This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
eaglesdare 12 Dec 21 2.09pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Because a lot of them still have large enough percentages of vulnerable either unvaccinated or partially vaccinated, which is driving up hospitalisations. We are lucky that our programme has been implemented so swiftly and to so many. Ireland is 96 percent vaccinated adults! And it's lockdown and tough restrictions! Even with 100 percent vaxxed it will still be the same over and over and over and over again! New variant this new variant that omg the cases are up let's panic! At the end of the day it's silly carry on now! Soon everyone will have a vaccine card, stamped Everytime you take it and then 10th one free! Laughable! And don't think for a second that it will be free in the next few years! They will charge a fortune for your mandatory shot so that you can live a "normal" life
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 12 Dec 21 2.40pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I know this latest line of thought from you is utterly ridiculous of course but before I stop posting at you I couldn't help but comment on this sentence....it's something that comes right out of certain far right belief systems...Made me smile. Edited by Stirlingsays (12 Dec 2021 8.34am) Don't be silly! I don't read, let alone subscribe to such systems. It comes out of my own thinking! Unlike most of yours, which seem to originate in Moscow and arrive via YouTube. Edited by Wisbech Eagle (12 Dec 2021 8.52pm)
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 12 Dec 21 2.45pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
When or if omicron overtakes Delta as the dominant variant they may as well get rid of these infection control procedures limiting bed capacity. If it spreads anyway and is treatable in hospital then they might as well. But by then the pressure might have eased. I suspect they will still need to flatten the curve as much as possible, until things become clearer.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Wisbech Eagle Truro Cornwall 12 Dec 21 3.01pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by ASCPFC
Hopefully, because we have passed the point where the cure is worse than the disease. To clarify this for the brain washed, far more people are dying now because of restrictions than dying from the virus. I have no idea why you make that assertion, or how you reach it. It's not the point, though. The current death rate is low, because of the vaccinations and mask wearing etc. The restrictions now being imposed are to try to flatten out, as much as possible, the expected surge in hospitalisations, which could easily overwhelm the NHS's capacity to deal with them, thus resulting in avoidable deaths. Additionally, there is likely to have to be another pause in elective surgery, to free up capacity and staff. It's all very regrettable, but it's the least worst option. Once over, we need to focus on getting the developing world vaccinated, because that's where the variants will mutate and extend the pandemic. Convincing those people that the vaccines are safe and necessary isn't helped by people in the developed world spreading misinformation.
For the avoidance of doubt any comments in response to a previous post are directed to its ideas and not at any, or all, posters personally. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 12 Dec 21 3.54pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Mapletree
I wouldn’t arm wrestle a gorilla either Silver is my favourite colour too.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 12 Dec 21 4.05pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
It’s a lazy answer but It was time for bed and I didn’t fancy concisely summarising data for someone who clearly doesn’t read around the topic for the upteenth time. It provides an answer to the question around ‘mild’ (not as straightforward as it appears) rather than GET A VACCINE I think they want to focus upon the unvaccinated when the real focus should be on NHS staffing levels and how they have mishandled them. Less people in hospital than there were in October....there has been a severe lack of governmental and institutional flexibility. If it's a matter of equipment or beds, which I doubt, we have shown the capacity to quickly respond to that....if it's numbers of staff we have both ex staff and army medical core that can be reallocated, plus we have had a lot of time for specific training rather than the ridiculous 'degree' requirement for nurses. It all seems to be handled pretty poorly.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Vaibow vancouver/croydon 12 Dec 21 4.17pm | |
---|---|
You sound like a dictator... no, we should not be taking medication for the good of others - once the government have that power, that new line.... it's disaster... you don't get it.. that's fine. Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
No we shouldn't. We should welcome it with open arms. The unvaccinated have a very simple answer in their own hands. Or more accurately, in their own arms. These vaccines were known to be safe even before they were released, because the scientific basis for that was well established. That didn't stop trials being run, primarily to reassure people, not because of any doubt. The Australian showed a rare side effect and was withdrawn. The AZ has an even rarer side effect and has not been given to children. Now we have huge amounts of real time experience that they are very safe and only producing the kind of rare side effects that all drugs do. When the benefits outweigh the negatives by such enormous factors, then deciding to use them is a no brainer. We aren't "stopping perfectly healthy people from living their lives"! We are trying to make sure that all the people CAN live their lives, and expecting them to participate in the vaccine programme is their contribution to our collective effort. It's not much to ask, is it? If some refuse, then there will be a cost. Both to protect the rest of us and the NHS and to exert pressure on them to join in. The purpose isn't to punish anyone. It is to encourage vaccination and, if that fails, coerce them into doing so. Vaccine producers have acted pretty responsibly in my view. AZ are supplying the developing world at cost. The others worked incredibly hard and fast. Of course, they will earn money. That is the nature of commerce, and acting fast and being first is a benefit to everyone. So the next time this happens they have the incentives, and investments, in place to be ready to respond quickly and save your life.
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Vaibow vancouver/croydon 12 Dec 21 4.24pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by The Dolphin
If you don't get vaccinated - You could... chances are you won't. You could, however, stop drinking alcohol, eating sugar, fast food, you could be way more healthy...we all could... that would drastically reduce the amount of patience waiting to be seen.. You don't get it do you? The health care system is at breaking point every winter, why?? no investment... poor lifestyle choices, government decisions that hinder a healthy life. There are those that want to be spoon fed by the government, they want their hand held... I get that.. there are those addicted to the fear p***... I get that.. But when those in power, tell us to stay in, for fear of a virus that will ruin society.... as they themselves party... not afraid to catch it..
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Vaibow vancouver/croydon 12 Dec 21 4.32pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I think they want to focus upon the unvaccinated when the real focus should be on NHS staffing levels and how they have mishandled them. Less people in hospital than there were in October....there has been a severe lack of governmental and institutional flexibility. If it's a matter of equipment or beds, which I doubt, we have shown the capacity to quickly respond to that....if it's numbers of staff we have both ex staff and army medical core that can be reallocated, plus we have had a lot of time for specific training rather than the ridiculous 'degree' requirement for nurses. It all seems to be handled pretty poorly. Spot on.. and it's lazy to blame the unjabbed... the majority of the unjabbed are very healthy people, who have researched more than most. I feel a lot of people just don't like the fact they buckled and said yes to something they just don't need... and are jealous of those that are fine, perfectly healthy and have control of their lives... think about, who is more free? The person who did what they were told and continue to, or those that said no and live by their own rules?
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 12 Dec 21 4.49pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Vaibow
Spot on.. and it's lazy to blame the unjabbed... the majority of the unjabbed are very healthy people, who have researched more than most. I feel a lot of people just don't like the fact they buckled and said yes to something they just don't need... and are jealous of those that are fine, perfectly healthy and have control of their lives... think about, who is more free? The person who did what they were told and continue to, or those that said no and live by their own rules? Fully agree. The idea that because you choose to not take a vaccine you are suddenly demonised is really a little concerning. I've never criticised people (only coercion...especially of the young) for choosing to take a vaccine because free choice has been a fundamental part of being English for centuries now. Instead, the speed at which people can turn speaks to what fear and its mongering can do when it's directed. You'd like it if some could pull their punches a bit with the language and that's not me saying they should change their opinion.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Vaibow vancouver/croydon 12 Dec 21 4.50pm | |
---|---|
Here's something... from Monday, those double jabbed will need to take a LF test for 7 days if in contact with a positive case. Unjabbed, 10 days. The difference a jab gives you is a 3 day reprieve. laughable.
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Vaibow vancouver/croydon 12 Dec 21 4.51pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Fully agree. The idea that because you choose to not take a vaccine you are suddenly demonised is really a little concerning. I've never criticised people (only coercion...especially of the young) for choosing to take a vaccine because free choice has been a fundamental part of being English for centuries now. Instead, the speed at which people can turn speaks to what fear and its mongering can do when it's directed. You'd like it if some could pull their punches a bit with the language and that's not me saying they should change their opinion. nothing to fear, but fear itself. Edited by Stirlingsays (12 Dec 2021 4.50pm)
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.