This page is no longer updated, and is the old forum. For new topics visit the New HOL forum.
Register | Edit Profile | Subscriptions | Forum Rules | Log In
Tim Gypsy Hill '64 Stoke sub normal 10 Dec 21 12.49am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
You talk utter rubbish. I was about to call you out for blatant lying regarding your stance on vaccine safety by searching back but BlueJay has kindly done this for me. Please search back. Then apologise. You didn't even realise that FFP2 and N95 are the same. So who is talking rubbish?
Systematically dragged down by the lawmakers |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 10 Dec 21 12.54am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Rudi Hedman
I think this one answers the question on how genuine the SA case numbers are. Hopefully none of this will be problematic, but I wouldn’t count on it if I was in the position hoping rather than knowing. [Tweet Link] He’s an excellent source. Check his latest stuff though… it’s not all doom and gloom. Anecdotal stuff I’m hearing via the medical community is that it’s insanely contagious, but no serious red flags in terms of illness, which chimes with some reporting but not all. I’m personally pretty convinced this will be ‘over’ by Jan and these new restrictions are as far as it goes. But that’s based on a hunch looking through contrasting early data and anecdotal evidence. In 2-3 weeks we’ll know for sure.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 10 Dec 21 12.58am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
It's hardly strange for someone to make their own healthcare decisions. Many people don't take up the flu vaccine even though they may not be particularly against it. Natural immunity is in of itself stronger than any individual vaccine and there will always be people not wishing to commitment themselves to a lifestyle and lifetime of vaccine jabs....the kill ratio being particularly low.....especially when it encourages the state to use it for the basis of many extremely insidious policies. People naturally want to fall into all or nothing groups, which rarely reflects reality. If you want to take the vaccine for others and wear your high quality mask for others then I have a certain amount of respect for that. However, we all make our own decisions....well, some aren't really being given practical choices and there's a lot of people shrugging their shoulders over that. Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Dec 2021 12.38am) RE: natural infection vs vaccination, there are significant strengths and differences to both that make it hard to state compare. They certainly complement one another very well though in terms of covering all the bases. A very important factor surely is that vaccination is proven to radically cushion the blow of covid in adults, hence it's objectively the better health choice to make prior to catching it. People are perfectly able to make their own health decisions though yes, good or bad. Also, in saying that having covid doses and a booster relates to doing this for a lifetime I don't see that as being true either. There may be a political push for it, but from a scientific perspective getting vaccinated puts you in a very good position in you contract covid, which I would argue is very likely for most of us.. and when that happens, getting covid will also offer additional immunity and so on. So even if people do opt out of regular vaccination in future, they will likely retain significant ongoing immunity, which I was under the impression is in the interests of us all. That said, in especially vulnerable groups, much like the flu jab it would seem to be sensible to continue with jabs that are best aligned with whatever variant is facing them, especially if it may have something of a kick to it. I understand that fears of mandatory vaccinations and the like may worry some. I don't think that should ever happen and am only commenting from a perspective of what I see as being the best health choices to make as an individual and for society at this time.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 10 Dec 21 1.10am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Why is it that you still cannot understand the difference between 'not safe' and 'unsafe'? A new vaccine cannot be deemed safe until such time as all factors are met, as in Thalidomide (which is still used today, although unsafe for pregnant women). Also, I didn't eventually opt for the vaccine, I never said I wouldn't have it. That was your imagination. You called it 'not safe' multiple times even recently. I'm not sure what 'all factors are met' means, but being that 8 billion doses have been administered I'd suggest that its safety profile and effectiveness is no longer a mystery. If you're going to radically reframe to now suggest that 'not safe' refers to aspects of every drug then it's a pointless thing to keep bringing up anyway as it applies to all drugs. The irony of you repeatedly inferring previously that it might be dangerous for babies is that almost all pregnant women hospitalised with covid (some of whom died or were in a coma) were unvaccinated. So there's another group that should get vaccinated rather than scarred off the idea then. PS Book that booster! Edited by BlueJay (10 Dec 2021 1.44am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 10 Dec 21 1.26am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Tim Gypsy Hill '64
Please search back. Then apologise. You didn't even realise that FFP2 and N95 are the same. So who is talking rubbish? Not me. You’ve discredited yourself completely over the last 24 hours. I see no reason to take you seriously. Everything I’ve posted about mask effectiveness references research and factual evidence from reputable sources, and successfully takes out almost all of your points. Especially the ones around mask wearing. You’ve not responded directly and in detail to any of the points that counter your assumptions, as always. FFP2 and N95 are actually technically slightly different. One is slightly less efficient than the other, they’re produced in different countries under different tests and standards. They are comparable, but they are not the same. I think we’re done here.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
BlueJay UK 10 Dec 21 1.33am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
I don't know if it's accurate but I know in the video I linked to that surgeon talked about heart inflammation in the young and that even if there is a tiny risk to themselves that coercing them into vaccines, with no expression of risk....not telling them that there is no legal redress, not telling that long term effects are not known, isn't ethically sound. Everything in life is risk management and the young are very trusting. It was advised against medically and the government just told them to think again....I think that says it all. Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Dec 2021 12.50am) While I don't see covid as being a significant issue for children at all, there is a danger of blotting out the idea that it can cause any issues whatsoever, while highlighting rare mild issues with vaccinations. By which I mean, you've said nothing in your post about how myocarditis is more commonly caused by covid itself or that multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children can be caused by covid (which itself can also cause myocarditis amongst other issues). The above would appear to be very relevant if attempting to imply some kind of danger or negligence due to vaccination, in comparison to not. I agree that it should be explained as with any drug that there can be side effects. Just as it is ethically and morally sound to highlight issues with no getting vaccinated. I can understand parents (and of course children) coming down on either side of this and don't really think either decision is wrong as such, though it does appear that the vast majority of kids shrug off covid without any issue.
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Stirlingsays 10 Dec 21 2.29am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by BlueJay
While I don't see covid as being a significant issue for children at all, there is a danger of blotting out the idea that it can cause any issues whatsoever, while highlighting rare mild issues with vaccinations. By which I mean, you've said nothing in your post about how myocarditis is more commonly caused by covid itself or that multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children can be caused by covid (which itself can also cause myocarditis amongst other issues). The above would appear to be very relevant if attempting to imply some kind of danger or negligence due to vaccination, in comparison to not. I agree that it should be explained as with any drug that there can be side effects. Just as it is ethically and morally sound to highlight issues with no getting vaccinated. I can understand parents (and of course children) coming down on either side of this and don't really think either decision is wrong as such, though it does appear that the vast majority of kids shrug off covid without any issue.
Well they will catch the virus anyway vaccinated or not so I thought it moot. I would be interested to know what the statistics are on that condition and its strength - vaccinated with versus infected without.....given that so many young people have taken the vaccines now. I suppose we differ a little insomuch as I have a firm position on this one whereas you can see an argument for both positions. My position is that unless there is an immune issue the young should not be encouraged to take these particular vaccines, for the initial reasons described. Edited by Stirlingsays (10 Dec 2021 2.34am)
'Who are you and how did you get in here? I'm a locksmith. And, I'm a locksmith.' (Leslie Nielsen) |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Vaibow vancouver/croydon 10 Dec 21 4.34am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
Seriously? You do realise the only thing that’s relevant here is hospitalisations. Deaths are, and have been, irrelevant for some time. The only reason deaths would become an issue for the government would be because of optics and the media scaremongering. Capacity is the real issue, always has been. It really is that simple As I read it, the jury is still out as to whether Omicron will cause longer term capacity issues or not. Maybe there will simply be a short sharp spike then a quick drop off. Maybe there won’t be and the peak will hit just before the winter peak of early Jan. no one knows. The government are deciding to act preemptively and waiting to see what that peak will be in 2-3 weeks time. Hopefully it will be short sharp and things will be wound back in Jan. Hospitalisations?? We are doing this to keep people out of beds? Ok, here's an idea to keep people out of beds. Ban cigarette sales, limit alcohol consumption, lower sugar and salt content in food - have the media do a daily roll call on exercise, vitamin D, zinc. Subsidize organic, local food - teach kids to eat proper food, to make proper food. Make gyms free. Improve mental health facilities. But wait, that doesn't line the corps pockets of make big Pharma billion dollar profits and it doesn't, def doesn't make society dependent on government.
This was once a quality forum.... |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Forest Hillbilly in a hidey-hole 10 Dec 21 7.54am | |
---|---|
I have heard doctors being interviewed on TV in the last 25 hours, saying they are under severe strain with workload. This is attributed to playing 'catch-up' on patients who's treatment/operations have been deferred, and the fact people are getting more freedoms (work, driving, drinking) where accidents are more likely to happen.
I disengage, I turn the page. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Rudi Hedman Caterham 10 Dec 21 9.41am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by SW19 CPFC
He’s an excellent source. Check his latest stuff though… it’s not all doom and gloom. Anecdotal stuff I’m hearing via the medical community is that it’s insanely contagious, but no serious red flags in terms of illness, which chimes with some reporting but not all. I’m personally pretty convinced this will be ‘over’ by Jan and these new restrictions are as far as it goes. But that’s based on a hunch looking through contrasting early data and anecdotal evidence. In 2-3 weeks we’ll know for sure. As long as they do reverse it. It was the lying and false promises early this year that I had enough of, following the bullsh1t scenarios presented in autumn 2020.
COYP |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
SW19 CPFC Addiscombe West 10 Dec 21 9.50am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Vaibow
Hospitalisations?? We are doing this to keep people out of beds? Ok, here's an idea to keep people out of beds. Ban cigarette sales, limit alcohol consumption, lower sugar and salt content in food - have the media do a daily roll call on exercise, vitamin D, zinc. Subsidize organic, local food - teach kids to eat proper food, to make proper food. Make gyms free. Improve mental health facilities. But wait, that doesn't line the corps pockets of make big Pharma billion dollar profits and it doesn't, def doesn't make society dependent on government. I generally agree with all of that, apart from maybe the nannying of forced exercise - only differ a little in how deep the last scenario goes, but generally sound. Obviously that’s a long term strategy tho and not a required instant response to the situation as is, now. As I’ve said to many on here before, if you want your eyes opened re Pharma, read anything and everything by Ben Goldacre.
Did you know? 98.0000001% of people are morons. |
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
DanH SW2 10 Dec 21 9.56am | |
---|---|
Originally posted by Stirlingsays
No doubt just one of several mental faculties. Edited by Stirlingsays (09 Dec 2021 10.53pm) You are you to intellectualism what Rik Waller is to marathon running. Edited by DanH (10 Dec 2021 9.56am)
|
|
Alert a moderator to this post |
Registration is now on our new message board
To login with your existing username you will need to convert your account over to the new message board.
All images and text on this site are copyright © 1999-2024 The Holmesdale Online, unless otherwise stated.
Web Design by Guntrisoft Ltd.