This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 13 Dec 21 11.30pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Their fear mongering has lead to significant drops in staffing levels in the public sector....especially the NHS and that what's really behind it. The language they use won't identify their culpability though that fact is just the reality of it.....this new variant is just a convenient excuse. They have many people so scared now that if they told them to hop three times on one leg while singing 'Last Christmas' to save the NHS they would ask them what key.....not why the hell have you implemented policies that were inevitably going to lead to cratering staffing levels. Edited by Stirlingsays (13 Dec 2021 11.02pm) What a load of complete nonsense. There has been no "fear mongering" to begin with. There has been understandable caution and precautions taken to deal with worst case scenarios. Which is a whole lot more sensible than just winging it and hoping it will be OK. Your Mr Micawber approach, in that something good is bound to turn up, is no substitute for comprehensive preparations. There has been no staff drops as a consequence of this imaginary "fear-mongering". There has been a great deal of devoted hard work, long hours and extra shifts. All done to try to help people, many of whom who are presenting with Covid are like you, unvaccinated. Staff aren't leaving so much as seeking less stressful roles, or taking a break. The danger is also that if the infection rate surges, as forecast, that will impact NHS staff more than most, as they cannot work from home. The amount of crap that comes out of your mouth and fingers must mean your loo is redundant.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 13 Dec 21 11.38pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Canterbury Palace
My mother-in-law passed away from Covid pneumonia a month ago, her funeral was last Wednesday. As she was classed as vulnerable due to severe kidney issues, she barely left the house. She was double-vaccinated, as was every family member including me, despite my heavy reluctance to be jabbed. In the end I relented under great protest because my wife asked me to. My father-in-law caught the virus whilst working and passed it onto her and the rest of the family. He had the impression, from the government narrative, that being vaccinated protects you from spreading it. It does not. That the government have hoodwinked so many into perpetuating this bizarre notion that getting vaccinated is some romantic national duty akin to joining up in 1939 is utterly heinous. The only thing that pack of authoritarian c***s care about is turning us into a nation of biosecurity through the backdoor with Covid passports that will unequivocally be adapted to a wider use in the long term. You do not have a moral, social or national duty to get vaccinated and the NHS isn't overloaded because of Coronavirus, it's overloaded because the number of hospital beds in the UK has reduced from 240,000 to 160,000 since 2000. The only obligation you have is to yourself and, perhaps, your family. If that means relenting and getting the vaccine in the end then fair enough but don't do it because of Boris bloody Johnson. Being double vaccinated cut the mortality rate of Delta by 90%. Unfortunately a fair few people remain in that 10%, but it was still objectively completely the right thing to do to give your loved ones the best chance of fighting it off. Condolences that your mother in law didn't pull through, a great many vulnerable people are no doubt in the same position and it all becomes a bit of a hope for the best.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 13 Dec 21 11.44pm | |
---|---|
And as for Omicron realistically I think most of us will get it, and the vaccination campaign will cushion the blow somewhat. With something this virulent it would seem to be futile to do anything significant to stop it (lockdowns etc) on account that we'd exceptionally soon be in precisely the same situation as before. As in, if we somehow cut cases to 1000 after a lockdown, who cares when it would fly back up so soon. We're going to have to ride this one out. A combo of vaccines, some possible natural protection protection and hope that it's more mild is what we have to rely on.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 13 Dec 21 11.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Eaglecoops
Im reading more and more reports daily that the government are massively over reacting to the moronic, sorry omicron variant. Even the doctor who discovered the variant is saying that the vast majority of cases exhibit hardly any symptoms if any at all. I really do not understand the rhetoric which is bordering on hysterical at the moment. If it is purely to encourage vaccine take up then its sort of understandable but the scaremongering has been taken to a whole new level. The cynic in me says this is deflection by the government from their own crap they are currently wading through. I agree with some of this. It is certainly being overhyped by the media, more than the government anyway. At least that's my perception. The data coming from SA does not support the same level of panic as 18 months ago, but, I'd find it hard to argue that some action was required rather than none due to the delayed nature of how this all works its way through. Some precautions are required, based on what I can read up on, with a measured attitude to see what happens next. Certainly not histrionics which is what appears to be happening in the main. The amount of messages I've had today from people either testing positive or knowing someone that has shows it's starting to kick off. Again, hopefully the SA data is reflective of what might happen here and it won't last long before tapering off again. As for deflection, sure you could say it's convenient, I say it's lucky. At most the announcement of restrictions could have been brought forward to aid the cause but going further than that seems much less plausible to me for multiple reasons. The political penalty alone for ramping up restrictions again and everything else that goes with that is surely way more severe both within the party as well as outside it than spinning a few lines about Christmas parties that may or may not have occurred (note, Johnson is already moving from 'there were no rules broken' to 'I didn't break any rules' they definitely did occur). Of course the true ultra conspiracy theorists would probably be suggesting that he tried to pre-plan Carries due date so if anything did arise he had a bit of goodwill for insurance. Now that would be foresight. But Bojo doesn't strike me as a forward planning sort of guy.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 13 Dec 21 11.52pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Canterbury Palace
My mother-in-law passed away from Covid pneumonia a month ago, her funeral was last Wednesday. As she was classed as vulnerable due to severe kidney issues, she barely left the house. She was double-vaccinated, as was every family member including me, despite my heavy reluctance to be jabbed. In the end I relented under great protest because my wife asked me to. My father-in-law caught the virus whilst working and passed it onto her and the rest of the family. He had the impression, from the government narrative, that being vaccinated protects you from spreading it. It does not. That the government have hoodwinked so many into perpetuating this bizarre notion that getting vaccinated is some romantic national duty akin to joining up in 1939 is utterly heinous. The only thing that pack of authoritarian c***s care about is turning us into a nation of biosecurity through the backdoor with Covid passports that will unequivocally be adapted to a wider use in the long term. You do not have a moral, social or national duty to get vaccinated and the NHS isn't overloaded because of Coronavirus, it's overloaded because the number of hospital beds in the UK has reduced from 240,000 to 160,000 since 2000. The only obligation you have is to yourself and, perhaps, your family. If that means relenting and getting the vaccine in the end then fair enough but don't do it because of Boris bloody Johnson. I am obviously sorry to hear about your mother-in-law. Sounds like Covid was the final straw, and I hope your father-in-law is OK. Knowing he passed it on must be awful for him. It's unfortunate that people made the assumption that getting vaccinated meant they couldn't still get infected. I don't think that this has been made clear enough until fairly recently, but I think people are now understanding that, although it reduces the chances of infection, and protects against severe disease, you can still catch it and pass it on. Yours is therefore a very sad story to read. I don't though think the government encouraged that belief. They encouraged vaccination as a protection against severe disease but weren't strong enough about making sure you still distanced from those whose condition meant they remained vulnerable. You know I disagree with you over our moral obligation, as citizens, to all participate in the vaccination programme. I won't repeat why, but it has nothing to do with "Boris bloody Johnson". It's to do with everyone, and the need to ensure we have a functioning NHS to serve all our needs. I don't have any fear that this is back-door authoritarianism. If a bunch of Tory MPs are going to oppose this, then there's no chance any government would succeed in anything really Draconian. I'll leave it there.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Canterbury Palace Whitstable 13 Dec 21 11.55pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Being double vaccinated cut the mortality rate of Delta by 90%. Unfortunately a fair few people remain in that 10%, but it was still objectively completely the right thing to do to give your loved ones the best chance of fighting it off. Condolences that your mother in law didn't pull through, a great many vulnerable people are no doubt in the same position and it all becomes a bit of a hope for the best.
It's a fallacy and one being used to manipulate people into potentially having three doses of a vaccine which they do not get trust in a six month window under the guise of civic duty and enormous pressure which I think, in some quarters, is tantamount to bullying.
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 13 Dec 21 11.56pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
And as for Omicron realistically I think most of us will get it, and the vaccination campaign will cushion the blow somewhat. With something this virulent it would seem to be futile to do anything significant to stop it (lockdowns etc) on account that we'd exceptionally soon be in precisely the same situation as before. As in, if we somehow cut cases to 1000 after a lockdown, who cares when it would fly back up so soon. We're going to have to ride this one out. A combo of vaccines, some possible natural protection protection and hope that it's more mild is what we have to rely on. Yep. Also mainly agree. Further, if the govt lockdown again it'll be game over for BoJo so it would need to be something demonstrably drastic for that to occur. And the data seems to suggest otherwise, right now anyway. Personally can't see how people are going to be able to avoid it, if it is both vaccine evasive (latest data reckons 5 times more so) and highly infectious. Symptomatically or otherwise. Proof will be in the pudding, or lack of it, this year. I'm actually optimistic rather than pessimistic it feels like the last hurrah for the virus, provided proper plans are put in place for being prepared next winter, and every winter, like we have done for flu since the 1960s. If they don't, all hell will break loose, and rightly so. Don't forget the influenza pandemic lasted 2 years, and that was in 1918 without mass population, global trade and travel. So we're not doing that badly.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 14 Dec 21 12.05am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Canterbury Palace
It's a fallacy and one being used to manipulate people into potentially having three doses of a vaccine which they do not get trust in a six month window under the guise of civic duty and enormous pressure which I think, in some quarters, is tantamount to bullying. It has been shown to impact spread somewhat, but I completely agree that 'somewhat' really isn't a consolation when it does. The messaging put out early days definitely didn't highlight this enough. Realistically the vaccine has reliably cut severity (through T cell immunity etc) but as variants change it's ability to slow the spread weakens, and we can expect Omicron to be the real cherry on the cake there. As in the vaccine may still be a life saver to many but in terms of not catching it in the first place, I bet it will end up making little difference. Time will tell. You're right to make people aware of this as any false sense of security can be dangerous when around vulnerable people (though its still important that vulnerable people especially do get vaccinated). Sorry for your family, and especially the cruel hand your father in law was dealt in terms of passing it on.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 14 Dec 21 12.08am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Canterbury Palace
It's a fallacy and one being used to manipulate people into potentially having three doses of a vaccine which they do not get trust in a six month window under the guise of civic duty and enormous pressure which I think, in some quarters, is tantamount to bullying. You're right, it doesn't prevent the spread. But from the data it does create a lower chance of it spreading, and with reduced severity (lower viral load). And yes I've heard of plenty of people thinking it does make them invincible but whenever that's mentioned I make it pretty clear that as far as I'm aware it's not, and has never been the case. The same goes for masks... wearing one does not mean you or others are safe. As before especially if it's your old tdeatowel. That said I don't recall ever being told from an official communication that vaccines make you immune. I do think that they cocked up big time re. comms over masks it should have been made clear that there was a minimum standard for some protection, rather than giving the impression that all masks are equal. Maybe both should have been made clearer somehow but in my opinion the lack of proper mask education has been much more impactful. Vaccination, of course, has benefits (previous to this strain, more so) reduction in the severity of symptoms, or elimination of them entirely. This in turn reduces the amount of hospitalisations and viral load which in turn reduces the size of dose you get when coming into contact with someone infectious, which in turn reduces the severity. That's obviously not the case for all interactions, but it's pretty safe to assume that without it we'd be waiting a very long time to get out of this cycle and the general impact would be far more severe, and for much longer.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 14 Dec 21 12.13am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Yep. Also mainly agree. Further, if the govt lockdown again it'll be game over for BoJo so it would need to be something demonstrably drastic for that to occur. And the data seems to suggest otherwise, right now anyway. Personally can't see how people are going to be able to avoid it, if it is both vaccine evasive (latest data reckons 5 times more so) and highly infectious. Symptomatically or otherwise. Proof will be in the pudding, or lack of it, this year. I'm actually optimistic rather than pessimistic it feels like the last hurrah for the virus, provided proper plans are put in place for being prepared next winter, and every winter, like we have done for flu since the 1960s. If they don't, all hell will break loose, and rightly so. Don't forget the influenza pandemic lasted 2 years, and that was in 1918 without mass population, global trade and travel. So we're not doing that badly. I'm still not sure what to make of how this will pan out, but with the booster campaign, significant natural infection (which may offer 'some' protection) and rumours of Omicron being more mild, perhaps it's not the worst position to be in... and with it being this virulent maybe even a huge leap in cases might be a bump in the road that leads to wider immunity. I'm not sure we have much of a choice but to hope for the best!
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Canterbury Palace Whitstable 14 Dec 21 12.16am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
I am obviously sorry to hear about your mother-in-law. Sounds like Covid was the final straw, and I hope your father-in-law is OK. Knowing he passed it on must be awful for him. It's unfortunate that people made the assumption that getting vaccinated meant they couldn't still get infected. I don't think that this has been made clear enough until fairly recently, but I think people are now understanding that, although it reduces the chances of infection, and protects against severe disease, you can still catch it and pass it on. Yours is therefore a very sad story to read. I don't though think the government encouraged that belief. They encouraged vaccination as a protection against severe disease but weren't strong enough about making sure you still distanced from those whose condition meant they remained vulnerable. You know I disagree with you over our moral obligation, as citizens, to all participate in the vaccination programme. I won't repeat why, but it has nothing to do with "Boris bloody Johnson". It's to do with everyone, and the need to ensure we have a functioning NHS to serve all our needs. I don't have any fear that this is back-door authoritarianism. If a bunch of Tory MPs are going to oppose this, then there's no chance any government would succeed in anything really Draconian. I'll leave it there.
I do disagree that the government haven't encouraged that belief and think the entire notion of vaccine passports is founded on the principle of unvaccinated people posing a threat to your health, which surely implies that vaccinated people do not. Sadly my mother-in-law was only in her early 60s and, despite her ill-health, probably would have had a decade at least left. We all knew that if and when she caught it she would probably struggle to survive though and it was for that reason that she stopped leaving the house and was only exposed to the vaccinated. It was, sadly, a horrific death. She effectively suffocated over a number of days as her lungs gradually failed and she had blood pouring from her mouth, nose and ears and she drew her final, laboured breaths. We have two young children and I think the hardest thing for my wife and her siblings to process, other than those haunting final moments, is that she will never see them grow up, it's been heartbreaking to see them suffer that grief. To be honest I'm just very pissed off at the moment. Angry that so many people must be going through similar things and even angrier that this government are seemingly using it a means of exploiting the nation to gain greater control and erode our rights and freedoms. That's why I won't buy into the narrative of vaccination being a heroic gesture, it's coercive control on a mass scale.
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Canterbury Palace Whitstable 14 Dec 21 12.22am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
It has been shown to impact spread somewhat, but I completely agree that 'somewhat' really isn't a consolation when it does. The messaging put out early days definitely didn't highlight this enough. Realistically the vaccine has reliably cut severity (through T cell immunity etc) but as variants change it's ability to slow the spread weakens, and we can expect Omicron to be the real cherry on the cake there. As in the vaccine may still be a life saver to many but in terms of not catching it in the first place, I bet it will end up making little difference. Time will tell. You're right to make people aware of this as any false sense of security can be dangerous when around vulnerable people (though its still important that vulnerable people especially do get vaccinated). Sorry for your family, and especially the cruel hand your father in law was dealt in terms of passing it on.
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the drugs began to take hold... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.