This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
General Election 2017
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
nickgusset  Shizzlehurst 02 May 17 8.04am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
You are stating the obvious. But it is your assertion that the Tories are to blame for the debt which is yet another lie. You also criticise them for trying to manage the debt. That is dumb. What do you make of this then?
|
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
| hedgehog50 Croydon 02 May 17 8.11am |
|
|---|---|
|
Will the Local Elections on the 4th be an indicator as to the size of the rout that labour will suffer in the General Election?
We have now sunk to a depth at which the restatement of the obvious is the first duty of intelligent men. [Orwell] |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 matt_himself Matataland 02 May 17 8.19am |
  |
|---|---|
|
Did anyone else hear Diane Abbott's car crash interview on LBC this morning? When it is available will post it. It will scare you that the Shadow Home Secretary was talking.
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
 |
Y Ddraig Goch  In The Crowd 02 May 17 8.53am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
Ooh a communist flag at a may day rally. Fancy that. Why the extreme close up.
[Tweet Link]
May to be investigated by ethics committee? Not really going to do Corbyn any favours though is it? SWP & Communist Party cheering him on. As for May, that's a difficult one, it certainly isn't ideal having her husband working for Capital. BUT most senior politicians will have partners in jobs that could arguably benefit from them being in government. She has put her own investments in a blind trust, which is the correct thing to do, as for her husband, I am not sure what the answer is, should he quit his job? They could then both be unemployed in 5 weeks!
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Rudi Hedman Caterham 02 May 17 8.54am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matt_himself
Did anyone else hear Diane Abbott's car crash interview on LBC this morning? When it is available will post it. It will scare you that the Shadow Home Secretary was talking. I thought she only made whale sounds. The thing that irritates me most about her is when she's under pressure or wrong she lowers the volume of her speech to pour out more sententious garbage. She thinks she's tutoring the interviewer and viewers.
COYP |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| matt_himself Matataland 02 May 17 9.29am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matt_himself
Did anyone else hear Diane Abbott's car crash interview on LBC this morning? When it is available will post it. It will scare you that the Shadow Home Secretary was talking. Ladies and gentleman (both CIS and non-CIS), this is the Shadow Home Secretary spectacularly ballsing up explaining Labours 'flagship' Policing policy:
"That was fun and to round off the day, I am off to steal a charity collection box and then desecrate a place of worship.” - Smokey, The Selhurst Arms, 26/02/02 |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Y Ddraig Goch In The Crowd 02 May 17 9.40am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matt_himself
Ladies and gentleman (both CIS and non-CIS), this is the Shadow Home Secretary spectacularly ballsing up explaining Labours 'flagship' Policing policy: At first I thought she was having a bit of a moment that could happen to anyone. Then it just got progressively worse and worse
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
 Hrolf The Ganger 02 May 17 9.56am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by matt_himself
Ladies and gentleman (both CIS and non-CIS), this is the Shadow Home Secretary spectacularly ballsing up explaining Labours 'flagship' Policing policy: This is the primary reason why we can't have Labour. They are just not up to the job.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| JRW2 Dulwich 02 May 17 10.00am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
So this charade of the far left taking over the Labour party is soon to end. All they have done is ensure more years of Tory rule. I have mixed feelings....I'm a Ukipper and would actually like them to become a 'working class' party with certain right wing values....which I know is the direction Nuttall is going in. But give me the Tories every time over the CND idealogs who want to give up our nuclear option, beg that America protects us or throw themselves to the whims of Russia and China. There was an interesting article in The Observer suggesting that big losses by Labour would actually strengthen the left's influence in the party. According to the paper's analysis, the most left-wing Labour MPs have the biggest majorities and will therefore still be around and will account for a bigger proportion of the opposition than now. (If you can call it opposition, that is.)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 02 May 17 10.01am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by nickgusset
What do you make of this then? The bias of anything you post is always in question. The trouble for you is that people know that LAbour are not a party for middle England or even the average working man. They are more interested in minority interests and hippy trippy ideology.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
pefwin  Where you have to have an English ... 02 May 17 10.54am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
The bias of anything you post is always in question. The trouble for you is that people know that LAbour are not a party for middle England or even the average working man. They are more interested in minority interests and hippy trippy ideology. Come on you were debating UK lending not trippy ideology.
"Everything is air-droppable at least once." "When the going gets tough, the tough call for close air support." |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Hrolf The Ganger 02 May 17 11.04am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by pefwin
Come on you were debating UK lending not trippy ideology. We were discussing government borrowing actually but I'm not debating anything with you.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.