This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Stirlingsays 10 Dec 21 12.25pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by DanH
You are you to intellectualism what Rik Waller is to marathon running. Edited by DanH (10 Dec 2021 9.56am) I take the p1ss out of you lot and you start using the same joke structure......frigging invention potential of a boyband. I've never claimed airs and graces, I come from the council estates, you're the middle class one with two cars and an Ali G fixation.....Allied with the deductive capacity of an overly stressed office tea maker. Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Dec 2021 12.27pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
georgenorman 10 Dec 21 12.28pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Scare mongering assertions like that are worthless diversions from the need to attend to the needs of today. You seem the sort who would have argued against seat belts because they were a government interfering in personal liberty and a precursor for "state control". Comparing seatbelts to discrimination against people who want control over what is injected into their bodies is laughable - as is your dismissal of encroaching state control over more and more aspects of our lives.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 10 Dec 21 12.35pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
Scare mongering assertions like that are worthless diversions from the need to attend to the needs of today. You seem the sort who would have argued against seat belts because they were a government interfering in personal liberty and a precursor for "state control". They are. However, unlike the government's assault on businesses, employment and personal movement the seatbelt law gives no inherent power to the state over the individual outside of the car. For you to talk about others scare mongering is a joke. You must spend half your time on this platform doing little else. If it wasn't so fake I'd think you scared to dress yourself for fear of straining a muscle. Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Dec 2021 12.36pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 10 Dec 21 12.42pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
No it isn't! The Chinese system's purpose is to encourage people to obey their laws and conform to social norms. The impact is solely on them. The purpose of our vaccine passports and restrictions is to protect others from those who refuse to do what's asked of them. It isn't to punish those people. The impact is on society as a whole. No it isn't. There are less people in hospital now than there were in October. I make no claim of certainty but I've been hearing down the grapevine that this is due to crises NHS staffing levels due to their own poor handling of this....it unsurprisingly turns out that when you push to make everyone sh1t scared that your public workers don't want to deal with Joe Public so much. Apparently this has nothing to do with waiting and seeing over variants and was pre-planned. Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Dec 2021 1.55pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eaglesdare 10 Dec 21 1.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Wisbech Eagle
It seems so. Not at the game, perhaps, but in the bigger picture. Best you get vaccinated and avoid it. no thank you
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 10 Dec 21 2.18pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Dec 2021 2.34am) Yes, I can see why someone would draw that conclusion, and the vast majorly will be entirely unbothered by it. I'm just pointing out that any remote negatives stating about vaccinations is children is likely still overshadowed by the actually getting covid instead, and so that there is also a logic to doing things in a certain order if people wish to.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 10 Dec 21 2.33pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
Yes, I can see why someone would draw that conclusion, and the vast majorly will be entirely unbothered by it. I'm just pointing out that any remote negatives stating about vaccinations is children is likely still overshadowed by the actually getting covid instead, and so that there is also a logic to doing things in a certain order if people wish to. I think if you feel that the risk to non immune vulnerable children (and I'm including older than children in this) of catching covid is worse than the unknown long term effects of these vaccines then I guess that's your judgement. The state certainly has taken a firm unyielding position on it....so much so as to insist that their medical committee's view on younger age bands was not accepted and they were told to go away and come back with conclusions that they agreed with....absurdly taking into account non medical factors. I'm with the surgeon's view personally for all those reasons stated.....these are unnecessary and some might say irrational risks. However, I accept that at this time, my view and that of others, is a minority one.
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 10 Dec 21 2.39pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Vaibow
Hospitalisations?? We are doing this to keep people out of beds? Ok, here's an idea to keep people out of beds. Ban cigarette sales, limit alcohol consumption, lower sugar and salt content in food - have the media do a daily roll call on exercise, vitamin D, zinc. Subsidize organic, local food - teach kids to eat proper food, to make proper food. Make gyms free. Improve mental health facilities. While it's clearly a good idea for people to make sensible lifestyle choices, they are where they are in that moment. Yes we should put measures in place to help people with addiction, weight loss, mental health and the like (and do, but in an insufficient way), but these aren't a 'click your fingers' job, whereas to an extent getting people vaccinated has been so far in terms of a massive impact of jabs keeping people out of hospital. People who would've been flying through the hospital doors in their many thousands as emergencies, which makes it a unique situation in contrast to these other health issues. The ease of getting vaccinated, puts it in stark contrast to the time in takes to resolve other concerns - it takes seconds. If people hadn't been vaccinated in vast numbers hospitals would be in a worse position. Clearly in this moment by far the very best thing to do to keep people out of hospital beds is vaccination, rather than taking a packet of cigs off someone or telling them not to eat a burger. 73% of intensive care unit admissions with Covid involve unvaccinated people, which is quite staggering considering the vastly disproportionate number of people in vaccinated groups. In any case suspicion of the government, and government control is one of the key reasons a minority are put off getting vaccinated, so if your alternative plan is banning cigarettes and limiting alcohol consumption you bump into that same problem anyway.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 10 Dec 21 2.41pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I think if you feel that the risk to non immune vulnerable children (and I'm including older than children in this) of catching covid is worse than the unknown long term effects of these vaccines then I guess that's your judgement. The state certainly has taken a firm unyielding position on it....so much so as to insist that their medical committee's view on younger age bands was not accepted and they were told to go away and come back with conclusions that they agreed with....absurdly taking into account non medical factors. I'm with the surgeon's view personally for all those reasons stated.....these are unnecessary and some might say irrational risks. However, I accept that at this time my view and that of others is a minority one.
Well yes as I say I don't agree with any consequences, especially to children of not getting vaccinated, so would not agree with that happening by any means.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 10 Dec 21 2.48pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by eaglesdare
So at the game on sunday. I can sit next to a fully vaccinated person who did not need a covid test and is positive for covid? Yet theres me unvaccinated but will take at least 2 tests before the game. And I am the problem? True, but in all likelihood you're both going to get it anyway soon. Only being vaccinated will likely put that individual in a much better position statistically. You're possibly young enough that it won't impact you as much anyway, so you'll probably be lucky. It's unvaccinated people in intensive care for the most part though, so it fair to say that that is more of a problem yes.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 10 Dec 21 3.13pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
In any case suspicion of the government, and government control is one of the key reasons a minority are put off getting vaccinated, so if your alternative plan is banning cigarettes and limiting alcohol consumption you bump into that same problem anyway. Governments have effectively been moving towards both of those anyway. Being suspicious of government is....at this point....just taking notice. I think we both agree to this extent anyway. I'm not against government looking towards policies to improve health (though making smokes and drink expensive only restricts the poor...so I don't like that method). For example I have no criticism of you encouraging adults along what you think are the better actions for their health....that's your basic liberty. However, what I think we are both against are mandatory routes.....where the state compels people under their legally privileged access to force....a nice way of saying violence. Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Dec 2021 3.15pm)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
eaglesdare 10 Dec 21 3.43pm | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
True, but in all likelihood you're both going to get it anyway soon. Only being vaccinated will likely put that individual in a much better position statistically. You're possibly young enough that it won't impact you as much anyway, so you'll probably be lucky. It's unvaccinated people in intensive care for the most part though, so it fair to say that that is more of a problem yes.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.