norwood 25 Feb 15 8.04am Send a Private Message to sxp55 Add sxp55 as a friend

the last real fire was in 1666. we'll be alright....

 


@sxp55555

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 25 Feb 15 7.12pm

Quote chris123 at 25 Feb 2015 8.02am

Quote Pussay Patrol at 24 Feb 2015 11.04pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 9.46pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 9.39pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 9.15pm

Quote pefwin at 24 Feb 2015 8.58pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 8.06pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 7.53pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 7.51pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 7.47pm

Quote pefwin at 24 Feb 2015 7.25pm

Quote nickgusset at 23 Feb 2015 10.50pm

.


How many people have not been re-deployed and how many have not got an ill health pension?


I don't know to be fair. All I've heard is anecdotal from some Fire Brigade friends who say people they've worked with have had their pension payout reduced through enforced early retirement.


Every line of work I've ever had has had reduced pension rights if you retire early, enforced or otherwise.

Even if the goalposts (or pension ages) are moved?


Edited by nickgusset (24 Feb 2015 7.53pm)


Well I got made redundant from a firm that had provided a defined benefit scheme, and now I'm in a defined contribution scheme which of course is much more market sensitive.

Neither scheme provides any accrued benefit for years you've not worked, whether that's through ill health or any other reason. I'd have been miles better off to still be in the defined benefit scheme though.

Why would you expect deferred pay for a time when you did not work for a company?


I wouldn't, I never worked in an industry that provided that kind of benefit, so why would any other worker expect it, if they've retired early per Nick's point?


The FBU's gripe is that because the retirement age for them has been raised, they are being forced into early retirement because they won't be fit enough at the new age and are being penalised for being made to retire early.
One would imagine that there was a reason why the retirement age was lower!


The same applies to all of us though doesn't it? Anyone born after 1978 will hasve to work until they are 68 before they get their state pension for the same reason - we're living longer!

You're wasting your time with logic and common sense. My Dad still works as a gas engineer at 69, he's as fit as a fiddle, could go another 10. And yet the FBU would have you believe these firemen are ready for the knackers yard at 55.

The only lies are coming from the Union if you ask me


I'm just trying to work out why anyone would think the fire service are any different from anyone else in the land. In my co's now closed defined ben scheme you'd have to work 40 years to get 2/3 pension.


Totally different with statutory / quasi-statutory state schemes.

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 25 Feb 15 7.16pm

Thousands of firefighters brought parliament square to a standstill today. Did it make the news? Did it f***.

FB_IMG_1424891624748.jpg Attachment: FB_IMG_1424891624748.jpg (42.12Kb)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
nickgusset Flag Shizzlehurst 25 Feb 15 7.25pm

This is a booklet my fireman friend was given when he joined the service 20 years ago. The Government have effectively torn it up! That's why they're striking.

FB_IMG_1424892159435.jpg Attachment: FB_IMG_1424892159435.jpg (34.85Kb)

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
davidpercival Flag Croydon 25 Feb 15 7.50pm Send a Private Message to davidpercival Add davidpercival as a friend

Straw and Rifkind have exposed the hypocrisy of Labour and Tories. while they slash the terms and conditions of workers they line up jobs that pay them £5000 - £8000 a day.

I support all workers in fighting cuts made by and on behalf of the rich parasites who feed of us.

 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
pefwin Flag Where you have to have an English ... 25 Feb 15 7.56pm

Quote davidpercival at 25 Feb 2015 7.50pm

Straw and Rifkind have exposed the hypocrisy of Labour and Tories. while they slash the terms and conditions of workers they line up jobs that pay them £5000 - £8000 a day.

I support all workers in fighting cuts made by and on behalf of the rich parasites who feed of us.


There is nothing wrong with a person charging £5000 - £8000 a day for their services.

 


"Everything is air-droppable at least once."

"When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support."

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Quote this post in a reply
TUX Flag redhill 25 Feb 15 8.01pm Send a Private Message to TUX Add TUX as a friend

Quote chris123 at 25 Feb 2015 8.02am

Quote Pussay Patrol at 24 Feb 2015 11.04pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 9.46pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 9.39pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 9.15pm

Quote pefwin at 24 Feb 2015 8.58pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 8.06pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 7.53pm

Quote chris123 at 24 Feb 2015 7.51pm

Quote nickgusset at 24 Feb 2015 7.47pm

Quote pefwin at 24 Feb 2015 7.25pm

Quote nickgusset at 23 Feb 2015 10.50pm

.


How many people have not been re-deployed and how many have not got an ill health pension?


I don't know to be fair. All I've heard is anecdotal from some Fire Brigade friends who say people they've worked with have had their pension payout reduced through enforced early retirement.


Every line of work I've ever had has had reduced pension rights if you retire early, enforced or otherwise.

Even if the goalposts (or pension ages) are moved?


Edited by nickgusset (24 Feb 2015 7.53pm)


Well I got made redundant from a firm that had provided a defined benefit scheme, and now I'm in a defined contribution scheme which of course is much more market sensitive.

Neither scheme provides any accrued benefit for years you've not worked, whether that's through ill health or any other reason. I'd have been miles better off to still be in the defined benefit scheme though.

Why would you expect deferred pay for a time when you did not work for a company?


I wouldn't, I never worked in an industry that provided that kind of benefit, so why would any other worker expect it, if they've retired early per Nick's point?


The FBU's gripe is that because the retirement age for them has been raised, they are being forced into early retirement because they won't be fit enough at the new age and are being penalised for being made to retire early.
One would imagine that there was a reason why the retirement age was lower!


The same applies to all of us though doesn't it? Anyone born after 1978 will hasve to work until they are 68 before they get their state pension for the same reason - we're living longer!

You're wasting your time with logic and common sense. My Dad still works as a gas engineer at 69, he's as fit as a fiddle, could go another 10. And yet the FBU would have you believe these firemen are ready for the knackers yard at 55.

The only lies are coming from the Union if you ask me


I'm just trying to work out why anyone would think the fire service are any different from anyone else in the land. In my co's now closed defined ben scheme you'd have to work 40 years to get 2/3 pension.

I doubt many do tbh.
If 'others' had a union to highlight any issues then I'm sure we'd all be equally sympathetic.
It's a shame that many 'others' don't have this particular outlet because if they did then what appears to be jealousy would soon disappear, hopefully.

News just in..........700,000 of the working population are now said to be on zero hour contracts.

Thoughts?


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply
TUX Flag redhill 25 Feb 15 8.11pm Send a Private Message to TUX Add TUX as a friend

Quote nickgusset at 25 Feb 2015 7.16pm

Thousands of firefighters brought parliament square to a standstill today. Did it make the news? Did it f***.

No mention of it on LBC today either (from what I heard). Media manipulation from those above?


 

Alert Alert a moderator to this post Edit this post Quote this post in a reply

  

Page 11 of 12 < 7 8 9 10 11 12 >

Previous Topic | Next Topic

You are here: Home > Message Board > News & Politics > Selfish Firefighters on Strike