During a time where there was footage of a policeman getting severely beaten to unconsciousness and one getting a fire extinguisher launched at his head and collapsing, and with bombs being planted (which you seemed unperturbed by) and people dying on the day, it's understandable that it was thought that a police officer had died due to something that happened on the day. No doubt some, myself included, made assumptions that down the road when an autopsy took place tuned out to be incorrect.

You're hardly someone who has found their way to a worldview based on a lack of misinformation.

You inferred what he was spending his money on when he was in the Philippines. They were ludicrous and entirely false inferences so yes I'm not surprised that you 'had no issue' with them being deleted. No matter anyones view on these topics, I've never seen anyone be so exploitative of them that they would use them just to get at someone they don't like.

You didn't 'make amends' or apologise for anything. Other people took action of your behalf due to you being unable to control your behaviour. Something of course that is not uncommon.

So as I was saying, yes misinformation. You'd know all about it.

I made a couple of jokes, on the comical number of people giving stick to Wiz. It wasn't an 'in' for you to have a pop, which you've done with every reply since.

Edited by BlueJay (19 May 2021 1.39pm)

Clearly in life, sometimes people state that they made a mistake, sometimes they don't. In saying that it's 'for the first time', it's again another little prod to get a reaction, with a healthy dollop of lack of self awareness thrown in .

As for your worldview, well okay. I'd say that I personally don't particularly care if peoples beliefs are a little... spicy. But I think you fall at an unfortunate spot where you quite often slag off 'normies' (aka the vast majority of people) for expressing typical views, and yet are aghast when people aren't ever embracing of whatever fringe spot you've drifted off to this week.

Not that it matters. It's self regulating really because people drift in or out on that basis. In any case, have a good day. A couple of little jokes were not supposed to be an 'in', so I'm out.

What a ridiculously juvenile thing to say. Essentially "the posts were deleted so although I actually admit it, you can't prove it now".

And I'm well aware that I'm wrong about the police officer. As already stated.

You really have caught this "globalism" infection very badly, haven't you? There is nothing I can say or do to help you overcome this. You need to come to recognise what nonsense it is yourself. Starting by avoiding some of the "information" (aka propaganda) sources you obviously frequent.

That capitalists seek to make money is the way capitalism works. It's up to the people we choose to represent us to ensure that their activities don't conflict with our best interests. That's the way democracy works. We are in control. Not some mythical elite.

It isn't perfect, but it's better than the alternatives. That's just the way it is. So best to stop moaning as it's a waste o time and energy and decide how to make it work well. Which starts with chooing the right representatives.

You are never going to change it

For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally.

This simply isn't true.

Bill Clinton had a mentor called Carroll Quigley who in the sixties wrote a book called 'Tragedy and hope : a history of the world in our time'. Quigley himself was an insider writing on the topic from researched archived files from the Council on Foreign Relations.

Your idea that the super rich don't conspire or have considerable influence is super naïve.

'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen)