This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
US politics
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
 Stirlingsays  18 May 21 9.25am |
   |
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
As I have no interest at all in who supports me, or not, I fail to see the significance of that comment. That's like saying 'I'm a toaster' and I don't care what anyone else says. The loony bin is full of people making statements about themselves that have no relation to reality. We know why you do these pretenses and it's for the reactions.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
 Alert a moderator to this post |
  |
 Hrolf The Ganger 18 May 21 9.47am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Making any kind of claim without evidence cannot of itself be disproved. If you don't have the evidence to prove, you also don't have the evidence to disprove. That much is true. However, it's interesting that over the years that conspiracy theories have blossomed into something of the dangerous art form that they are today, not one of them, that I can recall, has ever subsequently been proven to have been true, or even partly true. This is then substantial circumstantial evidence to suggest, at the very least, a very high probability that the current ones are also untrue. I look for evidence to support assertions and have provided some to support mine. Finding evidence for 'conspiracy theories' is not like an archaeological dig, particularly if one party is deliberately trying to destroy or hide that evidence while those that are tasked with providing information are only interested in debunking one side of the argument. Evidence of vote rigging may never be found or properly exposed for that reason, but there is every reason to be suspicious of the voting patterns and every reason to suspect the media/Democrat/'illuminati' alliance that heavily miscalculated Trumps chances of winning the previous election and then were seemingly prepared to stop at nothing to see the back of him. You want to believe that everything was above board and that Trump is the Devil, then good luck. Add that to you list of delusions.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Lombardinho London 18 May 21 11.25pm |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Making any kind of claim without evidence cannot of itself be disproved. If you don't have the evidence to prove, you also don't have the evidence to disprove. That much is true. However, it's interesting that over the years that conspiracy theories have blossomed into something of the dangerous art form that they are today, not one of them, that I can recall, has ever subsequently been proven to have been true, or even partly true. This is then substantial circumstantial evidence to suggest, at the very least, a very high probability that the current ones are also untrue. I look for evidence to support assertions and have provided some to support mine.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
BlueJay  UK 19 May 21 12.40am |
|
|---|---|
|
I'm not sure that 25 people criticising one persons comments is quite enough. Maybe we can bring some more people in.
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 19 May 21 2.00am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by BlueJay
I'm not sure that 25 people criticising one persons comments is quite enough. Maybe we can bring some more people in. By the way it was misinformation that Trump supporters had killed that Police officer on January 6th. The autopsy showed that he died of heart issues hours later and had no physical injuries from earlier. So some posters were spreading disinformation....I notice that none of those people have addressed that fact. Ring a bell?
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| BlueJay UK 19 May 21 2.59am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
If you insist Edited by BlueJay (19 May 2021 3.41am)
|
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 19 May 21 8.50am |
|
|---|---|
|
Yeah, pretty much says it all.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 May 21 9.03am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
That's like saying 'I'm a toaster' and I don't care what anyone else says. The loony bin is full of people making statements about themselves that have no relation to reality. We know why you do these pretenses and it's for the reactions. I needed some more smiles this morning as the stress of my home move is never ending. So again, thanks. It's not that I don't care what people say. I care a lot about the opinions of those people I respect and admire, but that doesn't mean that I compromise my own as a consequence. Perhaps though you are unable to comprehend why that is, or even what it means. As you will know a lot more about the "loony bin" than me I submit to your superior experience over that. That you think you know why I am here is what made me smile. So thanks again.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 May 21 9.11am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Hrolf The Ganger
Finding evidence for 'conspiracy theories' is not like an archaeological dig, particularly if one party is deliberately trying to destroy or hide that evidence while those that are tasked with providing information are only interested in debunking one side of the argument. Evidence of vote rigging may never be found or properly exposed for that reason, but there is every reason to be suspicious of the voting patterns and every reason to suspect the media/Democrat/'illuminati' alliance that heavily miscalculated Trumps chances of winning the previous election and then were seemingly prepared to stop at nothing to see the back of him. You want to believe that everything was above board and that Trump is the Devil, then good luck. Add that to you list of delusions. That US politics can be a dirty business is undoubtedly true. So though is the improbability of any large scale conspiracy remaining undiscovered these days. With whistleblowing, investigative journalism and the prospect of fame and fortune so readily available it's going to be found out. There are more than enough suitably motivated outlets for such information. So if it was true then the proof would have been found by now. It hasn't. Therefore, the conclusion has to be that it is extremely unlikely that it ever will be and is therefore untrue. Scandal always leaks.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 May 21 9.14am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
What a joke! You start off but playing the game of definitions and 'who are you' to define it....and then you laughingly go onto defining your opinion on Tom's politics and undermine what you had just written. The lack of self awareness is out the park. Edited by Stirlingsays (18 May 2021 8.59am) I was responding to you!!!!
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Stirlingsays 19 May 21 9.18am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I was responding to you!!!! That makes no difference the point still stands. Though it is kind of weird why I've written Tom's name there, replace it with the word, 'my'. Edited by Stirlingsays (19 May 2021 9.19am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
| Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 19 May 21 9.22am |
|
|---|---|
|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
That is both factually and legally untrue. All you have are unproven contentions, which you spent years presenting as agreed facts. Provide evidence that without Barr's rulings that Mueller had some evidence on Trump collusion that would have convicted Trump. The Democrats literally spent years and millions on them and came up with nothing. You are a conspiracy theorist who can't walk it back. Edited by Stirlingsays (18 May 2021 9.10am) No-one other than Mueller, his team and the NY attorney has the evidence. It was redacted. Mueller's statement was enough. Barr's ruling scuppered any further action at that time. The "Democrats" weren't involved. Mueller's enquiry was initiated by Trump's own justice department. As predicted though, the squeeze on Trump is beginning to tighten. Not yet on Russia. Be patient.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
| Alert a moderator to this post |
|
Login / RegisterNew users
Registration is now on our new message board
Existing users
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
Sponsors
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.