This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 04 Jul 24 11.30am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines
Thank you for clarifying my state of mind. Unfortunately Starmer wants to rid the possible deterrent of Rwanda and negotiate with France...which will take how long? The Rwanda scheme has been passed through both Houses, numerous appeals and is ready to go. Exhaust that route first whilst negotiating. You don't sell your car and then wait 6 months for your new one to arrive. Don't move the goalposts now - you said "they (Labour) are not against free movement of migrants from across the channel" - which is clearly untrue. The Rwanda scheme is not 'ready to go' - it's a childish, illegal, dog-whistle of a policy and I still find it staggering that it's taken remotely seriously as an idea. It will never happen.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
EverybodyDannsNow SE19 04 Jul 24 11.34am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
I thought I would provide a Link before I continue with my arduous tasks on Election Day. Now I'm really convinced - some big red letters and tabloid headlines.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 04 Jul 24 11.35am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Behind Enemy Lines
When Sky or the BBC (I can't remember which) did a rundown of each or the parties views on immigration, The Greens were reported as not believing in any borders and believe that migration is not an offence under any circumstances. As for the naivety of people who believe that the Rwanda deterrent would not work; no deterrent at all is not the answer. Starmer is from the legal profession. His mates can rack up some hefty bills for the UK Government whilst the next wave of migrants fight their cases here in the UK, rather than enjoying the sunshine in Rwanda. I may stand corrected on the Greens, but the suggestion that Starmer will let the hordes flood in to create a beano for his mates in the legal profession is barrel-scraping conspiratorial tosh. Any party that seeks to reduce state pensions, effects clear reductions in funding to the NHS, seeks a return to the EU, or demonstrates a laissez faire attitude to immigration will not be in power for long. Starmer may be many things but he ain't dumb.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 04 Jul 24 11.41am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Now I'm really convinced - some big red letters and tabloid headlines. There is nothing for him to stop. How can he stop something "even if it works" if it will never happen? It was never going to [ahem] take off. Just like national service and the promise on the bus. An insult to the intelligence of the electorate. Do they really think people are that stupid?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 04 Jul 24 11.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Willo
I thought I would provide a Link before I continue with my arduous tasks on Election Day. Is this really all the Tories have left to offer? Dire situation when even the blinkered fanatics have run out of ideas.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 04 Jul 24 12.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Don't move the goalposts now - you said "they (Labour) are not against free movement of migrants from across the channel" - which is clearly untrue. The Rwanda scheme is not 'ready to go' - it's a childish, illegal, dog-whistle of a policy and I still find it staggering that it's taken remotely seriously as an idea. It will never happen. It's also insanely expensive. A colossal waste of money on what accounts for 4% of the total intake. (~0.05m). Measly. Could and should have been much better spent on trying to resolve the actual issue of lowering the volume of legal migration, which accounts for 96% (~1.2m). Massive.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
silvertop Portishead 04 Jul 24 12.06pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Don't move the goalposts now - you said "they (Labour) are not against free movement of migrants from across the channel" - which is clearly untrue. The Rwanda scheme is not 'ready to go' - it's a childish, illegal, dog-whistle of a policy and I still find it staggering that it's taken remotely seriously as an idea. It will never happen. In all fairness I think people were just desperate to see it stop. The Tories realized it was a good central pledge to be judged on... but then further realized that the French won't take them back and there wasn't nearly enough cash in the kitty to provide an effective policy. So.... They dreamed up this scheme based on an Australian concept to appeal to their base. It worked down under as the Ozzies had places to turn the boats back to, other than sending them to "containment camps" in PNG or Nauru. We have France. Not negotiating with the French is madness. Then again, we will be negotiating with the far right anti immigration government you guys love and respect so much. Not a chance in a million that lot will take so much as one migrant back. The Australians said they will never allow any illegal boat people to permanently settle in Australia. That includes any genuine asylum seekers from e.g. Burma. I am pretty sure the UK would never introduce such an illegal law. There is some kernel of an idea. All boat people are immediately taken from their boat to the airport and Rwanda containment camps. Their applications are processed there. If they are successful, they are returned to the UK for settlement. Otherwise..? I'm actually unsure. Let out the gate and released into downtown Kigali. Given a bus ticket back to Kabul? Humanely disposed of?
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Behind Enemy Lines Sussex 04 Jul 24 12.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by silvertop
In all fairness I think people were just desperate to see it stop. The Tories realized it was a good central pledge to be judged on... but then further realized that the French won't take them back and there wasn't nearly enough cash in the kitty to provide an effective policy. So.... They dreamed up this scheme based on an Australian concept to appeal to their base. It worked down under as the Ozzies had places to turn the boats back to, other than sending them to "containment camps" in PNG or Nauru. We have France. Not negotiating with the French is madness. Then again, we will be negotiating with the far right anti immigration government you guys love and respect so much. Not a chance in a million that lot will take so much as one migrant back. The Australians said they will never allow any illegal boat people to permanently settle in Australia. That includes any genuine asylum seekers from e.g. Burma. I am pretty sure the UK would never introduce such an illegal law. There is some kernel of an idea. All boat people are immediately taken from their boat to the airport and Rwanda containment camps. Their applications are processed there. If they are successful, they are returned to the UK for settlement. Otherwise..? I'm actually unsure. Let out the gate and released into downtown Kigali. Given a bus ticket back to Kabul? Humanely disposed of? Re your last para; my idea would be to keep the Rwanda scheme in situ and make it known that if you turn up with your passport, your claim is dealt with here. If no passport, then instant flight to Rwanda from Manston, Lydd or wherever. That way there is a chance that you dispense with a percentage of economic migrants that have no right to asylum. At the moment we have to treat both the genuine and chancer the same, which is clogging up the system and giving every one of them a bad name.
hats off to palace, they were always gonna be louder, and hate to say it but they were impressive ALL bouncing and singing. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Hrolf The Ganger 04 Jul 24 12.44pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by EverybodyDannsNow
Don't move the goalposts now - you said "they (Labour) are not against free movement of migrants from across the channel" - which is clearly untrue. The Rwanda scheme is not 'ready to go' - it's a childish, illegal, dog-whistle of a policy and I still find it staggering that it's taken remotely seriously as an idea. It will never happen. What drivel. It is the only kind of policy that will prevent Europe being over run by unwanted migrants. You offer no alternative, as usual.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
HKOwen Hong Kong 04 Jul 24 1.07pm | |
---|---|
All the pre election opinions basically history now, let's what actually changes over next 100, 200 days. Let's see how many returns France accepts after being talked to nicely. Exit poll will be interesting to see projections for HM opposition party.
Responsibility Deficit Disorder is a medical condition. Symptoms include inability to be corrected when wrong, false sense of superiority, desire to share personal info no else cares about, general hubris. It's a medical issue rather than pure arrogance. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
XKudu The Midlands, England 04 Jul 24 1.11pm | |
---|---|
I think the Labour victory will be just as great as the Tory victory at the last election. Parties get periodically thumped. It happens to them all. Big deal. People always then want a change and the other party gets in a few years down the road. The economy is improving so I don’t buy this Labour narrative that they’ll inherit a total bankrupt mess and won’t be able to do anything for years and years. Sounds like a preemptive excuse to me anticipating their own future failings and mismanagement. Talk about a defeatist attitude. They should be more positive. They have a real chance to do something. Ironically wasn’t it Labour that left the Tories with a truly bankrupt economy and a note saying “sorry there’s no money left” The Tories managed to turn things round so should Labour from an even stronger baseline. Edited by XKudu (04 Jul 2024 1.18pm)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
The Dolphin 04 Jul 24 1.18pm | |
---|---|
Pretty good post there XKudu.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.